FOLLOW US: Twitter facebook
Washington & Nationwide (Toll Free 24/7)
(800) 708-6000
California
(213) 808-6740

Free Case Review

  • * First Name:
  • * Last Name:
  • * Email:
  • * Phone Number:
  • Comment:
  • Accept Terms *
    *Denotes Required Field

News Updates via Email

If you would like to receive our news updates right to your inbox, provide us with your email address. We won't use your email for anything besides sending you news updates from our blog.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Dangerous Drug Information

If you or a loved one has been injured by the side effects of a defective drug, our defective drug attorneys can help you and your family. We are currently investigating the following dangerous drugs:

Drug Side Effects and Injuries

Law Blog Categories

Car Accidents
3 Reasons to Hire Phillips Webster

Our attorneys have decades of experience negotiating with insurance companies regarding all types of vehicle accidents. If you have been injured in a wreck, contact us today.

  1. We represent EVERYONE in need anywhere in Washington - Minor and Major Injuries
  2. Experienced trial attorneys that will fight for your right to recover compensation
  3. FREE Case Review and we only get paid if you get paid
Learn more about our:
Seattle Car Accident Lawyers

Verdicts & Settlements

$20 MILLION - Commercial Injury
Confidential settlement for a commercial injury case

$19  Million - Grant of Coverage
Grant of coverage in insurance coverage case

$2 MILLION - INSURANCE BAD FAITH
Settlement in insurance bad faith case

$1.5 MILLION - CAR ACCIDENT WRONGFUL DEATH
Vancouver, Washington car accident that resulted in a death

$1 MILLION - DUI ACCIDENT VICTIM
Settlement for young man hit by a drunk driver

Our jury trial experience shows in the results we get both inside and outside of the courtroom.

More Verdicts and Settlements

Posts Tagged ‘personal injury’

Why Does Washington State Top The On-The-Job Injury List?

on-the-job injury, personal injury, Worker's Compensation, Worker's Compensation Lawyers, Workers Comp, Workers Compensation Attorneys, Wrongful Death

February 2nd, 2012: Law Blogger

Washington State is one of the four states in the U.S. that has a state run workers compensation program, Washington State Labor and Industries (L&I). It has come under pressure in the last few years as private insurers and giant companies in the state pump money into efforts to privatize the system. Now, some disturbing statistics have come out that may help their effort.

According to an investigation conducted by KEPR TV in Tri-Cities, Washington State had the most work-related injuries last year out of any state in the country. Their investigation revealed that 52 people died in a work related incident last year, nearly twice the national average.

This statistic also includes thousands of workers who were personally injured in various accidents from everything ranging from falls to chemical burns. The investigators confirm that many of the accidents occurred in Eastern Washington at jobs involving manual labor.

But, why are these happening and what are state regulators doing about it?

Why Is This Happening?

This is where it gets a little complicated. The reason why there is so much pressure on the L&I over privatization is over the fact that rates for workers compensation has been steadily rising for employers since 2007 as state revenue has begun to dwindle and a mounting number of employers default on their premiums.

In fact, 2012 is the first year that the agency has confirmed that there will be no increases in what employers pay for workers compensation. This suggests that they have finally covered shortfalls in the funding, however, those who work closely with injured workers and workplace safety advocates suggest that this has perhaps come at the cost of employee safety.

Cuts in the number of inspectors has been deep and some suggest that this has caused workplace safety standards to falter. You see, the national standards set by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) are generally enforced by OSHA inspectors. Washington is an exception to this, as L&I sends out their own inspectors to sites such as the Tesoro plant explosion that claimed 7 workers.

These kinds of incidents are well publicized and garner a huge reaction, but thousands of injuries at construction sites and farms around the state remain barely investigated. In some cases, when the injury involves an immigrant, they will go unreported.

What Is Being Done?

Unfortunately, the problem with low resources means that much of what is done is reactionary instead of proactive, so many of the new rules implemented by L&I come after the fact. Some of the new rules this year involve:

  • Rules regulating the safety of cranes.
  • Rules surrounding handling of hazardous material.
  • Rules regarding training in hospitals and pharmacies specifically if working with chemotherapy drugs.

Aside from hiring new inspectors, L&I has decided to focus its resources on enforcing dead-beat employers and the care workers receive in order to get worker back to work faster. Thus, this pumps more money into the organization and costs them less in output rather than addressing the problem at the source. However, these policies have resulted in a promising project known as L&I’s Centers of Occupational Health and Education (COHE). COHEs are community-based organizations that work with medical providers to encourage the best ways to treat injured workers.

This whole program sprouted out of research published in the December 2011 issue of the American Public Health Association journal. Dr. Gary Franklin, medical director for the L&I), was one of the researchers involved in the study; Dr Thomas Wickizer, Ohio State University, College of Public Health, was the lead investigator.

L&I teamed up with physicians in Washington and throughout the country, health care researchers at the University of Washington, as well as business and labor leaders to find the “best practices” of helping workers in the first 12 weeks after a work-related injury.

These “best practices” focus on the safe, healthy return of injured workers to full function and full employment. Examples of best practices include:

  • Promptly filing the workers’ compensation claim.
  • Phoning the employer to talk about the worker’s ability to return to work or a light-duty job.
  • Regularly assessing a worker’s ability to do work activities.

The study found that when injured workers are treated using COHE best practices, they had 19.7% fewer disability days than other injured workers receiving treatment, and a reduction in total disability and medical costs of $510 per claim. Workers suffering from back strain had a reduction in disability days of 29.5%.

“We’re especially encouraged that the outcomes for workers with low-back strain were significantly better,” said Dr. Franklin. “Lower-back strain is a costly and common disabling condition in workers’ compensation.”

Currently, four COHE sites serve 2,000 providers and hundreds of employers, treating about one-third of injured workers in Washington. The findings of the study led to new legislation 2011 that will expand access to COHEs to all injured workers in the state by 2015.

