FOLLOW US: Twitter facebook
Washington & Nationwide (Toll Free 24/7)
(800) 708-6000
California
(213) 808-6740

Free Case Review

  • * First Name:
  • * Last Name:
  • * Email:
  • * Phone Number:
  • Comment:
  • Accept Terms *
    *Denotes Required Field

News Updates via Email

If you would like to receive our news updates right to your inbox, provide us with your email address. We won't use your email for anything besides sending you news updates from our blog.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Dangerous Drug Information

If you or a loved one has been injured by the side effects of a defective drug, our defective drug attorneys can help you and your family. We are currently investigating the following dangerous drugs:

Drug Side Effects and Injuries

Law Blog Categories

Car Accidents
3 Reasons to Hire Phillips Webster

Our attorneys have decades of experience negotiating with insurance companies regarding all types of vehicle accidents. If you have been injured in a wreck, contact us today.

  1. We represent EVERYONE in need anywhere in Washington - Minor and Major Injuries
  2. Experienced trial attorneys that will fight for your right to recover compensation
  3. FREE Case Review and we only get paid if you get paid
Learn more about our:
Seattle Car Accident Lawyers

Verdicts & Settlements

$20 MILLION - Commercial Injury
Confidential settlement for a commercial injury case

$19  Million - Grant of Coverage
Grant of coverage in insurance coverage case

$2 MILLION - INSURANCE BAD FAITH
Settlement in insurance bad faith case

$1.5 MILLION - CAR ACCIDENT WRONGFUL DEATH
Vancouver, Washington car accident that resulted in a death

$1 MILLION - DUI ACCIDENT VICTIM
Settlement for young man hit by a drunk driver

Our jury trial experience shows in the results we get both inside and outside of the courtroom.

More Verdicts and Settlements

Posts Tagged ‘negligence’

How Do I Prove the Other Driver Was Negligent?

driver negligence, negligence, personal injury, personal injury attorney, personal injury lawyers, washington personal injury attorney, washington personal injury lawyer

April 1st, 2011: Law Blogger

Proving NegligencePeople often don’t realize or don’t think about just how dangerous driving is until they are performing a simple errand in their car and they all of a sudden find themselves surrounded by broken glass and smoke.

As the victims being rushed to the hospital with personal injuries, they often run through in their mind the circumstances of what happened. Many victims come up blank or with only a vague recollection of the details. Other victims have a clear recollection of the incident and know exactly why they are in the state they are in.

Either way, the victim of the accident has a long road in front of them with recovery, which means extensive medical bills, time away from work, pain management, and the possibility of physical therapy due to a devastating permanent injury. This requires compensation on the part of the negligent party, but how exactly do you prove negligence in a personal injury or wrongful death case?

Four Requirements to Proving Negligence

This article may seem fairly simple and cut-and-dry concerning proving negligence. But proving negligence is far from easy in almost all cases, especially when an insurance company is involved. They have legal teams dedicated to making sure that they pay you nothing regardless of who’s at fault.

That is why it is best to leave the proof of negligence to your legal professional, but it is always a good idea to educate yourself in order to understand the process. The first thing your lawyer is going to look at are whether the four general criteria for negligence were or were not met. They are:

1) A duty to refrain some form of conduct or a duty to engage in some conduct

2) The defendant breached that duty

3) The breach actually and proximately caused some harm

4) The plaintiff, as a result of the negligence, sustained damages

What is Duty? (otherwise known as “Duty of Care”) Duty is the first element that must be established to proceed with an action in negligence. This is a social contract expecting individuals to conform to a standard of reasonable care while performing any act that could foreseeably harm others such as driving. The plaintiff (the injured party seeking compensation, i.e., you) must be able to show a duty of care imposed by law, which the defendant (the other driver) has breached. In turn, breaching a duty may subject an individual to liability.

Tools of Proving Negligence

To prove anything it is always a good idea to have some sort of evidence. Physical evidence collected at the scene is perhaps the most concrete. Collection of evidence is fully reviewed in our article “What Kind Of Collision Evidence Do Authorities Collect at the Scene of a Car Accident?” There is also other kinds of evidence as you will see below.

Police Report – This is most likely the first responder to the scene of the accident and they do the initial assessment of the incident. In the police report there are many statements and an officer suggestion of what they thought probably happened based on what their investigation. This is often the only investigation that is done in times of tight budgets or when the accident happens in smaller municipalities with limited access to resources.

Medical Report – This is the assessment of the medical professionals (EMTs and Firemen) that show up to provide critical medical care to injured motorists. The fill out their separate report and sometimes it contradicts what is in other reports, which can work either in the favor of the plaintiff or defendant.

Investigation Report – An investigation is done in the event of a major accident involving serious injury death to one or more people involved in the accident. This thorough and detailed report is perhaps one of the most telling and may be accompanied by testimony by the investigating officer.

Eye Witness Account – Eye witness account can be sketchy at times as many people only see the outcome of the accident seconds after hearing the crash and seldom see the accident unfold in front of them.

Footage – It is not uncommon to have footage of an accident either through the city’s intersection video monitoring section or through the security cameras of surrounding businesses.

DUI (Driving Under the Influence) – If the other driver was found to be above the legal limit for alcohol of .08 on a breathalyzer or blood test then they are automatically deemed negligent. It is only through a very well thought out defense that they are not considered at least partially if not fully at fault for the accident (see definition of “Fault” below).

Medical Examination – In the event of an accident caused by a medical emergency such as a heart attack or stroke, a through medical examination is conducted on the defendant. The plaintiff has the ability to subpoena the medical records of the defendant in order to determine if they had prior knowledge of a medical condition and the risks involved.

Other Tests – Tests for drugs both legal and illegal can subject the defendant to DUI laws and render them liable for the accident.

Washington State RCW 4.22.70 – “Percentage of Fault” The sum of the percentages of the total fault attributed to at-fault entities shall equal one hundred percent. The entities whose fault shall be determined include the claimant or person suffering personal injury or incurring property damage, defendants, third-party defendants, entities released by the claimant, entities with any other individual defense against the claimant, and entities immune from liability to the claimant, but shall not include those entities immune from liability to the claimant.

Seattle Personal Injury Lawyer

As stated above, when proving negligence, there are many different other factors that come into play that are basically only interpretable by a legal professional with extensive skill and experience in personal injury law. That is why it is best to find a most qualified legal professional you can.

Phillips Webster is a full service law firm with a substantial track record of success Personal Injury Litigation. We take the time to fully assess the injured party’s case in order to assure that the victim receives the compensation they deserve. Call our Personal Injury Attorneys today for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

What Are The Elements For Determining Fault in A Personal Injury Lawsuit?

driver negligence, negligence, personal injury, personal injury attorney, personal injury lawyers, washington personal injury attorney, washington personal injury lawyer

February 7th, 2011: Law Blogger

Personal Injury LawyerYou’ve gotten injured in a car accident and now you’ve begun the painful healing process. You see the medical bills racking up as your savings dwindle because you can’t yet work. The whole ordeal is a frightening scenario that thousands of Americans go through every year. Some victims get relief and compensation through litigation. Most don’t even know that they have that option due to either perception of fault or they’ve been told that they can’t.

But what if, like in so many car accidents, the lines of fault and liability are fuzzy?

Seeking compensation can be a hard thing with many complicated elements. The most important part in seeking compensation is finding fault. The elements in determining fault in a personal injury lawsuit range widely, but here are a few that you as a victim can consider.

Fault for Accidents in Washington State

Below are the elements around the country of different ways that states determine fault. These are ways for states to clearly define methods in which victims of personal injury can seek compensation. Some are certainly more extreme than others. Washington has perhaps one of the most liberal definitions, but it is a common one that is actually preferred by some of the most conservative states in the nation.

Washington State RCW 4.22.015 “Fault” defined -Fault includes acts or omissions, including misuse of a product, that are in any measure negligent or reckless toward the person or property of the actor or others, or that subject a person to strict tort liability or liability on a product liability claim. The term also includes breach of warranty, unreasonable assumption of risk, and unreasonable failure to avoid an injury or to mitigate damages. Legal requirements of causal relation apply both to fault as the basis for liability and to contributory fault.”

Certainly this covers a wide array of “faults” including product liability, personal negligence, and reckless behavior. When applied to a vehicle there are many accompanying laws that define negligence and reckless driving. The above definition is a start to understanding fault in Washington State.

Notice some of the wording such as the what is stated in the first sentence of the above definition, the “misuse of a product” through negligence leading to tort liability, otherwise known as a lawsuit. Also the term “causal relation” to “contributory fault” are significant in determining overall liability. But as you’ll see, in Washington State they come in the form of percentages.

Elements in Determining Fault in A Personal Injury Lawsuit

Contributory Negligence – Contributory negligence is one, what some consider, a somewhat extreme way of determining fault. The way it works is that if two people were involved in an accident and the injured party was even the slightest bit at fault, he or she would not be entitled to recover anything for his/her injuries or losses. Washington state has not one of the states that uses this method.

Comparative Negligence – Washington State uses a proportional form of “comparative negligence” that allows an injured party to recover some damages for his or her injuries, even if he or she was partially at fault. There are currently three variations:

  • Pure comparative fault
  • Proportional comparative fault at 51%
  • Proportional comparative fault at 50%

Pure Comparative Fault – This is the type of system we use in Washington. How it works is that if an injured person is partially at fault for causing his own injuries, his damages are reduced by the percentage of his fault. This means that there needs to be reasonable proof of proportionality in court.

Proportional Comparative Fault at 51% – This is similar to proportional comparative fault recovery, but if the plaintiff is determined to be more than 51% at fault for the accident. The difference is that the plaintiff cannot file a liability claim and lawsuit against the other driver’s negligence if you were more than 51% at fault.

Proportional Comparative Fault at 50% – This element dictates that the injured person must be less than 50% at fault for the accident is entitled to compensation. If the injured party is 50% or more at fault, he or she is not entitled to recovery for the injury.

How is Percentage of Fault Determined?

Personal Injury AttorneyThis is particularly important in Washington State since it is a matter of percentage of fault that determines the size of the compensation. After a car accident resulting in personal injuries, the insurance company claims adjuster assigns the relative degrees of fault based on the circumstances surrounding the accident based on the crash report and internal investigation. Determining percentages of fault in accident injuries is also merely a matter of negotiation between the claims adjusters and the parties involved. They come to some agreement as to where to allocate fault and to what proportion.

Washington State RCW 4.22.70 – “Percentage of Fault”The sum of the percentages of the total fault attributed to at-fault entities shall equal one hundred percent. The entities whose fault shall be determined include the claimant or person suffering personal injury or incurring property damage, defendants, third-party defendants, entities released by the claimant, entities with any other individual defense against the claimant, and entities immune from liability to the claimant, but shall not include those entities immune from liability to the claimant.

During the negotiation process is a very important to have a legal representative on your side fighting for your interests. You attorney will know how to assess the accident and advocate for the lowest percentage of fault on your behalf. If you and the insurance adjuster reach an impasse, a court of law is ultimately your next step to resolve the issue of fault and since these percentages are largely the determining factor in the amount of compensation, it is best to have a representative in the beginning.

Seattle Car Accident Attorneys

After a car accident, things are often confusing and memories of what happened start to dissipate or distort. This can cause serious problems, particularly if one party is misrepresenting facts in an instance where there may not be a ton of reliable witnesses or a camera in the intersection that captured the accident. These are particularly cases where you need to find experienced legal council right away before you speak to anyone else.

And whatever you do, DO NOT sign anything without showing it to your attorney first.

Phillips Webster is a full service law firm with a substantial track record of success Personal Injury Litigation. We take the time to fully assess the injured party’s case in order to assure that the victim receives the compensation they deserve. Call our Personal Injury Attorneys today for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Study Reinforces Dangers of Texting While Driving

Add new tag, auto accident lawyers, collisions, hands free law, negligence, text messages, texting while driving

July 28th, 2009: Washington Law Blogger

We’ve posted recently about the Washington hands-free law that requires drivers to use devices with their cell phones and PDA’s that keep both hands free while driving, and today comes word of a new study that deals directly with the growing problem of sending text messages while operating a vehicle. It should come as no surprise that the study concluded that the practice is dangerous, but it was surprising to find out just how dangerous texting while driving can be.

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer published the findings of the study, and they include:

“The Virginia Tech Transportation Institute used cameras to continuously observe light vehicle drivers and truckers for more than 6 million miles. It found that when drivers of heavy trucks texted, their collision risk was 23 times greater than when not texting.

Dialing a cell phone and using or reaching for an electronic device increased risk of collision about 6 times in cars and trucks.

Recent research using driving simulators suggested that talking and listening were as dangerous as texting, but the “naturalistic driving studies clearly indicate that this is not the case,” a news release from the institute said. The risks of texting generally applied to all drivers, not just truckers, the researchers said. Complete results were expected to be released Tuesday.

Right before a crash or near collision, drivers spent nearly five seconds looking at their devices, which was enough time at 55 mph to cover more than the length of a football field.”

The clear conclusion as to why texting is more dangerous than speaking on the phone is because the driver’s eyes are drawn away from the road while punching text keys. Regardless, texting while driving is illegal in Washington, and if you or someone you love has been injured as a result of this sort of negligence, you need to contact the auto accident lawyers at Phillips & Webster today to schedule a free initial consultation.

Washington Supreme Court Restores $14M DUI Accident Verdict

damages, DUI, DUI accident, DUI accident attorneys, injuries, liability, negligence

July 17th, 2009: Washington Law Blogger

When someone gets behind the wheel after drinking and causes injuries or worse, the parties who could be liable extend beyond the driver who caused the crash. While many states have a law in existence that’s known as the Dram Shop Act, Washington’s liability standards are not as clear. This is partially what led to the overturning of a trial court award by the Appellate Court for a disabled child. Yesterday, the award was restored by the Supreme Court.

According to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer:

“The Supreme Court in Washington state on Thursday unanimously reinstated a $14 million award to a family who sued a tavern and a bartender after one of the bar’s customers drove away from the establishment and collided with their car, leaving a 7-year-old-boy a paraplegic.

Under state law, bartenders who serve visibly intoxicated customers are liable for damages to potential victims. At question was the type of evidence needed to prove “negligent overservice.”

Washington state’s justices noted that a forensic consultant found that the bar patron – Hawkeye Kinkaid – likely drank the equivalent of either 21 12-ounce beers or 30 ounces of 80-proof alcohol, and probably had a blood alcohol content of 0.32 at the time of the collision. The legal threshold in Washington state is 0.08.”

While this situation remains a senseless tragedy for many involved, including the driver who was killed in the accident, the boy who faces a lifetime of struggle will now be able to rest assured that his care will be paid for adequately. If you or someone you love has been harmed in a DUI accident, contact the attorneys at Phillips & Webster today to schedule a free initial consultation.

Another Little-Known Danger with Truck Accidents – Flying Weapons

cargo, fault, injuries, negligence, trucking accident, trucking accident attorneys

July 13th, 2009: Washington Law Blogger

When truck accidents occur, the results are usually not only predictable, but irreversibly devastating in an emotional sense for those who are injured and their families. Trucks are enormous vehicles that can weigh as much as 60,000 pounds, and when they collide with much smaller vehicles, people are seriously injured or worse more often than not. However, there are other dangers associated with truck accidents – flying cargo.

According to an article published by the Chicago Tribune:

“A freak accident launched a huge knife at a car barreling down the highway. It happened July 1st on SR 520 near Bellevue Way.

Washington State Troopers say a truck traveling westbound lost its load and set off a chain reaction accident as cars and trucks tried to avoid the debris.

Mike Horton was riding his motorcycle when the accident happened.

Horton says; “Cars were going every which way. The truck that dropped the load was at a dead stop. A truck came into my lane sideways. I had no place to go.”

His body is scraped and bruised and his motorcycle is heavily damaged after he had to lay it down to save his own life.

With no one seriously injured Horton felt lucky, even more so when he saw the knife sticking out of the car bumper.

The bad thing about this accident according to the State Patrol; there was a cargo net in the back of the truck when the load fell off the driver, they say just didn’t bother to use it.”

Flying cargo can kill and seriously injure, and when trucks do not take basic measures to protect themselves and other drivers from their cargo, liability exposure can arise. If you or someone you love has been harmed in a trucking accident, contact the attorneys at Phillips & Webster today to schedule a free initial consultation.

Local Man Injured When Sidewalk Collapses

attorneys, back injuries, negligence, rescue, sidewalk collapse, trauma

May 21st, 2009: Washington Law Blogger

We have all become accustomed to trusting public infrastructure to the point where most of us take it for granted – roads will remain paved and passable, bridges will remain upright and sidewalks will hold steady as millions of people walk across them every year. However, one local man will likely never feel completely safe walking down the street again after the sidewalk beneath him collapsed, leaving him trapped.

According to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer:

“The 60-year-old man fell after a section of concrete slab gave way near a park gate about eight feet from the pedestrian sidewalk at the intersection of Alaskan Way and South Washington Street, said Dana Vander Houwen, a Seattle Fire Department spokeswoman. He was rescued just more than an hour after becoming trapped at 7:45 a.m.

Tidal water seeping through a metal seawall appeared to have eroded fill that, until now, had been supporting the concrete section, said Ron Paananen, deputy coordinator for urban corridors with the state Department of Transportation. Crews were preparing to begin an examination of the area to determine the extent of damage to the walkway and the adjacent Pier 48 park.”

It appears that the man will recover, as he was taken to the hospital with back pain even though officials described his injuries as not being severe. Back injuries can take time to fully develop, though, and the trauma associated with falling into a crevice beneath one’s feet can be severe.

If you or someone you love has been injured as a result of faulty construction work, you may have legal rights. Contact the Seattle personal injury lawyers at Phillips & Webster today to schedule a free initial consultation.

Lawsuit for Wrongful Death of Seattle Bicyclist Settles

attorney, bicycle accident, negligence, personal injury, seattle, settlement, Wrongful Death

April 29th, 2009: Washington Law Blogger

Two years ago, Bryce Lewis was riding his bike through Seattle with a friend when a dump truck suddenly made a right turn into them. Lewis was dragged under the truck and carried a short distance down the next road. Tragically, Lewis did not survive the accident, and the incident prompted a wave of protests by the bicycle-riding community. Additionally, Lewis’ family filed suit against the company for which the truck driver worked.

According to a report filed by the Seattle Times, the lawsuit has settled:

“Lewis was riding with friend Caleb Hall in a bike lane on Eastlake Avenue East near the University Bridge in September 2007 when a Nelson & Sons dump truck driven by David McClane made a sudden right turn into the young men at Fuhrman Avenue East

Hall banged on the side of the truck and yelled for McClane to stop, but Lewis was pulled under the truck and was killed. McClane, apparently unaware that he had hit the men, kept driving a short distance down Fuhrman before stopping.

Hall, who had recently moved to Seattle with Lewis from Colorado to attend college, was not seriously hurt.

A couple of months after the accident, scores of bicyclists mounted a wheeled demonstration through the streets of Seattle to remember Lewis and to call on the city to do more about bike safety, particularly in the Eastlake neighborhood.”

The amount of the settlement was not disclosed, which is customary in these sorts of situations. If you or someone you love has been injured or worse in a bicycle accident, contact the personal injury attorneys at the Seattle law firm of Phillips & Webster today to schedule a free initial consultation.