Washington Law Blog
Personal Injury, Car Accidents, Trucking Accidents,
motorcycle accidents and consumer law blog...

  • * First Name:
  • * Last Name:
  • * Email:
  • * Phone Number:
  • Comment:
  • Accept Terms *
  • *Denotes Required Field

News Updates via Email

If you would like to receive our news updates right to your inbox, provide us with your email address. We won't use your email for anything besides sending you news updates from our blog.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Dangerous Drug Information

If you or a loved one has been injured by the side effects of a defective drug, our defective drug attorneys can help you and your family. We are currently investigating the following dangerous drugs:

Drug Side Effects and Injuries

Law Blog Categories

Car Accidents
3 Reasons to Hire Phillips Webster

Our attorneys have decades of experience negotiating with insurance companies regarding all types of vehicle accidents. If you have been injured in a wreck, contact us today.

  1. We represent EVERYONE in need anywhere in Washington - Minor and Major Injuries
  2. Experienced trial attorneys that will fight for your right to recover compensation
  3. FREE Case Review and we only get paid if you get paid
Learn more about our:
Seattle Car Accident Lawyers

Verdicts & Settlements

$20 MILLION - Commercial Injury
Confidential settlement for a commercial injury case

$19  Million - Grant of Coverage
Grant of coverage in insurance coverage case

$2 MILLION - INSURANCE BAD FAITH
Settlement in insurance bad faith case

$1.5 MILLION - CAR ACCIDENT WRONGFUL DEATH
Vancouver, Washington car accident that resulted in a death

$1 MILLION - DUI ACCIDENT VICTIM
Settlement for young man hit by a drunk driver

Our jury trial experience shows in the results we get both inside and outside of the courtroom.

More Verdicts and Settlements

 

Archive for May, 2010

Workers Compensation Lawyers: Creating a Safe Workplace in Washington State

Worker's Compensation, Worker's Compensation Lawyers

May 31st, 2010: Law Blogger

Workers Compensation Lawyers: Creating a Safe Workplace in Washington StateWhen an employee suffers serious personal injuries in the workplace in Washington State it is usually taken very seriously and prompts an investigation by Labor and Industries (L&I). L&I is a state run insurance agency that protects workers and assures that they make a reasonable living wage during their recovery after being hurt in the workplace. They send out a representative and look very closely at the policies and procedures the employer has in place to protect the employee.

This investigation may also prompt an investigation by the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) who sets the federal standards for safety in the workplace. Their standards get as specific as to how to handle each tool for dozens of industries around the country.

But, there are general standards in Washington that stretch across every industry from fairly safe office environments to hazardous industrial sites. What we are examining is the general standards that an employer must meet to protect the safety of their employees on a day to day basis.

Creating a Safe Workplace in Washington State

  1. Provide a workplace free from recognized hazards. (WAC 296-800-11005) – The employer must provide employees with a workplace free from recognized hazards that are causing, or are likely to cause, serious injury or death.
  2. Provide and use means to make your workplace safe. (WAC 296-800-11010) – The employer is expected to provide and use safety devices, safeguards, and use work practices, methods, processes, and means that are reasonably adequate to make the workplace safe. They are also expected not to remove, displace, damage, destroy or carry off any safety device, safeguard, notice or warning, furnished for use in any place of employment.
  3. Prohibit employees from entering, or being in, any workplace that is not safe. (WAC 296-800-11015) – Though fairly self explanatory, this extends to employees that are not trained or authorized to be in an area from entering that area, thus putting themselves and others at risk.
  4. Construct your workplace so it is safe. (WAC 296-800-11020) – This rule applies to employers, owners, and renters of property used as a place of employment. This is in regards to construction of a new workplace or build-outs and modifications to current facilities.
  5. Prohibit alcohol and narcotics from your workplace. (WAC 296-800-11025) – Both L&I and OHSA recommend that all employers prohibit alcohol and narcotics from your workplace, with the exception of industries and businesses that produce, distribute, or sell alcohol and narcotic drugs. And of course they recommend that employers Prohibit employees under the influence of alcohol or narcotics from the worksite in any setting with the exception of employees who are taking prescription drugs if the employees are not a danger to themselves or other employees.
  6. Prohibit employees from using tools and equipment that are not safe. (WAC 296-800-11030) – This applies to all equipment, materials, tools, and machinery whether owned by the employer or another firm or individual. Employers are advised to take responsibility for the safe condition of tools and equipment used by employees.
  7. Establish, supervise, and enforce rules that lead to a safe and healthy work environment that are effective in practice. (WAC 296-800-11035) – OSHA has a workplace safety poster that employers are told to place in plain sight of employees such as in common areas, lunch room, etc.
  8. Control chemical agents. (WAC 296-800-11040) – Employers are expected to protect workers from the hazard of contact with, or exposure to, chemical agents. Pesticides are considered to be chemical agents and are widely used in industries even outside of agriculture. Pesticide manufacturers always supply precautionary statements in the information delivered with the pesticide. Employers are urged to follow those instructions that tell how to protect workers from the hazards of pesticides.
  9. Protect employees from biological agents. (WAC 296-800-11045) – Exposure to hazardous concentrations of biological agents resulting from processing, handling or using materials or waste can be extremely harmful to an employee. Employers are advised to refer to the standards set by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) when employees are exposed to biological agents that occur during cleanup, or other tasks, where employees handle:
  • Animals or animal waste
  • Body fluids
  • Biological agents in a medical research lab
  • Mold or mildew