Washington Workers Compensation Lawyers

It is clear that the efforts of L&I is successfully bringing in money and turning around some forecasting oversights. However, the new statistics are disheartening. Workplace safety is our priority, but that doesn’t specifically mean that privatization is the answer. L&I has proven to be a very effective and sustainable organization with a good safety enforcement track record in the past. It is only with renewed dedication by legislators that Washington State can have a fully functional public worker’s compensation system.

The law firm of Phillips Webster has a team of legal professionals dedicated to seeking just compensation for workers injured on the job. Our workers compensation attorneys will look at your case for free and give you options on what you need to do to move forward. Call Phillips Webster now for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Why Are Low Income People Charged More For Car Insurance?

auto accident, auto accident attorneys, auto accident lawyer, Car accidents, car insurance, insurance, personal injury, Seattle auto accident attorneys, Seattle Car Accident Lawyers

January 31st, 2012: Law Blogger

Laws in Washington State and around the country were passed long ago requiring all drivers carry car insurance to that they can cover any damage or personal injury costs resulting in an accident. I don’t think there’s any doubt in anyone’s mind that this is a good thing, as long as it’s equitable.

As Washington personal injury attorneys with a diverse clientele spanning across all income brackets, we are right in the middle of the insurance issue. That’s why we were a little steamed about a study that came out this week regarding the disparity in charges for car insurance to lower income drivers than higher income drivers.

Lower Income Insurance Study

A new and quite extensive report from the Consumer Federation of America (CFA), an organization that seeks to advance consumer interests through advocacy, research, and education, has shown some major rate disparities by income amongst some of the largest car insurance companies in America.

In the report the authors pointed out that for many poor people, the cost of car insurance can impede car ownership and in cases of lower cost cars, can exceed the cost of the vehicle itself. That has broad economic implications since those without cars have a harder time getting to work, school, day care or the grocery store.

“There is much academic research that clearly shows that if you have ready access to a car, it dramatically improves your economic opportunities,” said Stephen Brobeck, executive director at CFA.

Researchers cited 2006 research that found that those with less education and working in less skilled occupations often pay premiums that were on average 40% higher. Certainly this has many different factors involved in it, but the wider view into the disparity suggests that there may be a larger inequality issue here.

Even though insurers are prohibited from asking for a potential customers income, the authors of the study contend that many of their methods put lower- and moderate-income households with between $20,000 to $40,000 in earnings per year at a disadvantage. The reason for this is that insurers, though not asking directly, have other roundabout questions that are perfectly legal with give them a fairly accurate gauge as to the income of the person they are interviewing.

One of the main reasons for this is that the cheaper the car insurance is on paper, the more the people are paying for the actual coverage. Researchers liken it to going to a store with large items that only wealthy people have access to and getting the item for the same price as a smaller item at another store that poor people frequent. The pricing versus coverage is often wildly disproportionate.

After examining the data and researcher’s coments, the CFA suggests that pricing should be largely influenced by factors that drivers can control, like the cars they drive and how far and safely they drive them.

“Poor people, we know from the data, they spend a lot less on gas, which means they are driving less,” said J. Robert Hunter, co-author of the paper and director of insurance at the group. “So if insurers more fully reflected miles driven in pricing, it would lower the rate for poorer people.”

Determining Rates

Differences in rates are nothing new. If you are a young male who drives a fast car, you know that well. Why? Because males between the ages of 16 and 25 are statistically the most prone to car accidents and most of the accidents are caused by speeding. The numbers ring true regardless of income. These rates come down at a certain point after the driver has proven they are responsible and hit a certain age.

What determines car insurance rates and do they effect the poor disproportionately?

  • Age – Generally, the older you are, the fewer accidents you’ll have than less experienced drivers, particularly teenagers. Insurers charge more if teenagers or young people below age 25 drive your car. No effect.
  • Credit – Insurance companies use FICO scores as a factor in insurance rates. Credit-based insurance scores are based on information like payment history, bankruptcies, collections, outstanding debt and length of credit history. Regular, on-time credit card and mortgage payments affect a score positively, while late payments affect a score negatively. Yes. Poor people generally have lower credit ratings overall.
  • Location – Local statistics influence Insurance rates, such as the number of accidents, car thefts and lawsuits, as well as the cost of medical care and car repair. Yes. Income is a large determining factor as to the crime rate of they area in which they live.
  • Make and Model – Automobiles that are expensive, have high theft rates, higher repair cost or have poor safety records cost more to insure. No effect.
  • Odometer Reading – If you drive a lot you increase your chance for accidents, the more you’ll pay. If you drive less than 10,000 miles a year, you will pay less. Some companies will give discounts to policyholders who carpool. Yes. As inner cities with more access to public transit become more gentrified, it forces the poor to move farther out, forcing them to put more miles on their odometer to reach their jobs.
  • Time Without Insurance – Plus there’s a time lag. You may also pay more if you haven’t been insured for a number of years. Yes. Poor people do not pay for items that they don’t use. If they live near their work, then they may have long periods where they do not drive.
  • Safe Driving Record – If you have a lot of accidents and serious traffic violations, the higher your rate of course. No effect.
  • Size of Policy – You’ll pay more for a large policy. Generally, insurance companies offer discounts if you have your homeowners and auto insurance policies with them. Yes. Many lower income people do not own their homes, boats, etc and do not have access to bundling discounts.

Seattle Car Accident Lawyer

There is a much larger poor population than there is rich, so it would be unreasonable to say that poor people get into more accidents based purely on population. There is also little to no evidence that, just because a person is poor, they are more prone to accidents.

We’re concerned about this issue because insurance companies will use any excuse to gouge the public and when one of their loyal customers receives a personal injury in a car wreck, they do everything in their power to avoid paying what they agreed to pay in order for the individual to receive proper care and/or just compensation.

If you or someone you know has been injured in a car accident anywhere in Washington state, you need a skilled lawyer to deal with the insurance companies to assure you the best settlement. Call the Seattle car accident attorneys at Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

What Effect Does A Brain Injury In A Car Accident Have On My Child?

brain injuries, Brain Injury Lawyers, concussion, Head Injury, head trauma, personal injury, tbi, washington personal injury lawyer

January 26th, 2012: Law Blogger

One of the hardest things about being a personal injury attorney is seeing the grief of parents as their child suffers through a traumatic brain injury (TBI) that they sustained in a car accident due to a negligent, reckless, or drunk driver.

Though there is some satisfaction in finding justice and compensation to help with medical bills, any family dealing with a child suffering from TBI will tell you, that’s far from where the struggle ends. We have written articles about childhood head injuries, how they can effect emotional development, and how they may even lead to violent tendencies later in life.

Now there have been some more comprehensive studies that show childhood TBI victims may suffer even more dire consequences to their ability to learn that may effect how well they achieve throughout their lifetime.

Children and Brain Injuries

Children often suffer mild brain injuries many times throughout their lives resulting from a fall. About 1 in 30 newborns will have a traumatic brain injury by age 16, some researchers have found. Researchers also know that the impairments after these injuries persist until at least five years after the accident. However, experts confirm motor vehicle accidents are a leading cause of severe brain injury in kids.

Now, two Australian research studies have been released recently that examined the impact of traumatic brain injury in children as young as 2 years, and found that these injuries affected cognitive function, IQ and even behavior for some time.

One, conducted by the University of Melbourne lead by Dr. Vicki Anderson, evaluated 40 children who had a traumatic brain injury. The accidents happened when they ranged in age from 2 to 7. They divided them into three groups by severity of their injuries.

The categories were:

  • Seven had mild injuries.
  • Twenty had moderate injuries.
  • Thirteen had severe injuries.

Through the course of the 10 year study, researchers compared the children with brain injuries to healthy children. The children were tested on several measures, including their IQ, cognitive skills, and social and behavioral skills. They were also tested on their adaptive ability such as their response to daily demands and any learning difficulties.

Researchers found that recovery from traumatic brain injury can continue for years after the initial injury. The kids with the most severe brain injuries had the most significant results, showing lower IQs of between 18 and 26 points. Children who had moderate-to-severe TBIs scored lower on IQ tests by about seven to 10 points. Mild traumatic brain injuries didn’t seem to significantly affect IQ.

A child’s home environment can positively influence recovery if the child lives in a stable, caring home.

“A quality home environment and access to appropriate rehabilitation is critical to maximize outcomes,” Anderson said.

Long Term Effects Of Minor Accidents

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), TBIs occur after a blow or bump to the head. The CDC says that young children under 4 years old are particularly at risk of experiencing a TBI, which can occur from a fall, a car accident, deliberate child abuse, sports or being hit with a moving object. The agency says that about one-third of children who survive a TBI will have lasting damage.

The second study was led by Louise Crowe, a postdoctoral research officer at the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute in Melbourne. His team followed a group of 53 children who had sustained a TBI before they were 3 years old as well as 27 non-injured children. They followed up with these children when they were between 4 and 6 years old. The average time since the injury occurred was 40 months.

This study found that children who had moderate-to-severe TBIs scored lower on IQ tests by about seven to 10 points. However, though the test subjects with mild and moderate-to-severe TBIs showed no significant decrease in IQ, they were associated with an increased risk of behavior problems.

“Many people think that the soft skull of a baby may give them some advantage because if they fall they are not likely to sustain a skull fracture. Also, because a baby’s brain is growing so quickly, it seems like the brain may be able to fix an injury,” Crowe said. “In reality, the soft skull and growing brain of a baby put them at a greater risk of future problems.”

Researchers in this study also stressed the importance of a strong, stress-free environment with ample support from the parents to increase the chances of a strong, lasting, and balanced recovery.

“Children from cohesive family environments and children whose parents had lower levels of stress showed better recovery,” Crowe said. “Why this is so is unclear, but it may be due to a parent spending more time with their children, and children also growing up in a less stressful environment.

Washington Brain Injury Lawyer

As you can see, the main cause of TBI in kids is car accidents and depending on the severity of the injury, this can be a life altering injury affecting their future potential, employment, and quality of life. It can also lead to antisocial and potentially violent behavior. This is bad for both the child and parents.

Also, researchers confirm that long-term care and a solid, stress-free environment at home with ample support and time spent on recovery is key to returning the child on a positive road for the rest of their lives. This requires compensation far beyond what insurance companies feel as if they are required to pay because it may mean that one or both parents need to quit their jobs to care for the child full time as well as physical therapy, mental therapy, and moving out of the city or other high stress environments.

If you or someone you know has suffered from a traumatic brain injury then some of the best advice they can get is to find experienced legal council that can properly negotiate with insurance companies and medical care providers to assure that you get the compensation you deserve. Call the brain injury attorneys at Phillips Webster for a free consultation on your legal options.

Learn More About:

How Dangerous Is It For My Teenager To Drive With Passengers?

GDL Laws, personal injury, teen drivers, teenage drivers, Washington car accident attorneys, Washington car accident lawyer, Wrongful Death

January 25th, 2012: Law Blogger

Teen car accidents in Washington State are not only a giant concern for parents, but also legislators. Washington State is one of the more active members of the Governor’s Highway Safety Association (GHSA), which brought Graduated Driver Laws (GDL). These laws set guidelines as to how teenagers can drive at night, with passengers, and at what ages they can do these things.

Though the details vary by state, they stay under the same general principles of young driver safety and graduated system of licensure over a period of time.

  • Learner Stage: supervised driving, cumulating with a driving test
  • Intermediate Stage: limiting unsupervised driving in high risk situations
  • Full Privilege Stage: a standard driver’s license

These laws have come under attack as some studies have shown that they do not address maturity, which can vary from person to person and can be the difference in some of the most dangerous situations, namely, driving with passenger distractions.

Passenger Distractions

Teenagers can be an excitable lot, particularly when they’re in the car experiencing a freedom they had been previously deprived. As you’ll see, there are lots of reasons for these distractions and they can vary by gender, but what is not under dispute is that passenger distraction is considered by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) as one of the biggest causes of teen car accidents.

Since car accidents are the leading cause of death for people 16 to 25, this has made passenger distractions a huge concern for traffic safety officials and advocates. This week has also perhaps marked a turning point as two studies came out showing some of the causal factors involved in passenger distraction.

The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and State Farm both published their studies in the Journal of Adolescent Health. They don’t specifically show the danger of distraction, that was already know, instead they help us understand the factors that may predispose teens to drive with multiple friends and how those passengers may contribute to crashes by distracting the driver and promoting risky driving behaviors, such as speeding, tailgating, or weaving.

“Knowing this, we can develop programs that work in tandem with current Graduated Driver Licensing laws,” said study author Allison Curry, PhD, director of epidemiology at the Center for Injury Research and Prevention.

The first study surveyed 198 teen drivers. For the most part teens in this study generally reported strong perceptions of the risks of driving, low frequencies of driving with multiple passengers, and strong beliefs that their parents monitored their behavior and set rules.

However, the teens who are most likely to drive with multiple passengers shared the following characteristics:

  • Considered themselves “thrill-seekers.”
  • Perceived their parents as not setting rules or monitoring their whereabouts.
  • Possessed a weak perception of the risks associated with driving in general.

Teen Passenger Distraction Risk By Gender

The State Farm study analyzed 677 teen drivers involved in serious crashes and compared the likelihood of driver distraction and risk-taking behaviors just prior to the crash when teens drive with peer passengers as opposed to when they drive alone.

Researchers found that both male and female teen drivers with peer passengers were more likely to be distracted just before a crash as compared to teens who crashed while driving alone. However, 71% of males as compared to 47% of females said they were distracted directly by the actions of their passengers.

The study found males with passengers were nearly 6x more likely to perform an illegal maneuver and 2x more likely to drive aggressively just before a crash, as compared to males driving alone. Females rarely drove aggressively prior to a crash, regardless of whether they had passengers in the car.

“Teen passengers can intentionally and unintentionally encourage unsafe driving,” said Dr. Mirman. “It’s best to keep the number of passengers to a minimum for the first year.”

The study authors also emphasized the important role parents play in supporting safe driving among teens and their passengers.

“Combined with Graduated Driver Licensing laws that limit passengers for the first year of driving, involved parents are an effective strategy to protect teens from a dangerous and preventable crash risk – driving with their friends,” said Chris Mullen, research director at State Farm

They recommend parents set a house rule of no non-sibling teen passengers for the first six months of driving and only one non-sibling passenger for the second six months.

When combined with a study conducted by the University of California, which (amongst a ton of other valuable information) revealed the causal behaviors cited in teen passenger distraction car accidents by gender as you can see in the chart below.

Washington Car Accident Lawyers

The attorneys at Phillips Webster support any effort that keeps teenage drivers and their families safe. We have seen how the terrible grief over the loss of a loved one torn away at the beginning of their lives due to a car accident can rip apart families and send shockwaves through a community.
Phillips Webster represents families of victims who have been injured or died in car accidents in Washington state. We are skilled attorneys in wrongful death lawsuits and personal injury lawsuits with years of experience that they will use to assure that you get the compensation you deserve. Call today for a free consultation.
Learn More About:

Is Driving With A Cold As Bad As Drunk Driving?

Car Accident, Car accidents, DUI, DUI accident, personal injury, Seattle car accident attorney, Seattle Car Accident Lawyers, Washington car accident attorney

January 17th, 2012: Law Blogger

It is cold season and with all of these people walking around the streets or sitting at their desks sneezing and coughing and downing shots of Dayquil like it’s Jagermeister at a frat party, it’s no wonder that they may have some trouble getting home and sometimes get into auto accidents.

And if a person is sick and single, or at least left to fend for themselves at home while their spouse or significant other is at work, it seems that driving is required to get to the store in order to get some (any) relief…and ice cream. Walking long distances when you barely have the energy to lift your head seems overwhelming, but getting to the car is just as hard.

However, now science has stepped forward and proven that driving with a heavy cold can affect ability to the same extent as drinking more than four double whiskies. Wow, now that IS a frat party!

Driving With A Cold

Could the most dangerous people on the road potentially be totally sober, if not for the bacteria that’s trying it’s hardest to consume them? Safety experts suggest the answer could be “yes.”

British Insurance company Young Marmalade, which carried out the research jointly with UK car and bike accessory manufactuerer, Halfords, say that they have found a dramatic increase in poor driving when cold sufferers were subjected to scientific tests.

Researchers say that driver’s reaction times dropped sharply when they had severe cold symptoms, sudden braking became much more frequent and cornering became erratic as the test subjects were found to be less aware of what was around them.

The research team used what is called a “telematic” box, which records drivers’ speed, braking, and cornering, just like the little black box one might find on an airplane. After a thorough examination of the data, researchers found that a participant who had an “excellent” driving rating of 95% when healthy dropped to 60% when suffering from a cold.

Based on a common UK rating system, a person at 60% should expect to be involved in an accident and may be deemed uninsurable by normal insurance companies. It inspired Young Marmalade to issue a warning for motorists not to drive with heavy colds or flu.

“We would advise a commonsense approach. A heavy cold can impair a driver’s mood, concentration and judgment, if you don’t feel well don’t drive,” they said.

Cardiff University Common Cold Unit in South Wales has also come out with similar conclusions from research they conducted in 2011 involving cold and flu sufferers. They found that their subjects had poor reaction times and alertness, putting them at risk of being involved in an serious car accident.

Symptoms of Bad Driving

Though it is almost impossible to truly gauge statistically, insurance companies suspect sick drivers are responsible for thousands of accidents every year. Police warn that drivers getting behind the wheel while suffering a heavy cold could potentially be putting other drivers at risk and could be found to be driving under the influence (DUI) if they’ve been found to have consumed too much over the counter medicines with alcohol in them. However, they also warn that flus and colds can lead to dangerous, even reckless, behavior.

“Sneezing can be very violent, especially with a severe cold and causes the sufferer to close their eyes temporarily,” said Pc Steve Rounds, of the Central Motorway Police Group.

Symptoms that should make you reconsider driving:

Fever (100º F or greater) – Fevers can cause lightheadedness and confusion and have even been known to cause hallucinations if they are greater than 104º. Every flu is accompanied a temperature, but if it exceeds 100º do not operate a vehicle.

Headache – A mild headache and operating a vehicle can be fine, but a flu headache resembles that of a migraine. Light and sound are abrasive and painful causing the sufferer to close their eyes and beg for quiet and darkness. Flu headaches can cause blurred vision, excessive blinking, confusion, and severe shooting pain. You should not drive with those symptoms.

Muscle aches – These are irritating, but driving with them is not a potential cause of a car accident unless pain medication is taken (see below).

Chills – This is a sign of a fever and should prompt the sufferer to stay in bed.

Extreme tiredness – This is a very bad symptom to be driving on. Drowsy driving causes thousands of car accidents and thousands of deaths and injuries every year as tired drivers drift into oncoming lanes and off of roads.

Coughing or Sneezing – A hacking cough or excessive sneezing can cause the driver to take their hand temporarily off of the wheel and may cause them to close their eyes. This can be a problem when accidents can happen in a split second.

Runny nose – This symptom is just irritating and gross, but doesn’t really contribute to accidents. But driving with one hand while the other is occupied with a tissue only adds to the over dangerousness of driving with a cold.

Seattle Car Accident Attorney

Washington law is very specific about its reckless driving laws, including such things as tailgating, speeding, and driving erratically. Though it may be found that sick drivers are not under the influence of cough syrup or other cold and flu drugs, if they get into a car accident they could potentially be found negligent reckless driving by driving erratically.

If you or someone you know has been injured in a car accident in the state of Washington, you need an experienced representative to assure you receive the best settlement. Call the Seattle car accident attorneys at Phillips Webster for a free consultation.
Learn More About:

What Can I Eat To Help Me Recover From a Personal Injury?

Auto Accidents, Car accidents, personal injury, personal injury attorney, personal injury lawyers, Seattle personal injury attorney, Seattle personal injury lawyer

January 13th, 2012: Law Blogger

Aside from the pain, discomfort, and stress that a victim of a personal injury in a car accident endures, it is perhaps the boredom that could be the most detrimental. Boredom can lead to not only depression and a potential of reinjury as people try to get up and resume their normal life, but it can also lead to eating…a lot.

For some people who suffer personal injuries, they have found some serious weight gain and no way of working it off. However, this is not to say that eating with an injury is bad. We all need to eat right? It’s just WHAT you eat that’s the problem.

For years there have been tons of physical therapists, nutritionists, and personal trainers that swear that a specific diet can help injured people recover. Now the scientific community has finally proved them right.

Can A Certain Diet Help Me Recover From An Injury?

Researchers from Queen Mary, University of London conducted research published this week in the Journal of Neuroscience to see what foods actually aid in personal injury prevention and recovery. Researchers found that victims should consider a fish dinner full of omega-3 fatty acids in order to speed up recovery and help damaged nerves regenerate.

A healthy diet of fish is nothing new and studies have proven that cultures with a diet of a lot of fish are considerably healthier overall. It’s only been in the last few decades that the benefits of Omega-3 fatty acids have been revealing how important they are to the body’s normal growth and development. However, the body doesn’t produce omega-3 fatty acids naturally, they have to be consumed in foods such as oily fish or in supplements.

The study first focused on peripheral nerve cells, which transmit signals between the brain and the spinal cord and the rest of the body. The researchers simulated damage in mice by stretching the cells or starving them of oxygen and then enriched the cells with omega-3 fatty acids. The result was decreased cell death and significant protection.

Researchers also induced with sciatic nerve damage on test mice (located in the lower back, the sciatic is generally the largest nerve in mammals and a common injury point in car accidents). They found that after introducing omega-3, the injury recoverd more quickly and more fully. The muscles on the mice were also less likely to waste following nerve damage.

Foods That Heal

Now that the official research is in showing real tangible results on a scientific physiological level, that doesn’t mean that decades of observation need be ignored. Through the ages, homeopathic remedies have been formulated through observation and many of these are related to both topical applications, but also diet.

According to experts some great healing foods are:

  • Almonds (fat/protein, zinc)
  • Apples (flavanoids – protect cells from oxygen damage, prevent inflammation
  • Broccoli (vitamin C, fiber, antibacterial)
  • Curry (anti-inflammatory)
  • Garlic (allicin – anti-inflammatory, improves macrophage function)
  • Grass fed beef (protein, vitamin, minerals)
  • Olive oil (Anti-inflammatory – works like ibuprofen)
  • Papaya (vitamins A, C and papain – enzyme that increases immune function)
  • Pineapple (bromelain – analgesic)
  • Salmon (omega-3′s)

Dietary considerations for a better recovery:

Protein

  • Experts always recommend an increase (non fatty) protein. This can compensate for any potential muscle loss due to lack of use.
  • Rather than one big steak or chicken breast at dinner, divide the meals into smaller portions. Protein should be eaten 4 to 6 times per day.
  •  Protein should consist of lean poultry, fish, eggs, lean beef, cottage cheese, or whey protein powder.

Carbohydrates

  • Carbohydrates are found in vegetables and fruits, whole grains, beans, legumes (nuts), and oats.
  • Avoid sugars and refined carbs (artificial sweeteners, high-fructose corn syrup, and most of the things that make junk food taste great). Don’t eat junk.
  • Watch carbohydrate intake post surgery and if there is an extensive recovery, too many refined carbs could put the patient in danger of diabetes.

Fats

  • Fats help in reducing inflammation, but there are good fats and bad fats. Omega-3′s are the hallmark fats for reducing inflammation. Monounsaturated fats are also helpful.
  • Good fat sources include: Fatty fish (salmon, mackerel, herring, sardines), flaxseeds, nuts, olive oil, avocados, pumpkin/sunflower/sesame seeds.
  • Watch out for bad fats that can hinder healing by increasing inflammation: Trans fats, omega-6 fats and saturated fats.

Puget Sound Personal Injury Attorney

Phillips Webster is a law firm with a substantial track record of success Personal Injury Litigation. We take the time to fully assess the injured party’s case in order to assure that the victim receives the compensation they deserve. Call our Personal Injury Attorneys today for a free consultation.
Learn More About:

Some Good News For Victims of SCI in Car Accidents

personal injury, personal injury attorney, personal injury lawyers, Seattle personal injury attorney, Seattle personal injury lawyer, spinal cord injuries, spinal cord injury, spinal injuries

January 12th, 2012: Law Blogger

We’ve witnessed first hand the pain that a victim and a family goes through when someone suffers a Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) in a car accident. It is not only a highly emotional experience waiting and hearing the news as to whether you or your loved one is going to walk or function normally again, but it stays through the exhausting and expensive therapy that follows.

An SCI is a long process of physical therapy, retraining muscles, and adjusting habits just to transition back into some semblance of a normal life. Regardless of whether this is mere recovery or learning to live with paralysis, there is one guarantee, life will never be the same.

However, though spinal cord understanding and research is slow in developing, hope comes from the medical community periodically. We like to highlight these pieces of research because it makes us think of our clients, past and current, that are struggling with SCI, but are learning to cope and over come until a cure is found.

Spinal Cord Research

There is still a massive argument over the function and utilization of embryonic stem cells. Though the arguments against are largely philosophical, the scientific community is pretty united in the future of stem cells. Ask the vast majority of SCL victims of car accidents that struggle every day with paralysis or back pain and they will tell you, their hope for recovery outweighs their prior assumptions about the technology. Yet, for patients that are still on the fence, this new research uses only adult stem cells.

That’s why SCL victims may be hopeful for new research at the University of Minnesota Stem Cell Institute. Dr. Ann Parr is a U of M neurosurgeon, professor, researcher, and part of a team focused on spinal cord injuries and stem cell research.

“It is a really exciting time right now in the field of spinal cord injury,” she said.

Her team is trying to develop a treatment that could someday help people like Jablonski.

Her lab is currently creating oligodendrocyte cells cells from mice in the lab.  These are cells that insulate the nerves in the spinal cord and brain. After a spinal cord injury there are many nerves that are actually preserved and may have the ability to function again. However they’ve lost their insulation.

“[Without oligodendrocyte cells] they’re sort of like bare wires,” Parr elaborated. “If we could replace the oligodendrocytes in the injured spinal cord that they may actually allow these nerves to function again,” said Parr.

Her research begins with adult skin cells, which she converts to stem cells, then transforms them into the insulating oligodendrocyte cells. This method is better, because using a patient’s own cells reduces the risk of rejection that can come with using embryonic stem cells.

She said there are also many drugs in clinical trials that could minimize cell damage immediately after a spinal cord injury. Doctor Parr said there are promising drug therapies that could be available within a year or two to help treat those with new spinal cord injuries.

Though hopeful, she said, “It could be years before research like hers leads to an approved treatment for those already living with a spinal cord injury.”

Faster Regeneration

According to the Foundation for Spinal Cord Injury Prevention, Care, and Cure, spinal cord injury in a car accident is the most common way of suffering a spinal cord injury. When these serious life threatening injuries happen, cellular degeneration begins in about 24 to 36 hours and could result in more serious irreversible permanent damage.

Anterograde degeneration - The part of the axon that remains connected to the cell body may degenerate a short distance (e.g. a millimeter or less), but usually it survives at least in the short term.

Orthograde degeneration - The degeneration of a nerve fiber that has been separated from its nutritive center by injury or disease, characterized by segmentation of the myelin and resulting in atrophy and destruction of the axon.

The overall term for these types of degeneration is Wallerian Degeneration. When this happens, oligodendrocyte cells as described above, become extremely important. You see, SCI regeneration is extremely slow, in fact, some of the slowest in the body and this is because the nerves lack oligodendrocyte cells.

By being able to construct oligodendrocyte cells in the lab that the body won’t reject, the degeneration process can be stopped and reversed. This can potentially increase the likelihood of recovery tenfold.

Washington Spinal Cord Injury Attorney

SCI victims of an auto accident are seeing positive strides in treatments in the last decade related to stem cells. Even the mortality rate and degree of recovery has increased slightly and goes up every year. However, all treatments cost money and the medical bills can pile up throughout a lifetime into hundreds of thousands of dollars (sometimes millions). That’s why compensation is so important.

Phillips Webster is a full service law firm with a substantial track record of success Personal Injury Litigation. We take the time to fully assess the injured party’s case in order to assure that the victim receives the compensation they deserve. Call our Personal Injury Attorneys today for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Are Drunk Drivers Aware Of Their Dangerous Behavior?

Car Accident, Car accidents, DUI, DUI accident, personal injury, Seattle car accident attorney, Seattle Car Accident Lawyers, Washington car accident attorney

January 5th, 2012: Law Blogger

New Years Eve has passed and slowly the tally of drunk drivers caught over that notorious night and the DUI heavy holiday season come in from local and state law enforcement agencies. So far, the tally looks pretty normal with some municipalities showing an increase and some a decrease. But what they don’t seem to tally are the excuses.

When some people make a mistake, they like to blame the alcohol. “I was drunk!” they might say, but this is seldom an excuse used by drunk drivers for obvious reasons. So how do they explain away their behavior? Well, who knows or cares, because as new research shows, there are no good excuses when it comes to DUI, because the drivers are fully aware of what they’re doing.

That’s right, DUI drivers can now give a laundry list of excuses, but that won’t eliminate the fact that they were completely aware that they had been drinking and were then getting into a car and that is not only a mistake, but illegal.

DUI Awareness Study

The new study called Alcohol Effects on Performance Monitoring and Adjustment: Affect Modulation and Impairment of Evaluative Cognitive Control, can be seen in the upcoming edition of the Journal of Abnormal Psychology and was paid for by the The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and the University of Missouri Research Board.

The study took brain tests of 67 people and showed that alcohol dulls a mechanism in the brain that tells an individual to stop their behavior when they realize they’re making mistakes. Essentially, the study shows that people who commit blunders while under the influence of alcohol know they’re doing it; they just don’t care.

“This isn’t the first study that shows alcohol alters the behavior of those who consume it, but it’s the first to show they don’t care that they’re making mistakes,” said Bartholow, associate professor of psychology at the University of Missouri-Columbia and lead researcher.

The implications of this study is that people who put the public in danger by drinking and getting behind the wheel can’t blame it on not having control because they are fully aware of their behavior, the potential for serious car accidents.

The study group derived of people between the ages of 21 and 35 that were broken into three groups:

Group A – One-third of the participants received drinks with enough alcohol to raise their blood levels to just under the legal driving limit of .08 blood alcohol content (BAC). Researchers noted that all participants in the control group got the same amount and they didn’t measure if the effect was gradual.

Group B – Another third of the participants received non-alcoholic placebo drinks, however they didn’t know if the drinks contained alcohol or not.

Group C - A third received drinks they knew contained no alcohol.

Each group was then assigned tasks designed to elicit mistakes. Researchers used devices on the participants to measure brain activity as the subjects took the tests. Medical technology exists to measure brain activity for impulse control, emotion, mood and other functions. With these devices they recorded results as they observed various factors in participants behavior during the tests such as

  • Mood and demeanor
  • Accuracy in computer tasks
  • Perception of accuracy in the tasks

Though this was a computerized test and not a driving simulator, the moral and reactionary tests were similar. When the mechanism is working, researchers observed that the participants that didn’t ingest alcohol slow down and either tried not to make the mistake again, or they take corrective action. However, the control group that had alcohol was observed to be more likely to disregard the moral stop sign, even though they knew what they were doing.

It became apparent that non-drinkers had normal activity in the part of the brain that regulated recognizing mistakes, whereas drinkers had less activity.

“Normally, someone who makes mistakes is aware and makes an effort not to make that mistake again,” Bartholow said. “Drinkers made less of an effort or simply moved past their errors even though they knew they’d made errors.”

The dulling of the brain’s mistake alarm only occurred among people who had alcoholic beverages, he said, and added that using alcohol doesn’t allow someone to escape culpability.

Drinking and Driving In Washington State

Washington State DUI laws, like most laws around the world, prohibit the operation of a motor vehicle by a driver not only under the influence of alcohol, but also under the influence of a controlled substance such as marijuana, cocaine, inhalants and other intoxicants. These include prescription drugs that specifically warn against operating machinery.

The .08 percent limit is a general standard used across the US to determine which drivers are “impaired.” Washington has lower BAC limits for commercial drivers (.04) and drivers under the age of 21 (.02). This ensures that underage drivers and commercial drivers stay alert and responsible.

The DUI limits translate as such:

DRINK EQUIVALENTS: 1 drink / 1 dose equals:

  • 1 1/2 ounces of rum, rye, scotch, brandy, gin, vodka etc.
  • 1 12-oz. bottle of normal-strength beer 3-4%
  • Approximately 7 – 8 oz. of Malt Liquor, or a strong micro brew.
  • 3 ounces of fortified wine
  • 4 – 5 ounces of table wine

Allow an hour per dose before returning to work. Example 2 glasses of wine, allow two hours from time of last dose.

Seattle DUI Victims Lawyers

If you or a loved one sustain serious personal injuries caused by a drunk driver then it is imperative that you find a good lawyer with a proven track record of success in personal injury litigation. Call Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Could Increasing Car Insurance PIP Costs Lead To Injury Claim Denials?

insurance attorney, Insurance Company, insurance policies, lost income, medical bills, personal injury, police report, puget sound personal injury

January 2nd, 2012: Law Blogger

The roads have seemingly been getting safer over the past few years as car manufacturers build safer vehicles, road/civic design becomes more advanced, and driver education becomes more effective. This has led to a downward trend in car accident and personal injury claims against insurance companies.

The insurance companies love this because this means more profit (god forbid they lower their rates as a result). However, this trend may be changing. New findings from an Insurance Research Council (IRC) study of auto injury claim trends indicate that the costs associated with auto insurance injury claims have begun to inch their way up nationwide.

Any surge, however insignificant, not only could mean an adjustment in rates in order to shore up shareholder growth expectations, but it could mean an increase in tactics used by auto insurance companies to avoid or outright deny personal injury protection (PIP) claims.

Surge in Claims or Costs?

The report called “Trends in Auto Injury Claims, 2011 Edition,” documents automobile personal injury claims by state, using private passenger auto claim data from national and state-level statistical reporting agencies. They then review the data and give both national trends, but also predictive synopsis.

You see, even though the average cost of injury claims has been increasing steadily in the last several years, the number of claims has actually stayed steady. This has produced relatively stable personal injury claim cost projection per insured vehicle. However, the study data shows that on a national basis, the claims show no sign of decreasing like they had been in the past few years.

Still, this has caused the insurance companies to fear higher costs overall. PIP claim costs per insured vehicle increased more than 18% from 2008 to 2010 according to the report. In fact, 2010 marked the first year since 1994 that bodily injury (BI) claim frequency did not decline and this extended into 2011.

“These are not encouraging findings for insurers or drivers,” said Elizabeth Sprinkel, senior vice president of The Institutes. “While we hope these findings represent temporary conditions, we can’t be sure that is the case and can’t afford to ignore the factors driving rising claim costs.”

Methods of Avoidance

Insurance companies are particularly adept to keeping their costs low and their profits high. They do this by influencing legislation through robust political contributions to using marketing tactics to shame consumers into thinking that they are in some way taking advantage of the system by claiming what is rightfully (and contractually) theirs.

Insurance companies often send representatives to hospitals to speak to injured individuals, contact family members, and use other nefarious methods to discourage claims or encourage fast settlements far below what is needed or fair. This is all done in the name of profit. We encourage victims NOT TO SIGN ANYTHING unless legal council is present.

Some methods of claim avoidance that may require you to retain legal council are:

Delayed Claims – This is a method in which the insurance company makes the process so long and tedious that the claimant forgets details, becomes disorganized, and frustrated (perhaps to the point of yelling). This allows the company to further delay or reject the claim on basis that is unrelated to the incident itself.

Long Review Periods – This is part of the delay process, but could result in claims that go to overloaded committees that could have a stockpile of hundreds (or thousands) of cases, yet, these committees have a limited review period and only meet a few times per month.

Police Report Disputes – The company can disagree with the police report and use these disputes to deny a claim. Without experienced legal council on your side this is very hard to reconcile.

Customer Service and Paperwork – Paperwork and the runaround by customer service agents is another way of frustrating claimants into just giving up. Who cares if they lose your business? It saves them money in the long run and the insurance company you threaten to go to may actually be owned by the insurance company you just left.

Many consumers don’t experience these problems for base claims that don’t result in injuries. Once these become PIP claims the costs spike. Injury claims then fall into a whole different category of treatment. Insurance companies are not in the business of paying out on claims. If they were, the insurance industry in America wouldn’t be one of the largest industries in the world whose annual profits eclipse the GDP of most third world countries.

Puget Sound Personal Injury Attorney

All in all, the answer to the question above is “yes,” the insurance companies could very well use the increased PIP costs to justify denying victims in need from the insurance that is rightly theirs. Though it shouldn’t be required, sometimes an injured party and their loved ones need an experienced legal advocate on their side to expedite the process and circumvent the blatant red tape set in place to discourage victims from seeking compensation they deserve.

If you or someone you know has been injured in a car accident anywhere in Washington state, you need a skilled lawyer to deal with the insurance companies to assure you the best settlement. Call the Seattle car accident attorneys at Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Are The Crosswalks Near My Child’s School Safe?

Crosswalk Accident, pedestrian accident attorneys, pedestrian accident lawyers, pedestrian accidents, pedestrian injury, personal injury

December 23rd, 2011: Law Blogger

Many municipalities and schools around the state like to say that they are extremely concerned about the welfare of children as they walk to and from school. These sentiments are sincere and shared by all caring individuals in a community. This is why school zones are established, crossing guards are hired or volunteer, conduct while crossing the street is taught to the kids, and speed limits are strictly enforced.

However, as we monitor the news, we find that a child is hit by a car, and personally injured or killed everyday somewhere in the United States. There are tons of reasons why this happens, but many times the culprit lies in the fact that school traffic is only monitored to a certain point and in many cases these zones flow into residential areas that have no speed bumps, crosswalks, or sidewalks for that matter.

However, dangerous routes and intersections can be identified and the Washington Traffic Safety Commission (WTSC) has created a program that could help make them safer.

Identifying Problem Areas

Some parents choose where they are going to live and raise their children specifically around the quality and proximity to schools. Even with that, one thing that makes any parents extremely nervous is setting their elementary school aged kids loose to travel to and from school.

Some parents choose to forgo the stress it causes by adjusting their schedules around the school schedule in order to pick up their kids, however, some parents don’t have this option because either their work is too much of commute to accommodate that schedule or their job doesn’t allow flexibility. Regardless, there are ways to make the route a little safer.

Identifying dangerous intersections:

Walk the route to school alone searching for the safest route that feature:

  • Side walks
  • Crosswalks
  • Lights
  • Light traffic
  • Other kids
  • Direct the route toward crossing guards

Walk or ride you bike along the route to school with your kids several times:

  • Point out dangerous places to avoid.
  • Show them the correct way to cross as each crosswalk.
  • Show them the correct side of the street to walk/ride on.
  • Show them good habits.
  • Show them what to do, where to go if they feel in danger.
  • Time the route and set an after school schedule.

Create a Safe Network:

  • Get to know other parents who allow their kids to walk/ride to school and create a walking/riding group.
  • Find out if there is a parent or friend that live along the route that the child can go to if they run into danger while on the way home.
  • Meet the crossing guards.
  • Know who at the school is in charge of the safety of the walking/riding children.
  • Ask local law enforcement about problem intersections and pedestrian accident reports.

Changing Routes To Make Them Safer

Children will cut corners where they can. Young children will generally stay within designated routes, but as they get older and more independent, parents find that their kids will cut through fields, cut through alleys, and even yards in order cut mere seconds off of their route to school. In doing this, these short cuts could lead to dangerous intersections. That’s why the WTSC has put aside some money to help parents change things in their community.

School Zone Flashing Lights Grant – After identifying an intersection (or even a non-intersection), go to your school official and ask them to review and endorse your intent to place a flashing warning light. Then contact WTSC, fill out the proper forms, have the official sign them, and apply for the grant.

Mini-Grants Under $500– WTSC will set up equipment (vests, flags, etc), a set of rules, and training if you want to create, update, or expand a crossing guard program. You just need to find an advocate at the school, fill out the proper forms from WTSC, and have that official sign them. Note: this is only in school zones

Law Enforcement Equipment Grants – WTSC will also provide more radar guns and rain jackets for law enforcement that patrol school zones. This will make local law enforcement happy and may inspire an extra patrol here and there along common school routes.

Seattle Pedestrian Accident Attorney

Phillips Webster represents families of victims who have been injured or died in car accidents in Washington state. They are skilled attorneys in wrongful death lawsuits and personal injury lawsuits with years of experience that they will use to  assure the you get the compensation you deserve. Call today for a free consultation.

Learn More About: