Sea-Tac airport opened a new, third runway in November because the Port of Seattle, which runs the airport, needed a backup runway in times of heavy air traffic and/or bad weather to accommodate their landing volume. However, many nearby residents are claiming that the explanation the Port of Seattle gave at the time the third runway was approved has not proven to be the case, and they are preparing an all-out legal battle against the Port for damages.
According to KOMO:
“Many of these angry, frustrated residents live along or near 12th Avenue South in SeaTac, the neighborhood now directly under the flight path for all incoming flights for SeaTac, bringing with them plenty of noise and complaints.
At the meeting, many of them said they can’t even get to sleep at night without wearing earplugs. And they’re ready to go to court.
“It wakes me up at night and the early morning,” says Colleen Criss, one of the homeowners at the meeting.
But in past weeks as all incoming Sea-Tac flights have shifted to the new third runway, and complaints of noise, toxic fumes, and vibrations have increased greatly.
The Port of Seattle says it had no choice but to shift flights to the new runway because the FAA has required repairs to an older runway.
“It’s gonna be noisier for a six-month period,” says port spokesman Perry Cooper.
But many residents find it hard to believe anything the port says, and some are feeling naive for believing the runway was only for poor weather and limited use. ”
As a result, a class action lawsuit is being planned as are several individual lawsuits. If you have been harmed by noise or toxic pollution, it could constitute a valid injury claim. In order to find out, contact the personal injury attorneys at Phillips & Webster today to schedule a free initial consultation.

