Washington Law Blog
Personal Injury, Car Accidents, Trucking Accidents,
motorcycle accidents and consumer law blog...

  • * First Name:
  • * Last Name:
  • * Email:
  • * Phone Number:
  • Comment:
  • Accept Terms *
  • *Denotes Required Field

News Updates via Email

If you would like to receive our news updates right to your inbox, provide us with your email address. We won't use your email for anything besides sending you news updates from our blog.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Dangerous Drug Information

If you or a loved one has been injured by the side effects of a defective drug, our defective drug attorneys can help you and your family. We are currently investigating the following dangerous drugs:

Drug Side Effects and Injuries

Law Blog Categories

Car Accidents
3 Reasons to Hire Phillips Webster

Our attorneys have decades of experience negotiating with insurance companies regarding all types of vehicle accidents. If you have been injured in a wreck, contact us today.

  1. We represent EVERYONE in need anywhere in Washington - Minor and Major Injuries
  2. Experienced trial attorneys that will fight for your right to recover compensation
  3. FREE Case Review and we only get paid if you get paid
Learn more about our:
Seattle Car Accident Lawyers

Verdicts & Settlements

$20 MILLION - Commercial Injury
Confidential settlement for a commercial injury case

$19  Million - Grant of Coverage
Grant of coverage in insurance coverage case

$2 MILLION - INSURANCE BAD FAITH
Settlement in insurance bad faith case

$1.5 MILLION - CAR ACCIDENT WRONGFUL DEATH
Vancouver, Washington car accident that resulted in a death

$1 MILLION - DUI ACCIDENT VICTIM
Settlement for young man hit by a drunk driver

Our jury trial experience shows in the results we get both inside and outside of the courtroom.

More Verdicts and Settlements

 

Archive for July, 2010

Accutane Lawyers: Stars Lineup To Testify Against Accutane; Sheen, Reiner, Dennehy

Accutane, Accutane Lawsuits, Accutane Lawyers, What is Accutane?

July 30th, 2010: Law Blogger

Accutane LawyersSwiss drug maker Roche and their popular acne drug Accutane (isotretinoin) is no stranger to the courtroom. But what they are strangers to is a row of paparazzi and a red carpet leading into the courthouse.

All of this hoopla is over allegations by an actor named James Marshal. Never heard of him? Well, that’s the problem. The actor says that the serious side effects of Accutane derailed his career, a career that he and his lawyer said could have equaled that of the legendary James Dean, but instead barely entered the Pauly Shore stratosphere. But before we go into Mr. Marshall’s story, you need to know a little about the drug and what it does.

Accutane was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1982 as a cure for severe cystic acne sufferers who do not get relief from standard dietary and less effective drug treatments. Isotretinoin, a derivative of vitamine A, was first used as a chemotherapy supplement because it was found to hamper cell division in the body. Vitamin A and substances that contain lots of it, like broccoli, have been used for hundreds of years to treat skin, but concentrated vitamin A in large quantities is poisonous. Isotretinoin solves that problem.

There is no dispute that the drug works, but the side effects are severe and Accutane has a laundry list of them. The biggy is birth defects, but the most deadly has turn out to be suicide, particularly amongst the younger patients. This has prompted the FDA to create the iPledge program, the most stringent control of any drug on the market. It requires monthly visits to the doctor for the 4-6 month treatment and a signed contract.

During the visits the physician takes blood to test for pregnancy and examines the progress of the drug and the patient. The problem is that they don’t test for debilitating side effect Marshal and thousands of other patients complain Accutane caused, Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD).

Accutane Trial

James Marshal - Dreamboat in trainingYou might remember James Marshall. He played U.S. Marine Louden Downey in the 1992 hit movie “A Few Good Men,” starring Tom Cruise, Jack Nicholson, Demi Moore, Kiefer Sutherland, and (like any good movie) Kevin Bacon. The movie was directed by Rob Reiner, one of the witnesses for the defendant.

Marshal claims that his chance at stardom was essentially killed by the crippling side effects due to his use of Accutane. Marshal is asking a jury to award at least $11 million in damages at a trial starting next week that will feature testimony from stars such as Martin Sheen and Brian Dennehy, according to court filings.

Sheen, Dennehy and Reiner will testify that Marshall, now 43, was surely headed for stardom before bowel ailments allegedly caused by Accutane forced doctors to remove his colon.

Reiner, who will testify by videotaped deposition, will tell jurors Marshall had a bright future in the entertainment business that was cut short by his Accutane-related illnesses. Sheen and Dennehy are scheduled to testify in person about Marshall’s potential as an actor.

Marshall’s case has been combined with claims by two other former Accutane users for trial before Judge Carol Higbee in state court in Atlantic City. All three are California residents. Andrews, 29, is an account manager while Gaghan, 34, is a nursing assistant. All of the plaintiffs in the case contend that the drug left them struggling to deal with the pain and suffering of passing their bodily wastes through a tender and inflamed colon.

Both Andrews and Marshall battle incontinence (unexpected bowel movements requiring adult under garments) while Gaghan has developed lupus (a further progressively worse version of IBD) as a result of taking drugs to deal with her Accutane-linked bowel disease, their lawyer said.

Accutane Lawsuits

accutaneAbout 13 million people have taken Accutane in the last 28 years. It was once Roche’s second-biggest selling drug yielding literally $3 billion a year like a big acne fighting money tree. But, like all drugs, patents are only for 20 years and in 2002 Roche lost patent protection. They continued to sell it along with generic competitors and were still able to gather a large portion of the market, keeping annual sales as high as $1.7 billion.

Not bad when competition is all of a sudden created, but there was something chopping even deeper into their pockets and that was lawsuits. The company has lost all lawsuits launched against Accutane since 2007, including the last three in a row.

New Jersey and Florida juries ordered the drugmaker to pay a total of at least $45 million in damages in those cases. Appeals courts later threw out two of the verdicts, including a 2007 award of $7 million to a Florida man who blamed the drug for his inflammatory bowel disease.

Then in February a New Jersey jury ordered Roche to pay $25.1 million to a man who attributed his inflammatory bowel disease to Accutane. The case was a retrial of an earlier verdict that was overturned by an appeals court. Roche has won dismissals of Accutane cases filed in federal court and has challenged the state court verdicts by asking judges to throw them out or filing appeals.

But all of this activity is coming at a high price tag in legal fees. A price tag that prompted them to take their production of Accutane off of the market in 2009, leaving the generic drug makers to deal with whatever repercussions come from the drug’s side effects. Of course Roche has not turned its back on the international market which seems to be much more forgiving of debilitating side effects.

Regardless, this may be the first drug trial with such a star studded cast testifying about the effects on the patients and how the drug can literally change their quality of life and derail their future, whether it is an actor bound for super stardom or a nurse, both are equal when they are sobbing in the bathroom from the pain.

If you or a loved one is suffering from the life-altering side effects of Accutane then you need an experienced defective drug attorney on your side that can get you the compensation you deserve. Call Phillips Webster for a free consultation on your legal options.

Learn More About:

Washington Car Accident Lawyers: 2 Injured When Woman Stops Car on I-90 Fast Lane

Car accidents, personal injury, Seattle Car Accident Lawyers, Washington car accident lawyer

July 30th, 2010: Law Blogger

1-90, one mile west of RitzvilleThere is certain dangers to stopping on the side of a freeway where cars whizzing by at 60 to 70 miles per hour. That’s why people are advised to use rest stops to take care of “business” and if they are having car trouble to not get out of their cars to set road flares until they have called 911 and informed authorities of their location. But those are rules for stopping on the shoulder of the road, where as a California woman stopped on the freeway, which there is only one rule…don’t.

According to the Washington State Patrol, Ida C. Conner, 70, of Covelo, Calif., was traveling westbound on I-90 around 2:45 pm yesterday when she stopped her Chevrolet Cavalier in the left lane about a mile west of Ritzville.

That’s when David J. Redwine, 59, of Moses Lake, crashed into Conner with his Pontiac Montana demolishing both cars.

Medical crews and police rushed to the scene. Conner was airlifted by Med Star to Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center, where she was listed in critical condition last night.

Redwine was reported in stable condition at East Adams Rural Hospital in Ritzville.

We hope that they both recover fully and quickly.

We have no idea what the circumstances surrounding what made Conner stop in the middle of the freeway. It very well could have been a medical emergency, which can cause people to panic or even lose consciousness. Medical emergencies come on suddenly, unexpectedly, and at any age. At those moments all drivers around them are at great risk, so if you experience one, try to stay calm and pull over if possible.

If you or a loved one has suffered serious personal injuries in a car accident with a negligent driver you will need skilled legal counsel to walk you through the steps to assure that your best interests are represented to assure that you get the compensation you deserve. Call Washington Car Accident Lawyers at Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Distracted Driving: Legislature Mulls Over New Technology That Stops Texting While Driving

distracted drivers, distracted driving, distracted driving attorneys, distracted driving lawyers

July 30th, 2010: Law Blogger

Distracted Driving LawyersYou may be in the camp that feels that its okay to read and reply to texts while driving. We, along with most of the Washington legislature and all of the victims of distracted drivers, think that perhaps you’re wrong on this one. And now there’s a chance that your actual phone will force you to change that behavior.

Just in June the distracted driving law came into effect and since then there has been controversy as police from different municipalities started doling out tickets like the number machine at the DMV without the city having gone through the proper procedures to do so. Now it turns out that they’re going to be giving hundreds of thousands of dollars in refunds.

Regardless, eventually the cities and towns will get it right and all of those people you still see on the road with phones in their faces covering half of their field of vision and others thumbing away at their tiny keyboard as they drive with their elbows will be paying $124 each time they get caught.

The drivers that insist on not using a headset or checking their email during their commute may cite studies that show that headsets don’t change the fact that people are distracted and reduce their reaction time by a third, which could be the difference between a serious car accident and a near miss.

A 2009 study by Virginia Tech researchers videotaping millions of hours of eye movements of drivers found that texting while driving made the risk of a crash or near-crash more than 23 times more likely than non-distracted driving.

Now technology is coming out that may just run with that argument and make it almost impossible for drivers to drive distracted.

Distracted Driving

In February, Jeff Haley and colleague Mike Robinson formed the Seattle-based Distracted Driving Foundation. The fledgling non-profit is one of the organizations working on technology that can recognize if a person is driving and then locks the phone from distracting them.

Callers are greeted with an automatic voice message: “The person you have called is driving and cannot take your call.”

The organization is trying to collaborate with other companies and organizations that already make software that put phones in “driving mode” when the phone senses it is moving more than 15 miles per hour. One of the hurdles is to make the technology recognize when people are in the passenger seat or on public transportation.

They want lawmakers to require phones in view of the driver to automatically disable when the car is running.

The foundation’s website says that, “We believe that government, through state or federal legislation, should require phone companies to use available and new technology to restrict the functions of handheld electronic devices while operating a motor vehicle for any use other than important voice calls, without limiting use by passengers.”

They have been able to recruit a few Washington state lawmakers who have agreed to help get wireless carriers on board and install the software. Some of these lawmakers have also agreed to aid in presenting a bill before the legislature in the next session that would require phone restrictions on teen drivers, with an eventual goal of all drivers in the United States, and beyond.

They’re also seeking private and government funding for the non-profit foundation.

Technology and Car Accidents

Though, in theory, this may sound like a solution, there are obstacles as with anything in life. One of the major stopping points is how the technology works and whether it is compliant with current law. The other is getting the telephone providers on board.

  • Law – Currently federal law prohibits any blocking of cell phone signal transmissions. This of course is in regards to calling 911 whether the phone is moving or not. This may sound like an easy thing to get around, but some are suggesting that the issue is a little more complicated and that getting this sort of technology change through on a national level is a serious up hill battle.
  • Companies – Putting software onto phones that make the user not use their product is not likely a good selling point for a company. They may agree that cell phone use while driving is a bad thing, that doesn’t mean they’ll jump on board with taking away the device the companies have spent so much time and money making the person addicted to.
  • Choice – There may also be a problem with not allowing people the choice to make the wrong decision, particularly in a country that attempts to convince people that they are in some manner free. Chip away at that fragile perception of freedom and there may ba a backlash.
  • Pirates – Of course people are going to resist and this may just increase the black market in phones. There’s already a small industry of hardware savvy people who, for a small fee, unlock phones and manipulate software. Those people are begging for this law to pass.

All-in-all, it’s just a terrible idea to drive distracted just like it’s a terrible idea to drive drunk. The fines are disproportionate, but when pedestrians and other cars car are hit because of it, the results are the same. Please just turn off the phone and drive.

If you or someone you know has suffered a serious personal injury after getting into a car accident with a distracted driver, then you need skilled legal council to represent you to assure that you get the compensation you deserve. Call the Seattle car accident lawyers at Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Washington Personal Injury Lawyers: Red Light Runner Injures 2 Elder Pedestrians

pedestrian accidents, pedestrian injury, personal injury, washington personal injury lawyer

July 30th, 2010: Law Blogger

1st and Roy on Queen AnneNot every intersection can have a red light running camera in it. Well, not yet anyway. As impatient or inattentive drivers cause car accidents and personal injuries by running red lights, the higher the chances of every intersection with a light having a camera. But camera or no camera, that didn’t help two elderly people last night on Lower Queen Anne.

The accident happened at 7 pm as the car was going west on the one-way Roy Street at First Avenue North near Seattle Center. There are no lights for several blocks on the three-lane road before the intersection.

Seattle police say a man in his 80s and a woman in her 70s were in the crosswalk when the car hit them. The male victim rolled up on the hood of the car and hit his head on the windshield.

Witnesses told police the driver had run a red light, then hit the pedestrians.

Medics rushed to the scene and treated the two victims, then took them to Harborview Medical Center with serious personal injuries that thankfully are listed as non-life threatening.

Police examined the driver and saw no signs of DUI. They then released the driver and did not reveal what citations, if any, they issued at the scene.

We hope that the two injured people recover swiftly and fully.

These kinds of pedestrian accidents almost always cause very serious injuries, but when a senior citizen is involved, what would have been a serious injury could lead to death or permanent disability. Because of bone density loss in most human bodies these types of accidents generally lead to broken bones that could take an exceptional amount of time to heal or may need replacing all together exposing the victim to infection.

If you or someone you are close to has been injured in an accident it is important that you find a skilled legal professional to represent you with insurance companies and healthcare providers to assure that you get the care and compensation you deserve. Call the Washington Car Accident Attorneys at Phillips Webster for a consultation.

Learn More About:

Medical Malpractice Lawyers: Acupuncture Patient Left on Table as Bellevue Clinic Closes

Medical Malpractice, medical malpractice attorneys, Washington medical malpractice lawyers

July 29th, 2010: Law Blogger

Accupunture Gone WildCustomer service just isn’t what it used to be. Small clinics that offer relaxation services often only have one or two certified people on staff, the rest of the employees many times don’t require much more than a high school diploma or, thinking about it, anything more than a winning smile. Perhaps that’s why a poor woman in Bellevue was left forgotten as the staff went home.

The patient, a 47 year-old woman, was receiving acupuncture treatments in her back on Tuesday afternoon and, as many acupuncturists do for relaxation purposes, was left alone in a room. But minutes turned into more than an hour. Finally when it reached about 7:30 pm, the woman knew something was wrong.

So she stepped out of the room and to her surprise the alarms started going off. The whole staff had left and even remembered to set the alarms, but yet had not checked all of the rooms.

Realizing she was trapped inside, police say she removed the needles from her back and then called 911. The police arrived and were able to get her out.

Now the Washington State Health Department (WADOH) has confirmed that they have just opened an investigation into the clinic

Bellingham Police says it’s not a criminal case and will instead leave the issue to WADOH.

“Patients have an expectation to be treated in a safe way and that care meet standards of professional conduct,” a WADOH spokesperson said. “We are investigating the events in this case.”

The department said that it’s early in their investigation, but say the acupuncturist is licensed and that the patient was fine.

As you can imagine, the acupuncturist has not yet spoken to the media.

As with any medical procedure there is a reasonable expectation of competence and professionalism at all times. This, I think we can all agree, would probably be categorized as “not very professional.” We’re glad the patient is okay.

If you or a loved one have found that you have been seriously injured or killed because of a medical error it is still your right to seek adequate compensation for your pain and suffering to assure that another patient will not have to go through what you are. Call the Medical Malpractice Lawyers at Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Airplane Accident Lawyers: Pilot Dead, Passenger Personally Injured in Small Plane Wreck

airplane accident lawyers, airplane accidents, plane crash, plane crash attorneys

July 29th, 2010: Law Blogger

Pierce County Plane CrashSmall planes seem to crash all of the time, but proportionately to cars, crashes are rare. It’s because pilots have a tremendous amount of training and regulation compared to drivers. That’s why only around 50% of airplane accidents are due to operator error as compared to 97% of car wrecks. That makes mechanical error just as likely a cause of what might have brought down an small plane today before it could fully take off.

The aircraft crashed at Kapowsin Field in rural Pierce County near Graham, officials said. Witnesses at the scene said the plane was attempting a takeoff when it spun suddenly and cart-wheeled down the runway, then took a nose-dive into a grassy field some 300 feet off of the runway.

The pilot was found dead at the scene, said Tony Judd of the Graham Fire Department.

The passenger was taken to the trauma center at Tacoma General Hospital with personal injuries, but was reported to be alert, conscious and speaking with rescue personnel on the scene of the crash.

Both the pilot and passenger were reported to be men in their 60s.

Residents of other hangers at the small airport say the pilot was renting a hangar and had been taxiing his “small kit plane,” described as a Zodiac Model CH 601 HDS, up and down the runway for the past several weeks, but hadn’t taken off until Thursday.

Private pilots on the scene who regularly use the airstrip said they believed this was the first time up in the air for this plane.

The Pierce County Medical Examiner’s office is still working on notifying the pilot’s family before releasing his name. Officials with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the National Transportation Safety Board are at the scene to investigate the cause of the crash.

If you or someone you know has been seriously injured in an aviation accident then you need skilled representation to assure that you receive the compensation you deserve. Call the law firm of Phillips Webster for your free consultation

Learn More About:

Washington Trucking Accident Lawyer: Woman Killed When Hit By Commercial Truck

trucking accident attorneys, trucking accident lawyers, Trucking Accidents, Wrongful Death, wrongful death lawyer

July 29th, 2010: Law Blogger

Mukilteo Pedestrian AccidentMany seniors choose to not drive everywhere and instead, for health reasons, to walk to places like the grocery store and other errands. Their limited movement and reaction time may put them at higher risk for pedestrian accidents. Though there are limited details, this may have been a factor in the death of a 73 year-old pedestrian this morning.

The accident happened just after 7:45 a.m. at the intersection of Harbor Point Blvd. SW and Possession Way. A commercial flatbed truck hit the woman.

Medical crews rushed to the scene of the injury accident, but they were not able to save her and she was pronounced dead at the scene.

The Mukilteo Police confirmed that the accident is not a hit and run and that the driver of the commercial truck remained at the scene and was very cooperative.

The identity of the woman has not been released due pending notification of the family. Our condolences go out to the friends and family of the deceased.

A pedestrian accident that seems minor under normal circumstances could be serious, even fatal when an elderly person is involved, particularly women who are known to have more brittle bones in their later years than men. This is why it is so important that people are incredibly careful when driving in high pedestrian areas and near bus stops.

If you or someone you know has be involved in a commercial trucking accident, the trucking company has an experienced legal team on their side and so should you. Call the Seattle car accident lawyers at Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Washington Car Accident Lawyers: Woman Suffers Personal Injuries in SUV Rollover Accident

Car accidents, SUV accident, SUV rollover crash, Washington car accident lawyer

July 29th, 2010: Law Blogger

hwy 20 just S of Monkey Hill RoadOne of the biggest challenges some people face on the road is being patient with other drivers. Everyone has a different philosophy and ability when it comes to driving. Some are slower than others and that’s where patience comes in. This may have been a factor in an accident on North Whidbey Island yesterday morning.

According to the Washington State Patrol, Fancy Lawson, 24, of Oak Harbor, was driving a 1998 Lincoln Navigator northbound on Highway 20 just south of Monkeyhill Road.

The car in the left lane was going too slow for Lawson, so she attempted to pass another vehicle on the right, but lost control and left the road to the right. She must have overcompensated by either turning the wheel sharply or slammed on the brakes, because the SUV rolled end over end, a very complicated way to crash a large SUV. While the vehicle was rolling, Lawson was partially ejected.

Lawson suffered serious personal injuries and was transported to Island Hospital in Anacortes for treatment. There, she was stabilized, but they determined that her injuries were severe enough to airlifted to Harborview Medical Center in Seattle. She was listed in satisfactory condition Wednesday afternoon.

The State Patrol reported that an illegal pass was the cause of the accident and that possible charges are pending.

Passing on the right hand side of the road is extremely hazardous and that’s why it’s illegal. The reason for the hazard is that the right hand side of the road and the shoulder often contains more debris and abrupt pavement edges can form through erosion. These two factors are enough to spell disaster for any vehicle of any size.

If someone you know has suffered serious personal injuries in a auto accident due to the negligence of another driver you will need a skilled attorney to assure that your best interests are represented so that you get the compensation you deserve. Call Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Toyota Recall Lawyers: 412,000 Avalons and Lexus Recalled For Steering Failure

Defective Toyota vehicles, Toyota recall, Toyota Recall Attorneys, Toyota recall lawyers

July 29th, 2010: Law Blogger

Toyota RecallYou may remember Toyota from earlier this year. They’re the car company that was the number one car manufacturer and seller in the world for almost a decade until it was found that 8 to 10 million of their cars had deadly sudden acceleration problems and that they’d (woops) actually known about and (double woops) tried to hide it.

The nearly 10 million cars Toyota has recalled worldwide in the last years is almost as many vehicles as were sold by all manufacturers in the U.S. last year. The recalls involved floor mats that could jam accelerators, sticking gas pedals, brakes and other components.

This led to the highest fine in history levied by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a whopping $16.4 million…okay, not that whopping and probably less than the car company made last week, but still, it’s a start.

What Toyota learned from all this is that avoiding an issue probably isn’t the best policy. They also found out that recalling almost every Toyota in the world at the same time may not have been the smoothest move either. That’s why they are now doing things in stages as the problems arise.

Consumers are finding out that Toyotas may not actually be most reliable cars on the road as Toyota might tell us on the commercials. This was, once again, proven today when Toyota announced the recall of 412,000 of its mid range and luxury Avalon and Lexus Models.

Toyota Recall

Their recall is for a steering problem in 373,000 Avalon sedans built for the 2000 to 2004 model years and 39,000 Lexus LX 470 vehicles from 2003 to 2007. The company said that if the vehicle experienced a severe impact to the front wheels, such as striking a pothole, the steering shaft could disengage over time.

The Japanese car manufacturer said it plans to replace the steering column bracket on the vehicles, a procedure that takes about 2 hours to complete. Toyota said it will notify owners by mail beginning in late August to take their vehicles to a dealer to have the work done at no charge.

“It is just another day, another Toyota recall,” said Rebecca Lindland, an analyst at IHS Automotive.

Steve St. Angelo, Toyota’s chief quality officer for North America, said the automaker “is continuing to work diligently to address safety issues wherever they arise and to strengthen our global quality assurance operations so that Toyota owners can be confident in the safety of their vehicles.”

Nothing better than a little more spokesperson lip-service to get us through the day. Nonetheless, the massive recalls have taken their toll on Toyota’s sales in the U.S.

In the first half of 2010, Toyota’s sales (not including those of the Lexus and Scion brands) actually rose 8.6% compared to an overall gain of 16.7% for the entire industry. Its overall US market share has slumped to 13.2%, compared with 14.1% during the same period in 2009 before the recall.

“The diehard Toyota people won’t care about the recalls. Where Toyota is struggling is with the conquest, or new buyers. These people are asking why they should buy a new Toyota,” Lindland said. “The recalls have a negative impact on long-term growth. It is a real challenge for Toyota.”

Certainly no one in the US is shedding a tear for Toyota and their sales and though it is obvious that some people are conscious of their safety, other Americans gladly forgo the reports of massive mechanical short-comings in the face of Zero-Down, Zero-Interest sales incentives. And of course the commercials that say things like, “Most reliable on the road,” and “Best resale value in its class.” Both of these claims, not to go as far to say that they are lies, are not particularly true either. But of course, the lack of truth in advertising is another thing Americans got over long ago.

Toyota Lawsuits

Toyota LawsuitToyota faces hundreds of lawsuits arising from its problems with sudden acceleration and sticking gas pedals and it is the target of intense scrutiny by federal safety regulators and Congress. And that has caused the automaker to take a cautious approach when problems crop up in its vehicles, which leads to large and expensive recalls.

Today’s recalls came less than two weeks after the company was subpoenaed by a federal grand jury to produce documents related to steering problems in its vehicles.

These recalls also come around two weeks after Toyota told federal regulators that another steering problem that could affect 749,685 Corolla and Matrix models isn’t a safety defect, thus no recall is required.

In February, the NHTSA opened an investigation into 2009 and 2010 Corolla and Matrix models after receiving 168 reports that the electric power steering in the vehicles was prone to drifting or locking up, especially at highway speeds.

The lawsuits and reports of very serious and potentially fatal design flaws in Toyota vehicles seem to pour in weekly. The American federal regulators and the NHTSA of course will not go as far as to ban the sale of new Toyotas, but there needs to be a serious review of the manufacturing of these vehicles to see if corners are deliberately being cut at the detriment of American drivers.

If you or a loved one has been effected by the steering problems on the Toyota Avalon or Lexus 470 resulting in a car accident or serious personal injury then it is very important that you find a lawyer with experience in product liability lawsuits that can represent you and assure that you get the compensation you deserve. Call Phillips Webster for a free consultation and to find out your legal options.

Learn More About:

Washington Personal Injury Lawyers: 2 Teens Seek Apology After Being Hit by DUI Driver

DUI accident, personal injury, personal injury attorney, washington personal injury lawyer

July 28th, 2010: Law Blogger

10th and Walnut in SpokaneSeeking an apology from drunk drivers is something that some victims choose to do and some victims just seek justice. But when it comes to DUI, some victims aren’t alive to hear it. In the case of two teenage girls in Spokane, they not only are luckily alive to hear it, they welcome it.

Nikki Hart, 15, says she was walking with her friend on 10th and Walnut on the South Hill of Spokane on Saturday when they were both hit by a truck.

According to police, the two girls were hit by a drunk driver named Mark Bear Dog, who they say was also under the influence of marijuana and admitted to them he was driving drunk.

Witnesses said that Bear Dog was driving his ford F-250 pickup, going about 30-35 mph and made no attempt to stop.

The girls were rushed to the hospital with personal injuries and the suspect went to jail. Now Nikki says she wants an apology.

“My friend doesn’t remember what happened and I do and it just makes it, I think pretty scary,” she said.

Hart came home from the hospital Tuesday afternoon. She says her jaw is hurting, she still feels pain in her hip and neck, and is scraped up from head to toe.

Nikki’s parents hope that the girl’s harrowing ordeal will cause others to think twice before driving under the influence.

“I could have lost my daughter, and I had to go to the hospital seeing her strapped down. I had to be strong for her,” said Nikki’s mom, Kelly St.Paul.

Bear Dog was arrested and faces one count of vehicular assault.

We’re glad to hear that the girls will recover fully.

DUI is an expensive and time consuming offense, but vehicular assault is a real crime that could be accompanied by real jail time. Especially if it is not the first offense or the accused has a criminal background. We know nothing about the suspect in this case, but we hope that he at least agrees to apologize.

If you or someone you know have sustained serious personal injuries in a dui accident then you need experienced counsel to protect your interests with the insurance companies and health care providers. Call the Seattle car accident attorneys at Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About: