Washington Law Blog
Personal Injury, Car Accidents, Trucking Accidents,
motorcycle accidents and consumer law blog...

  • * First Name:
  • * Last Name:
  • * Email:
  • * Phone Number:
  • Comment:
  • Accept Terms *
  • *Denotes Required Field

Law Blog Categories

Car Accidents
3 Reasons to Hire Phillips Webster

Our attorneys have decades of experience negotiating with insurance companies regarding all types of vehicle accidents. If you have been injured in a wreck, contact us today.

  1. We represent EVERYONE in need anywhere in Washington - Minor and Major Injuries
  2. Experienced trial attorneys that will fight for your right to recover compensation
  3. FREE Case Review and we only get paid if you get paid
Learn more about our:
Seattle Car Accident Lawyers

Verdicts & Settlements

$20 MILLION - Commercial Injury
Confidential settlement for a commercial injury case

$19  Million - Grant of Coverage
Grant of coverage in insurance coverage case

$2 MILLION - INSURANCE BAD FAITH
Settlement in insurance bad faith case

$1.5 MILLION - CAR ACCIDENT WRONGFUL DEATH
Vancouver, Washington car accident that resulted in a death

$1 MILLION - DUI ACCIDENT VICTIM
Settlement for young man hit by a drunk driver

Our jury trial experience shows in the results we get both inside and outside of the courtroom.

More Verdicts and Settlements

 

Posts Tagged ‘defective products’

Recall Warning: Lifescan OneTouch SureStep Test Strips Yield False Results

defective product attorneys, defective products, recall

March 1st, 2010: Law Blogger

Defective Product LawyersThe technology for testing blood glucose (sugar) levels which aid in helping diabetics control their insulin levels has made major strides in the last decade. The painful thumbtack has been replaced by high tech digital reading devices. Though far more sanitary, pleasant, and convenient, technology has its flaws. When gauging the insulin levels, a mechanical error can have disastrous results.

Now Lifescan has issued a voluntary recall of 8 items in their product line. Lifescan is a subsidiary of medical equipment and pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson.

On their website, Johnson & Johnson confirmed the recall and elaborated that the Lifescan Onetouch meter that these strips go to was discontinued both in Canada and the US in 2006, but the company remained providing strips for them. They added that their new Onetouch is vastly different technology and superior, suggesting that it is time for an upgrade.

Lifescan OneTouch SureStep Recall Details

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued an open letter to the public and health care providers such as nursing homes, hospitals, clinics, and other facilities regarding using SureStep®Pro®, SureStep®Flexx® or OneTouch® SureStep® Hospital Systems. These glucose measuring systems use SureStep®Pro® Test Strips.

The full list of recalled products include:

  • 100-ct – OneTouch SureStep  # 2969251
  • 100-ct – OneTouch SureStep  # 2969798
  • 100-ct – OneTouch SureStep  # 2982369
  • 100-ct – OneTouch SureStep  # 2983467
  • 50-ct – OneTouch SureStep  # 2969795
  • 50-ct – OneTouch SureStep  # 2982566
  • 50-ct – Medicare/Mail Order # 2969481
  • 50-ct – Medicare/Mail Order # 2998193

These products may produce false low readings when the blood glucose reading is greater than 400 mg/dL. The FDA and LifeScan has advised healthcare facilities of the appropriate actions to take in order to continue to use these SureStepPro Test Strips.

It has been advised that healthcare facilities with access to alternative means of testing should consider discontinue using SureStep Systems until non-defective replacement test strips are available.

Consumers are advised to use alternative methods if available. If none are available, continue using the strips and contact a physician if levels are greater than 400 mg/dL.

Lifescan OneTouch SureStep False Readings Side Effects

Defective Medical DevicesRecently in February, 2010 a diabetic professor at a college in Washington state was standing in the hall of his college and he had no idea where he was. He had gone into diabetic shock. He approached a colleague as if they were a stranger and ask the way outside. She realized by his glossed over look that there was something seriously wrong.

In the hour that followed medical crews arrived and proceeded to physically fight with the professor as his worst nightmares rushed to his head, not being able to recognize that they were trying to help him. They got him sedated and to the hospital just in time. He very well could have slipped into a coma. This is an extreme case, but extreme cases are what happens when a diabetic’s warning system isn’t working effectively.

The side effects that tell a diabetic that they have not properly regulated their glucose and insulin levels can be very subtle. As you might realize from the story about the professor above, the side effects can sneak up and have dire results. Watch for some of these side effects when using the Lifescan Ontouch Surestep product line:

  • shaking
  • sweating
  • irritability
  • headache
  • tingling
  • hunger
  • blurred vision
  • dizziness and confusion
  • numbness of the lips
  • nausea or vomiting
  • fast heart rate
  • sudden tiredness
  • seizures
  • pale appearance
  • frequent sighing
  • personality change
  • confusion or poor concentration
  • loss of consciousness

Protect Yourself from Harm from Recalled Products

This is a voluntary recall by Lifescan because of reports from healthcare providers and consumers. Though Johnson & Johnson has stopped producing these machines does not mean that they are not liable for their correct operation, particularly in life threatening situations such as the most dangerous of side effects of misread insulin levels in diabetics.

If you or a loved one have found yourself a victim of this recall or other defective medical devices it is important that you get representation that has proven experience with defective product litigation when dealing with large companies that have endless resources. Call Phillips Webster to review your legal rights and find out your legal options.

Criminal Charges Filed against KV Pharmaceuticals for Defective Products

Defective Drugs, defective drugs attorneys, defective products

February 26th, 2010: Law Blogger

Defective DrugsIf there were any reservations as to the lengths the pharmaceutical industry will go to make a profit, then the settlement agreed upon by St. Louis based KV Pharmaceutical Company may help quell those reservations.

In 2008, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) told KV to stop making some time-release cough, cold, and gastrointestinal drugs. Yet, KV continued to make the drugs. This prompted the agency seized more than $24 million in unapproved products in July of that year.

In a statement given by KV to the Washington Post, the settlement include $25.8 million in fines and restitution, $2.3 million of which will be paid to the federal government. Ethex (a division of KV) also will not contest a $1.8 million administrative forfeiture, it said.

It sounds like a lot of money, but in the pharmaceutical business for a single company all of those figures added together amounts to about one week’s profit. Not a month or year, one single week.

Giant Pills

KV had to issue repeated recalls in late 2008 and early 2009 because some batches of products contained pills that were oversized. This lead some patients to overdose accidentally. That’s right, bigger pills that contained more than the recommended dosage.

Most of the recalled products were made by Ethex, but some were made by the Ther-Rx specialty drug division. Ther-Rx has recently become experts at recalls, having to recall 20 of its products in the last two months. But that is tiny amount compared to Ethex (not to be confused with the word “ethics”) with 156 recalls in the last month.

These products range from cold medicines to morphine to oxycodone. Some of these drugs are extremely dangerous when a person overdoses. Particularly if it is a simple cold medicine innocently administered to a child.

Do not fret though, Ethecs has been trumped by ethics and will no longer be around to harm people.

Criminal Charges

Defective ProductsKV said Thursday that it will shut down the Ethex generic drug unit and plead guilty to criminal charges alleging Ethex failed to promptly inform regulators about dangerous manufacturing problems.

The charges concern Ethex’s failure to file field alerts, or urgent notices about potential safety threats, with the Food and Drug Administration. The alerts concern two drugs: dextroamphetamine, an ingredient in the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder drug Adderall, and propafenone, which is used to treat cardiac arrhythmia, or irregular heartbeats.

Please keep in mind that when criminal charges are filed against a large corporation people rarely go to jail.

Spin, Spin, Spin

KV is shutting down Ethex Corp. because after the plea it would probably be excluded from government programs. The company will also pay a total of $27.6 million to resolve a government investigation into its business, which has had to recall dozens of drugs because its manufacturing practices did not meet federal standards.

“This settlement marks an important milestone in our efforts to restore normalized business operations at KV, regain full regulatory and legal compliance, and set KV on a new path moving forward,” KV interim Chief Executive Officer David Van Vliet said in a statement to Business Week

Yet, there was no apology issued to either the FDA or consumers issued either in statements or on the KV website.

Forgiveness

KV is still not able to resume sales of generic drugs affected by the recalls. Along with the closing of Ethex, this will dip considerably into their profits. Yet, Wall Street still responded positively to news that the investigations are being resolved.

Shares of KV Pharmaceutical rallied in late trading, closing up 32 cents, or 11 percent, at $3.33. Good news, because beyond failing the confidence and safety of its consumers, all that really matters is KV’s stock prices.

If you or a loved one find that you have been affected by defective drugs in any way, it is important that you get representation right away. Call Phillips Webster for a consultation on your legal rights.

Airbag Deployment Injures Teen When He Hit a Deer

defective products, injuries, Washington auto accident lawyer

February 17th, 2010: Law Blogger

highway 2 two miles east of leavenworthLeavenworth – Two teens were driving on Highway 2 two miles east of Leavenworth at around 6:15 pm when a deer jumped in front of the car and they hit it.

The airbag deployed, injuring the driver in an undisclosed injury. The passenger suffered injures to the face, said Washington State Patrol.

Both teens were rushed to a hospital in Chelan where they were treated for their injuries.

There have been many reported cases of injury, not from the wreck, but from airbags, the very thing that is supposed to protect the driver from harm. Many consumers have chosen to turn off their passenger side airbags for the chance of injuring or even killing minor and elderly passengers.

If you or a loved one are injured as a result of a defective product, call Phillips Webster for a consultation on your legal rights and options.

Tioga Inc. Begins Phase 3 Clinical Trial on Asimadoline; IBS Pain Killer

Defective Drugs, defective drugs attorneys, defective products

February 17th, 2010: Law Blogger

Defective Drugs - Phillips WebsterTioga Pharmaceuticals Inc is a pharmaceutical company that is following the trend of the industry as a “virtual” pharmaceutical company. They are essentially a small team (one person or more) that are venture capital acquiring machines that have a concept and farm out all of the production, testing, and lab work to contractors. It is highly profitable, especially when the drug hits the market. Tioga Pharmaceuticals Inc. has just secured $18 million dollars from various sources and is going into the third trial of its new drug to treat Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).

The trial, one of two registration trials required for approval in the United States, is a 600-subject randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose clinical trial in D-IBS patients. The trial is scheduled to begin at 120 sites in the United States next month.

Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)

IBS is suffered by millions of people around the world. It is a disease that makes bowel movements painful and limits the sufferer’s comfort being away from facilities for extended periods of time. Some of the symptoms of IBS are:

  • Mucus in the stool
  • Bloating and gas
  • Constipation
  • Diarrhea, regularly or predictably
  • Immediate need to have another bowel movement after you’ve already had one
  • Sudden and strong urge to have a bowel movement
  • Abdominal pain and cramping that diminish after the movement

Asimadoline - Phillips Webster

What is Asimadoline?

Asimadoline is a drug that is listed as an analgesic or a certain type of pain killer. It is described by Tioga Pharmacueticals Inc. as:

“Asimadoline is an orally administered small molecule that is a highly selective, peripherally restricted, kappa opioid receptor agonist.”

A kappa opioid receptors (k-Opioid receptors) are widely distributed throughout the brain, spinal cord, and in pain neurons. They are particularly related to the central nervous system and gastrointestinal tract. Asimadoline suppresses the signals sent through the k-Opioid receptors.

What was the result of other clinical trials?

There have been many since 1998 when the drug was first starting to be tested. Animal trials had mixed results as they always do when testing proper dosage and extreme effects of over dosage.

Patient trials reported by the National Institute of Health (NIH) have been generally positive when treating IBS, but yet, the side effects of such studies were not given. Tioga Inc. also reported no side effects when they described phase 2 clinical trials:

“In a 596-subject Phase 2b clinical trial asimadoline demonstrated statistically significant results in the treatment of D-IBS patients with at least moderate pain across multiple parameters including endpoints of pain, urgency, frequency and bloating in both males and females. A therapeutic benefit was observed within the first month of treatment and was sustained for the three month duration of the trial. Asimadoline appeared to be well tolerated with no adverse events occurring in a dose-dependent manner throughout the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging clinical trial.”

This is odd when there are currently no drugs in existence that have zero side effects, particularly a painkiller.

What are the side effects to Asimadoline?

Asimadoline is related to a whole family of drugs that act in a similar way to other forms of opioid receptors including Butorphanol, Menthol, and the popular over-the-counter party drug Salvinorin A.

In clinical trials with other similar drugs of the same family, there has been clear evidence to the tendency to cause hallucinations and other psychological effects. Hallucinations can go either way. As a hallucination is often sudden and may be perceived by the person as real there are several outcomes. They can cause a euphoric state and a sense of peace. They can also cause panic and rash sudden decisions that could be a detriment to the patient and others around them.

Though Asimadoline has not been registered with the FDA yet, the FDA may require further studies to test for the side effects under normal and adverse conditions. There has also been no trials as to the effects of the drug when taken with other medication.

Defective Drugs

If you or a family member are currently suffering from the adverse side effects of a medication that has been proscribed to you should know your legal rights. Call Phillips Webster for a consultation on how to protect yourself and your legal recourse.

Study Finds Serious Side Effects to Transvaginal Surgical Mesh

defective products, medical malpractice attorneys

February 12th, 2010: Law Blogger

In a recent study released by the Department of Gynecology Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine in France, serious side effects were found in 81% of the 104 women tested. 38% of the cases showed evidence of the most serious side effects. In fact, the FDA received more than 1000 reports of problems with the products between 2005 and 2008 alone. These numbers show a significant flaw and bring into question the testing methodology of not only the manufacturer and distributor, but also the role of the FDA.

What Is a Transvaginal Surgical Mesh For?

transvaginal surgical meshMedical Terms – According to Urologist, Dr. Dirk Drent, the bladder is supported by a specific part of the endopelvic fascia called the pubocervical fascia. The pubocervical fascia extends from the pubis anteriorly to the cervix of the uterus posteriorly. The pubocervical fascia acts like a hammock to support the bladder in the correct position. The anterior (front) end of the pubocervical fascia supports the bladder neck and urethra and the posterior (back) end of the pubocervical fascia supports the bladder.

Layman’s Terms – Basically, a wide and thin piece of tissue connect to the front and back of the inside of a woman holds the bladder and uterus up and in position. Pregnancy and other issues can detach the front tissue connection, various other issues can disconnect the back. The tissue has also been known to rip. Regardless, a transvaginal mesh is needed to replace the damage.

What is a Transvaginal Surgical Mesh?

transvaginal meshIt is a surgical device that Dr. Drent likens to a hammock. It is made out of prolene, a synthetic, monfilament, nonabsorbable polypropylene suture (a finely constructed synthetic net commonly used for skin closure). That’s what it does, it is a net that holds up the bladder and uterus to avoid discomfort and urinary problems.

How do I know I need one?

Generally your doctor will know you need one by your symptoms:

  • Pain
  • Discomfort
  • Frequent urination
  • Limited urination

These can be symptoms of many other ailments so consult your physician or specialist for a proper examination and diagnosis.

What problems can Transvaginal Surgical Meshes cause?

The meshes seem to be vary hard on a woman’s body and as the above study has shown, they have not turned out to be an appropriate answer to this fairly common feminine problem. These side effects cause:

  • erosion of vaginal tissue
  • infection
  • pain
  • urinary problems
  • recurrence of Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) and Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
  • perforations of the bowel, bladder or blood vessels
  • vaginal scarring
  • mesh erosion

FDA Falls Short

As mentioned and linked to above, the FDA issued a warning, but in now way stopped the procedure or attempted to control the use and distribution of the devices. With almost one woman a day being reported with complications regarding the device, one would think that the FDA would act quickly and decisively. Instead they released a stern warning with a set of recommendations:

Obtain specialized training for each mesh placement technique, and be aware of its risks.

  • Be vigilant for potential adverse events from the mesh, especially erosion and infection.
  • Watch for complications associated with the tools used in transvaginal placement, especially bowel, bladder and blood vessel perforations.
  • Inform patients that implantation of surgical mesh is permanent, and that some complications associated with the implanted mesh may require additional surgery that may or may not correct the complication.
  • Inform patients about the potential for serious complications and their effect on quality of life, including pain during sexual intercourse, scarring, and narrowing of the vaginal wall (in POP repair).
  • Provide patients with a written copy of the patient labeling from the surgical mesh manufacturer, if available.

Who Manufactures and Distributes These Devices?

They include some of the largest names in the pharmaceutical equipment industry such as:

  • Johnson & Johnson
  • American Medical Systems
  • Boston Scientific
  • Ethicon division of Johnson & Johnson
  • Gynecare division of Johnson & Johnson
  • Bard

These are multibillion dollar corporations that know the effects of their devices, were the first to receive the light warning from the FDA, and still chose to ignore the evidence that their products were harming thousands of women in the US and around the world. At some point they need to stop profiting off of a product with an 81% patient side effect ratio.

Where Do I Get Help?

These products can be potentially life threatening if left unchecked. If you or a loved one is complaining of the symptoms stated above and have had a transvaginal mesh procedure, you need a representative that is on your side. Call Phillips Webster for a consultation and a review of your legal options.

Pain Pumps Take Away Pain but Cause Lifelong Suffering From Chondrolysis

defective products, pain and suffering, washington defective drug attorney

February 8th, 2010: Law Blogger

JusticeA week ago the first of what is expected to be an avalanche of lawsuits came through in Oregon with the jury awarding $4.75 million dollars to Matthew Beale, a father of four residing in Portland, Oregon, from I-Flow, a post surgical pain pump manufacturer. It is one lawsuit out of what the New York Times reported as 119 more cases involving 412 patients for which I-Flow, is a defendant.

The dispute was over whether the I-Flow pump caused Beale to contract postarthroscopic glenohumeral chondrolysis (PAGCL) or chondrolysis, a loss of cartilage in the joint.

The Cause

In the late 90’s the pain pump was introduced as a safe and effective way to control joint, in particular shoulder, post-surgery pain for sports injuries. Joints are held together by cartilage, which is comprised of cells called chondrocytes.

The pump is inserted in the area and dispenses a local anesthetic, regulating the use mechanically so to eliminate the need for monitoring by a nurse or doctor. This reduces time in the hospital and most importantly, cost.

The problem is that to maximize the relief, the anesthetic was pumped directly into the joint rather than the area. According to studies done by Dr. Constance R. Chu of the McGowen Institute of Regenerative Medicine in the University of Pittsburg, certain anesthetics, when applied locally, kill chrondrocytes.

Bupivacaine is an anesthetic that is produced by AstraZeneca, another defendant in a series of lawsuits regarding this issue. Apparently bupivacaine is the commonly used anesthetic used by pain pumps.

When the anesthetic is applied directly to the joint, according to Dr. Chu, the reaction is rapid. The cartilage is killed leaving the joint to function bone on bone causing excruciating pain, limiting the use of the whole limb, and reducing the patient to a lifetime of associated problems.
Cartilage

Follow the Wagging Blame Finger

In 2006, when the research spearheaded by Dr. Chu came down, including an important patient study and one done on rabbits , I-Flow changed the directions on its packaging inserts and posted a bulletin on their website in August of 2008.

Unfortunately their product was already in use for a decade by the time their warning came out and more than two years after the initial study done by Dr. Chu was published. This is part of the argument of the lawsuits that they were far too slow to react to the studies and allowed their product to continue to effect patients.

The California based I-Flow was purchased for $325 million last year by household good behemoth Kimberly-Clark Corp. (producer of Kleenex and Huggies brands) who, according to the Oregonian, made just over $2 billion dollars in 2009. A spokesman for the company told the Oregonian that they are very disappointed about the outcome and plan to appeal.

AstraZeneca told the New York Times that they deny permitting the use of their product in pain pumps and plan to fight any lawsuits.

According to Beale’s attorneys, the doctor that applied pain pump to the joint was encouraged by I-Flow to apply the catheter of the pump directly to the joint for a more effective treatment and a way to lower costs. I-Flow of course deny that allegation.

The FDA, posted a warning on their website in 2009. According to the New York Times, they had been approached by another pain pump manufacturer, but had not approved the procedure applying the anesthetic directly to the joint.

The Solution

On top of the $4.75 million dollar settlement that went to Matthew Beale, $1.275 was also awarded to his wife Krista Beale because from now on she literally has to be his right hand. Though Matthew Beale still maintains a job at a brokerage firm he contends that he will not be able to sustain his career to retirement age because of his ailment.

If you have had a procedure to your joint since 1998 and used a pain pump and are now affected by pain, discomfort, limited movement, loss of movement, loss of livelihood, or your personal life has been adversely changed by this procedure contact Phillips Webster to find out your legal options.

Toyota Issues Massive Vehicle Recall in United States

Avalon, Camry, defective floor mats, defective products, Lexus, Prius, Tacoma, Toyota recall, Toyota recall lawyers, Tundra

September 30th, 2009: Washington Law Blogger

Toyota announced today that it is initiating its largest recall in history in the United States, and it’s estimated that as many as 3.8 million vehicles could be affected by this announcement. The reason for the recall is the presence of a defective removable all-weather floor mat on the driver’s side of these vehicles. Apparently, this floor mat has been causing the accelerator in the affected models to stick, which creates a situation of immediate and extreme danger. As a result, Toyota recall lawyers are beginning to field inquiries so that drivers can obtain an understanding of their legal rights and options.

Both Toyota and the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) are investigating the issue and are working towards having a solution in place that will be announced to the public as soon as possible. In the meantime, officials are advising those who drive these affected models to remove the floor mats as soon as possible. Those models being recalled include:

  • Toyota Camry – 2007-10 models
  • Toyota Avalon – 2005-10 models
  • Toyota Prius – 2004-09 models
  • Toyota Tacoma – 2005-10 models
  • Toyota Tundra – 2007-10 models
  • Lexus ES 350 – 2007-10 models
  • Lexus IS 250 – 2006-10
  • Lexus IS 350 – 2006-10

The NHTSA has stated that its preliminary investigation revealed the presence of defective floor mats that appear to be too long for the space provided on the floor of the driver’s side, and this is what is causing accelerators to stick to the floor. The government has received 102 complaints regarding this issue, although the NHTSA declined to comment regarding how many of these complaints involved accidents.

At least four people have been killed already because of these defective floor mats, and Toyota officials have not only recommended that drivers remove the floor mats, but if they encounter irregular accelerations while driving, they should put both feet on the brake pedal and put the car in neutral when it slows down. If the model has an engine stop/start button, the driver should hold that button down for a period of three seconds.

Reports have also indicated that this accelerator sticking problem has led to vehicles speeding up to 120 mph, and if you or someone you love has been harmed as a result of this defect, you need to contact the Toyota recall lawyers at Phillips & Webster immediately to schedule a free initial consultation.

Hydroxycut Products Recalled

attorney, Defective Drugs, defective products, dietary supplements, FDA, Hydroxycut, recall, side effects

May 6th, 2009: Washington Law Blogger

The makers of Hydroxycut announced a recall of 14 products, effective immediately on the heels of scrutiny from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The specific products recalled were:

  • Hydroxycut Regular Rapid Release Caplets
  • Hydroxycut Caffeine-Free Rapid Release Caplets
  • Hydroxycut Hardcore Liquid Capsules
  • Hydroxycut Max Liquid Capsules
  • Hydroxycut Regular Drink Packets
  • Hydroxycut Caffeine-Free Drink Packets
  • Hydroxycut Hardcore Drink Packets (Ignition Stix)
  • Hydroxycut Max Drink Packets
  • Hydroxycut Liquid Shots
  • Hydroxycut Hardcore RTDs (Ready-to-Drink)
  • Hydroxycut Max Aqua Shed
  • Hydroxycut 24
  • Hydroxycut Carb Control
  • Hydroxycut Natural

The products were recalled because of at least 23 reports of serious side effects developing in consumers who purchased more than 9 million containers of it within the past year. The side effects involved serious damage to consumers’ kidneys and livers, and one 19-year-old man died after using Hydroxycut.

Hydroxycut was a popular product line because it marketed itself as a ‘natural weight loss’ solution that used natural products. However, it has yet to be determined which ingredient or ingredients are responsible for these side effects, as the ingredients seem to have changed several times.

If you have been using any of these products, you need to stop using them immediately, as was stated by the FDA. If you’ve been injured as a result of using them, you need to contact the defective drugs lawyers at Phillips & Webster today to schedule a free initial consultation.