Workers Compensation Lawyers

Throughout United States history workers have put their livelihood and personal safety on the line to force employers and the government to recognize safety standards in the workplace. This is still an uphill struggle. There seems to be cases on a weekly basis where employers have decided to forego employee safety in order to increase their profits. This behavior is unethical and illegal.

Sometimes violations and unsafe workplaces can be reported, but little to no action is taken due to lack of government funding for inspectors or other factors. Other times the employee is unaware that they are working on a daily basis in an unsafe workplace and only realize it after they suffer a serious personal injury. In these cases the employee’s only recourse is through legal means to prompt change so that others will not be subject to undue harm.

That is why the injured worker needs an experienced representative to assure that their interests are secured and that they get the compensation they deserve. If you have been hurt while on the job, call the workers compensation lawyers at Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Seattle Car Accident Lawyers: 2 Suffer Personal Injuries in Hwy 99 Roll-Over Accident

personal injury lawyers, Seattle Car Accident Lawyers

May 31st, 2010: Law Blogger

Roll-Over Accident on Hwy 99A man was driving with a passenger southbound on Highway 99 just south of the Aurora Bridge when he lost control causing the car to roll several times and crash this morning around 7:30 am.

Firefighters blocked both directions of the highway while they worked to cut the two people from the mangled wreck.

Both were rushed to Harborview Medical Center with serious personal injuries. One was said to have life threatening injuries.

Neighbors wondered if anyone could survive that crash. Witnesses said that speed and slick roads may have been a factor in the car accident. They also said that accidents are common in that area and some of accidents are fatal.

Northbound traffic was getting through by about 7:45 am, but the southbound lanes were closed for two hours while police investigated the crash.

Speeding is a major issue on Highway 99/Aurora Avenue. Sections of the highway have cramped lanes and no medians separating on coming traffic. This can be a major hazard and has resulted in many personal injury lawsuits and wrongful death lawsuits.

If you or someone you know has been injured in a car accident, you need experienced council to represent you with the insurance companies to assure you receive the compensation you deserve. Call the Seattle car accident attorneys at Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Update: The passenger has died and the driver is expected to be booked on vehicular homicide upon release from the hospital. 4:30 pm Monday.

Learn More About:

Defective Drug Lawyers: J&J Hearings Prompt Ethics Questions & PediaCare Recall

Defective Drugs, washington defective drug attorney

May 31st, 2010: Law Blogger

PeciaCare RecallJohnson and Johnson (J&J) has been facing some major problems lately connected to pulling 40 types of children’s drugs from store shelves this month after a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspection in April found contaminated materials at a manufacturing facility run by the company’s McNeil Consumer Healthcare unit.

FDA officials and a J&J executive testified about the manufacturing problems on Thursday at a U.S. House Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions hearing. These hearings took an unexpected turn that revealed serious violations and a scathing breech of ethics.

Following the hearings another unit of J&J that produces children’s medicine, Blacksmith Brands Inc., announced a recall Friday of about 100,000 units of four PediaCare items sold nationwide. These recalled items include PediaCare Multi-Symptom Cold, PediaCare Long Acting Cough, PediaCare Decongestant and PediaCare Allergy and Cold.

One resounding theme of all of the happenings surrounding J&J last week revealed that the giant pharmaceutical company’s efforts to restructure and cut costs over the last three to four years resulted in putting children in serious danger. This has further besmirched the already tainted reputation of a company that had a very public recall of their Tylenol products in 1984 regarding tampered products containing poison. This scandal drastically changed packaging standards. Perhaps J&J will once again change the over the counter policies in the US.

PediaCare Recall

Blacksmith Brands said on Friday it was recalling the four PediaCare items because they were made at the same manufacturing facility run by McNeil Consumer Healthcare. Apparently, there have been no reported incidents linked to the recalled PediaCare products, but tiny particles have been found in other products that were made at the McNeil plant, Blacksmith Brands said.

The PediaCare items involved in the recall are:

  • PediaCare Multi-Symptom Cold 4oz. UPC # 3 0045-0556-05 9
  • PediaCare Long Acting Cough 4oz. UPC# 3 0045-0465-04 7
  • PediaCare Decongestant 4oz. UPC# 3 0045-0554-04 8
  • PediaCare Allergy and Cold 4oz. UPC# 3 0045-0552-04 4

Ingredients used by J&J in some of the 40 varieties of previously recalled children and infant medicines were contaminated with bacteria, according to an FDA report released this month. The report lists more than 20 manufacturing problems at the McNeil plant where the newly recalled PediaCare products were produced.

Tylenol Recall Hearings

Rep. HarkinThe FDA’s principal deputy commissioner, Joshua Sharfstein, told committee members at a hearing on Thursday that McNeil Consumer Healthcare had a “pattern of noncompliance” with good manufacturing practices. He said FDA regulators were considering such punitive measures as “seizure, injunction or criminal penalties.”

The FDA’s criminal investigations office is looking into the matter, an aide said. Dr. Sharfstein said the agency was now working well with J&J and its McNeil unit, but he described a history of troubles getting the unit to fix violations.

The hearing then took a surprising turn into a new controversy that had not been previously revealed to the press. The committee began questioning the lone J&J executive, Colleen Goggins, who oversees J&J’s consumer business, as to why, after the company discovered some defective Motrin products, J&J instructed a contractor to send out workers to buy the entire available product off retail shelves.

Under pressure from the FDA, the company issued a recall of 88,104 packages of Motrin in July 2009. “I don’t think we fully understood what was going on,” Dr. Sharfstein said.

J&J had learned as early as November 2008 that certain Motrin pills wouldn’t dissolve appropriately, thus reducing or completely negating their effectiveness. The company put a hold on lots at its distribution center. Then, instead of issuing a recall, they hired a contractor to sample some of the eight-count packages on store shelves to see if a recall was necessary, according to an FDA PowerPoint document.

The contractor appeared to take their job farther and instructed workers to visit all of the stores “on your schedule to locate and purchase” all of the Motrin eight-count packages, according to a memo shown at the House committee hearing. The memo said “you should simply ‘act’ like a regular customer in making these purchases,” and advised the workers not to talk about a recall.

Goggins told the committee that she didn’t know what instructions had been given to the contractor. She also said that it’s unclear what prompted the contractor to direct its workers to buy up all packages on store shelves, thus neatly hanging the issue on the contractor and leaving them out to dry.

Some on the committee suggested that the lower standards displayed by McNeil have occurred amid J&J’s cost-cutting and consolidation of some functions. Last year, J&J announced plans to cut 8,200 jobs, or 7% of its work force, as part of a broad restructuring that aims to achieve $1.7 billion in yearly savings by 2011. J&J executives also recently moved to standardize compensation across the company.

The consumer business’s overall spending on property, plant and equipment fell to $439 million last year from $499 million the year before. Goggins said the cost-cutting measures didn’t overall quality control at the problematic Fort Washington facility. She said the head count among Fort Washington’s quality staff was flat from 2006 to 2009, while the plant’s quality-control spending during that time rose 17%.

Defective Drug Lawyers

J&J’s consumer business, which includes the McNeil unit and other companies, had $15.8 billion in sales and $2.48 billion in profit. This looks fantastic to shareholders just as long as they don’t actually give their children these products.

As a defective drug law firm, it is our aim to protect consumers from some of the policies of giant pharmaceutical companies to profit off of drugs that they know may be harmful to consumers. Many of these policies result from lack of diligent research and lack of oversight. Other causes stem from irresponsible and dangerous cost-cutting measures the can result in putting the consumer’s health in jeopardy such as the current J&J issue.

Phillips Webster represents consumers and their loved ones in personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits resulting from defective drugs. If you or someone you know has been affected by the serious problems surrounding Children’s Tylenol or PediaCare products it is important to have experienced representation on your side to assure that your voice will be heard and that you receive the compensation that you deserve. Call the defective drug lawyers at Phillips Webster for a free consultation on your legal options.

Learn More About:

Personal Injury Lawyers: 1 Dead, 2 Personally Injured in Weekend Car Accident

personal injury, Seattle personal injury attorney

May 31st, 2010: Law Blogger

24th Ave NE approaching Northgate WayAn Acura Integra was traveling northbound on 24th Avenue NE around 1:30 am yesterday morning. The car approached NE Northgate Way and failed to take the left curve accurately. The car lost control, ran off the road, and hit a tree.

When police and fire fighters arrived they found the 27-year-old driver with two male passengers and a dog in the car.

The driver was pronounced dead at the scene.

Seattle Fire transported the two passengers to Harborview with serious personal injuries.

The dog was transported to a local veterinarian with non life-threatening injuries.

The name of the driver has been held pending notification of the family. Our condolences go out to them.

Many times sharp curves such as the one at 24th Ave NE have a marked speed limit so that cars of any type can safely manipulate it. Since it has been a soggy long weekend it is especially important that drivers are extra cautious about negotiating some of Seattle’s more hazardous roadways.

If you or someone you know has suffered a personal injury in an auto accident it is important that you find an experienced representative to face insurance companies on your behalf. Call the experienced Personal Injury Lawyers at Phillips Webster for a free consultation as to your legal options.

Learn More About:

Seattle Car Accident Attorneys: 7 yr-old Suffers Personal Injuries in Speeding Accident

Seattle Car Accident Lawyers, Seattle personal injury attorney

May 28th, 2010: Law Blogger

Hwy 92 & Grade RoadThere was bizarre series of events last night that left Lake Stevens Police confused as to what caused a man to lose control of his vehicle, injuring himself and an 7-year-old child, Lake Stevens Police Chief Randy Celori said.

The driver is a man in his 20s who was headed east from Highway 9 when he crashed into one vehicle near 113th Street NE, Celori said. He then left the scene and continued to Grade Road where he crashed into a second vehicle, injuring the 8 year-old child.

Witnesses pulled the man out of the burning car before medics arrived on the scene.

A 7-year-old boy, who was riding in the back seat of the the hit car, was taken to the Colby Campus of the Providence Regional Medical Center with personal injuries. He was wearing his seat belt at the time, investigators said. The boy’s father and driver of the car was shaken, but not injured.

The driver was rushed to Harborview Medical Center in Seattle with serious personal injuries, Celori reported.

The cause of the crash has not been determined. Witnesses reported seeing the causing driver speeding down the street the moments before the crash.

Investigators are looking into whether alcohol or drugs played a role.

The crash closed Highway 92 until about 7:35 pm.

High speeds and drunk driving are the difference between a minor accident to a major car accident resulting in serious personal injuries. Please, if you have had a drink find an alternative way home.

If you or someone you know has been injured in a roll over accident some of the best advice one can get is to seek experienced legal advice. Call Phillips Webster for a consultation.

Learn More About:

Wrongful Death Lawyers: 2 Teens Charged with Vehicular Homicide in Racing Accident

Wrongful Death, wrongful death attorney

May 28th, 2010: Law Blogger

Brooke Reese's Car in the police Investigation LotTwo teenagers involved in the crash in February of this year that killed a 19-year-old Spokane woman have now been charged with vehicular homicide.

Detectives say Brooke Reese and Taylor Marean were racing when their cars collided on Hatch road, a crash that killed Jacoby Bryant at the scene.

Reese admits that she had been drinking at a party before the crash. When detectives searched her car after the crash they found meth in her purse.

In court documents Reese called her decision to race, “the worst decision of my life.”

Racing is always a terrible idea. It puts everyone in a wide area at risk. Speeding is the top cause of death amongst male drivers 15-35. When you add two people with little to no training in high speed driving attempting to outdo each other on the same road, that can only lead to serious personal injury or death.

If you suspect that your loved one’s death in a fatal car accident was caused due to the negligence of another driver it is important that you find legal council that is experienced in wrongful death lawsuits. Call the Seattle car accident lawyers at Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Trucking Accident Lawyers: 2 Suffer Personal Injuries in Dump Truck Roll-Over

trucking accident attorneys, Trucking Accidents, Washington trucking accidents lawyers

May 28th, 2010: Law Blogger

Over-turned Dump TruckTwo people suffered serious personal injuries after an afternoon multi-car collision in Lynnwood yesterday, police said. At least three vehicles and a dump truck were involved in the collision.

The dump truck was carrying a load of asphalt and it overturned in the intersection.

The incident blocked one lane in each direction on Highway 99 and 168th Street Southwest in Lynnwood.

All lanes were reopened by 5:25 p.m. Thursday, said the Washington Department of Transportation (DOT).

Though trucks are driven by certified professionals there can be many hazards when being around them. Make sure to allow them lots of room behind you, when driving behind them make sure you follow far enough that you can see their rear view mirrors, and never pass on the right.

If you or someone you know has be involved in a commercial trucking accident, the trucking company has an experienced legal team on their side and so should you. Call the Seattle car accident lawyers at Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Personal Injury Lawyers: Metro Passenger Awarded $1.3 Million for Serious Leg Injury

personal injury, Seattle personal injury attorney

May 28th, 2010: Law Blogger

metro bus enteranceA King County jury has awarded Keith Knappett, a Metro passenger $1.3 million for personal injuries he sustained when he slipped while exiting a bus. He suffered permanent and severe leg injuries. He now needs a cane to walk and faces possible amputation.

It happened in 2006, when Knappett was getting off of a Metro bus in downtown Seattle. He slipped off the edge of the back stairs of the bus, and doctors said his left leg shattered upon impact.

“Suddenly, I was just flying through the air,” Knappett said. “And the next thing I knew, I hit the ground and was looking down at my foot, which was basically swaying down at the end of my leg.”

His lawyer contended when portions of the bus stairs get wet, they become slick as ice. She said the bright yellow material on the stairs are especially susceptible to slickness. To this day Metro has not fixed or altered the design of the stairs, which have proven to be extremely hazardous, his lawyer said.

“He has not been free of pain since that day,” she added.

But Metro has claimed the plaintiff’s contention is false. A spokeswoman for the agency said the stairs on Metro buses are designed to keep riders safe, even in slick conditions.

skid material“We…noted that the steps on our buses are equipped with non-skid material,” said Rochelle Ogershok with the King County Department of Transportation. “Our buses are well-maintained and in this case, we just disagreed with the verdict.”

Knappett said $1.3 million may seem like a large sum, but not when his mounting medical costs are considered.

Metro has not yet decided whether to appeal the award.

Many times, these types of injuries can lead to many other different symptoms and ongoing health issues and pain and suffering. Some of the most debilitating types of injuries are leg injuries that can cause lead to less exercise which leads to weight gain, depression, and other problems related to limited movement.

If you or a loved one is seriously injured due to the negligent policies of a government entity, organization, company, or individual then you need a legal representative that is experienced in personal injury lawsuits that can protect your best interests and assure that you get the compensation you deserve. Call Phillips Webster for a consultation.

Learn More About:

Seattle Car Accident Lawyers: Head-on Collision Causes Serious Personal Injuries

head-on collision, Seattle personal injury attorney

May 28th, 2010: Law Blogger

8200 block of the Lowell-Snohomish River Road A man, 40, from Everett was westbound in a Ford Escort near the 8200 block of the Lowell-Snohomish River Road about 6:30 pm last night when he was struck by an eastbound Ford pickup that crossed the center line, according to the Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office.

The pickup was driven by a Snohomish resident in his late 20s.

The man was rushed to Harborview Medical Center with critical personal injuries.

The pickup driver was taken to Evergreen Hospital in Kirkland with serious personal injuries.

There were no passengers in either vehicle and the cause of the crash is still under investigation.

Many times head-on collisions are caused by drift of one of the cars into oncoming traffic due to fatigue or distracted driving. That is particularly hazardous on higher speed roadways that lack medians in the middle of the road to prohibit this type of accident.

If you or someone you know has been injured in a car accident in the state of Washington, you need an experienced representative to deal with the insurance companies to assure you the best settlement. Call the Seattle car accident attorneys at Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Toyota Recall Lawyers: What is the Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 2010?

Toyota recall, Toyota recall lawyers

May 27th, 2010: Law Blogger

Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 2010Toyota was back in the news today, but for the first time in months it has nothing to do with more problems and recalls, but rather the repercussions from the problems and recalls. If you don’t remember, Toyota recalled around 10 million of their vehicles for sudden acceleration problems they blamed on sticky gas pedals and defective floor mats. Independent researchers have said that the problem stems from neither of those concerns, but a software issue.

But today Congress assured that some of the major issues that are plaguing Toyota vehicles won’t happen to other car manufacturers in the future. After hours of hearings, a major Nation Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) investigation, and hundreds of lawsuits, legislators finally put together a strong set of new guidelines that will affect the whole car industry, not just Toyota.

Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 2010

The partisan debate was heated as a House panel has advanced a sweeping auto safety bill that critics contend is too tough on the industry. The House Energy and Commerce Committee put forth a new set of revisions, which is moving on to a general House vote.

If the bill becomes law, automakers would be required to install brake-override systems and event data recorders (black boxes) on every vehicle sold in the U.S. The automotive black boxes were originally intended to record 75 seconds of data, but the committee opted to leave that decision up to the NHTSA.

Additionally, regulators are said to be considering standards for shift lever configuration, push-button ignition systems, pedal placement, and vehicular electronic systems — including noisemakers for electric and hybrid vehicles that would otherwise run virtually silently.

Specifically they intend to:

  • Establish a new Center for Vehicle Electronics and Emerging Technologies within NHTSA to strengthen the agency’s expertise in new technologies across all vehicle safety components.
  • Require new safety standards related to electronics and unintended acceleration, including a brake-override standard.
  • NHTSA to consider standards to prevent pedals from getting trapped in floor mats or other obstructions as well as standards for electronic systems performance.
  • Require all vehicles to be equipped with event data recorders that record crash information.
  • Require more “Early Warning Reporting” data submitted to NHTSA on a quarterly basis and have this information made available to the public. This is intended to improve public accessibility of the NHTSA website, and encourages consumers to report potential defects to the agency.
  • Require all auto manufacturers have a senior executive in the United States to certify the accuracy of information submitted to NHTSA in response to investigations. This will give more accountability to individual executives within the companies. Auto executives who knowingly provide false information to the government could face penalties of up to $5 million under the proposal.
  • There is a provision for an appeals process if a citizen whose petition to NHTSA requesting a defect investigation has been rejected by the agency in a court of law.
  • There will be a vehicle safety user fee paid by the vehicle manufacturer for each vehicle certified to meet the federal motor vehicle safety standards for sale in the United States. The fee of $3 to $9 per vehicle would fund NHTSA’s safety program.
  • In addition, the legislation doubles the authorization for NHTSA’s vehicle safety programs over three years.
  • The bill will increase the civil penalty NHTSA can seek per violation and increases the maximum civil penalty allowed to $200 million. Currently the cap is $16.4 million which was levied upon Toyota last month.
  • It will provide NHTSA the authority to expedite recalls in the case of an imminent hazard.

Government Debate

Henry WaxmanThe legislation, approved 31-21 by the House Energy and Commerce Committee now goes to the full House where lawmakers hope to pass it later this year.

Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., the committee’s chairman, called it a “balanced bill” that would “dramatically improve the safety of motor vehicles.” But Republicans said the bill, including tougher fines, was overly harsh on the industry. They questioned efforts to boost federal funding for the NHTSA.

“If you think this bill helps the automotive industry … I’ve got a bridge in Brooklyn that I don’t own that I’d be happy to sell to you,” said Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas.

Cliché rhetoric intended to boost campaign coughers aside, Democrats said the federal agency had been under-funded for years, limiting its ability to root out potential safety defects.

Auto manufacturers currently conduct voluntary safety recalls with recommendations of NHTSA from consumer reports. But if the automakers disagree with the government on the need for one, NHTSA must develop a case for a recall and then hold a public hearing. This process can take months. The bill empowers NHTSA to order a recall if it finds “substantial likelihood of death or serious injury to the public.” Automakers could present information before the department issues a final order.

Toyota Recall Lawsuits

There have been hundreds of lawsuits brought against Toyota for their sudden acceleration recall. Some of these lawsuits are also wrongful death lawsuits that are connected to the issues surrounding the recall. The lawsuits have been centered within the state of California where a judge has been assigned to address the lawsuits and consolidate them if needed.

The California judge actually did that very thing today, consolidating 40 of the California lawsuits into one class action lawsuit. This allows a consolidation of evidence and allows Toyota legal teams to address each lawsuit by type rather than individually which is a long and expensive process. Since there are still hundreds of lawsuits to be addressed you still have time to file your lawsuit.

If you have recently bought or own a new Toyota or know someone who owns a new Toyota you may be entitled to a settlement for the lost value of your car. If you have been injured or have a loved one that has been killed by a defective Toyota then you should find council that is experienced in defective product litigation immediately. Call Phillips Webster for a consultation into your legal options.

Learn More About: