FOLLOW US: Twitter facebook
Washington & Nationwide (Toll Free 24/7)
(800) 708-6000
California
(213) 808-6740

Free Case Review

  • * First Name:
  • * Last Name:
  • * Email:
  • * Phone Number:
  • Comment:
  • Accept Terms *
    *Denotes Required Field

News Updates via Email

If you would like to receive our news updates right to your inbox, provide us with your email address. We won't use your email for anything besides sending you news updates from our blog.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Dangerous Drug Information

If you or a loved one has been injured by the side effects of a defective drug, our defective drug attorneys can help you and your family. We are currently investigating the following dangerous drugs:

Drug Side Effects and Injuries

Law Blog Categories

Car Accidents
3 Reasons to Hire Phillips Webster

Our attorneys have decades of experience negotiating with insurance companies regarding all types of vehicle accidents. If you have been injured in a wreck, contact us today.

  1. We represent EVERYONE in need anywhere in Washington - Minor and Major Injuries
  2. Experienced trial attorneys that will fight for your right to recover compensation
  3. FREE Case Review and we only get paid if you get paid
Learn more about our:
Seattle Car Accident Lawyers

Verdicts & Settlements

$20 MILLION - Commercial Injury
Confidential settlement for a commercial injury case

$19  Million - Grant of Coverage
Grant of coverage in insurance coverage case

$2 MILLION - INSURANCE BAD FAITH
Settlement in insurance bad faith case

$1.5 MILLION - CAR ACCIDENT WRONGFUL DEATH
Vancouver, Washington car accident that resulted in a death

$1 MILLION - DUI ACCIDENT VICTIM
Settlement for young man hit by a drunk driver

Our jury trial experience shows in the results we get both inside and outside of the courtroom.

More Verdicts and Settlements

Posts Tagged ‘wrongful death attorney’

Can I Get Wrongful Death Compensation If I Lose a Child in a Car Accident?

Washington Wrongful Death Attorney, Washington wrongful death lawyer, Wrongful Death, wrongful death attorney, wrongful death eligibility

December 7th, 2011: Law Blogger

The single hardest thing any parent can go through is when they lose a son or daughter in a car accident. The suddenness of the loss and the questions can drive a person to a nervous breakdown. How did it happen? Who were they with? Why were they with them? Why were they where there? Why wasn’t I with them? Who is at fault for their death?

Sometimes the answers are just as painful as the death itself, however, once these questions have been established, then you may be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit by going over the details with your lawyer.

With an experienced attorney’s help, investigating the circumstances surrounding the death of your child can be much easier both emotionally and bureaucratically. The attorney will gather tangible data we cover in this article in order to determine the amount of compensation.

When filing a wrongful death lawsuit, you are seeking just compensation from the individual that, through their negligent actions, caused the death of your son or daughter. A wrongful death lawsuit is a civil trial where you are the “plaintiff” and those you seek compensation from are the “defendants.”

It is up to the plaintiff to determine fault or negligence by the defendant, which lead directly of indirectly to the death of your loved one. The task is difficult, but with the proper council, many families have received the justice they deserve.

From Whom Do I Seek Compensation?

There must be a source of compensation and the defendant must have money in order to pay whatever settlement or amount the court charges. There must also be a determination of negligence or breach of duty on the defendant’s part. Once that has been established, these individuals are supposed to be backed by insurance companies by law in order to compensate for damages, both to victims and their property, but also in the families in case of wrongful death. However, there are three main sources attorneys investigate:

Individuals – Generally, in the case of an automobile accident, there is a person driving, a police officer, a doctor, etc, that is specifically named in the lawsuit. These individuals are the alleged negligent parties that may have caused the death of your child. They are supposed to be covered by an insurance company by law. However, if they are not, they must take the compensation out of their own funds if they are indeed found negligent. This can be in the form of cash, leans on property, and garnishment of wages.

Government – Governments including municipalities, counties, or states have a responsibility to provide safety for their citizens. The police and response infrastructures have procedures and a code of conduct they must abide by also. Often if a child dies because of an infrastructure problem (pothole, sinkhole, blind corner, unmarked median, abandoned or dangerously parked city vehicles, etc) there has been a clear history of complaints and/or data linked to the problem prior to the death. If they have not taken reasonable measures to recognized hazardous roadways and intersections, then they should be held accountable for injuries and deaths that are caused by these hazards.

Insurance Companies – Believe it or not, but there are people who feel bad about suing an insurance company over the death of their loved one. But keep in mind that the company insures motorists by a risk-to-profitability scale. They have already taken into account the risk of the negligent driver by age, credit rating, driving history, and vehicle type. However, they will do anything to avoid paying out on claims, thus a campaign of through news and advertising over several decades just to make it so that families feel guilty for seeking compensation. They are also proactive on accidents involving death or serious injury and in fact, you may have gotten contacted by an insurance agent. Make sure you log that call and jot down whatever was said. Most of all, do not sign anything an insurance company asks you to sign without first having your legal representative review it.

Evidence of Wrongful Death

As stated above, there must be a determination of negligence, the actions of an individual or entity directly or indirectly caused the death of your son or daughter. The driver also has a duty to keep the passenger safe and follow the rules of the road. If they violate this duty called “breech of duty” then they may be liable for the death of the victim. To prove these things, evidence is required, and some of the evidence that is gathered is:

Arrests –Driving under the influence (DUI) is easily one of the largest and most senseless causes of vehicular death. If the other driver involved in the accident was arrested for DUI at the scene, regardless of who the police report cites as fault, you may be entitled to compensation.

Circumstances – If there was road construction, another traffic stop, another accident obstructing traffic, or any other alternate circumstances surrounding the accident, then there may be negligence on the side of outside sources. It is important to review all statements and details of the scene of the accident.

Citations – If other drivers were cited for infractions related to the accident then the accident may have been caused by another driver’s negligence. These minor infractions may establish negligence regardless of what it was for.

Medical Care – The trauma care in the Puget Sound area is some of the best in the country, but sometimes victims fall through the cracks. If your loved one died in the care of the emergency ward staff, you may want to review the circumstances with the help of legal council.

Police Report – As the spouse you may obtain the police report and speak to the officers that investigated the car accident scene in order to learn details that may have been omitted from the report. Omissions and sloppy reports often suspend justice.

Response – Many wrongful death cases have found that the accident victim’s death could have been prevented if the proper procedures had been followed by the police and medical response team. If you find these procedures or the care questionable then it is best to find a legal review of those procedures.

Signals – Many accidents could have been avoided if the intersection or road had proper signs, signals, and maintenance. The crash history of the section of road or intersection could also be important in a wrongful death lawsuit caused by a car accident.

Puget Sound Wrongful Death Attorney

When you have been stricken with the tragic circumstance of losing a loved one due to the negligence of another person in a car accident, then it is very important that you do not sign anything without a lawyer present. The lawyer is there to represent you and your interests in your time of need.

The law firm of Phillips Webster represents families of victims who have been wrongfully killed in Washington State. They are skilled attorneys in wrongful death lawsuits and personal injury lawsuits with years of experience that they will use to  assure the you get the compensation you deserve.

Call Phillips Webster today for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Am I Eligible to File a Wrongful Death Lawsuit in Washington State?

Washington Wrongful Death Attorney, Washington wrongful death lawyer, Wrongful Death, wrongful death attorney, wrongful death eligability

March 30th, 2011: Law Blogger

Wrongful death lawyerThe sudden loss of a loved one in a car accident is one of the most painful things a person can endure in their lifetimes. The person you loved, depended on, and though would be there for many years or decades to come walks out the door on a routine day and never comes back. The shock of that revelation can be physically painful.

But to further compound the emotional grief, long mourning, explaining the loss to youngsters, and making proper arrangement is the financial hardship associated with the ordeal. The deceased most likely had a source of income, perhaps even a lucrative one, that may have been the sole resource for a family with a bright future, cut short by tragedy.

This type of loss, both emotional and financial, deserve proper compensation. To find out if you are eligible for compensation surrounding the death of your loved one you must fall into a certain set of criteria.

Washington Law And Wrongful Death

To determine eligibility, perhaps the best thing to do is consult a lawyer for there are many criteria that one could define as eligible, but there are a few simple starting criteria that require answering such as:

Is the deceased, in fact, deceased?

Was his or her death the direct result of someone’s negligence?

Did the deceased leave behind dependents who are suffering financially due to the loss?

Are you a direct relative or established domestic partner who is suffering financially due to the loss?

According to established laws in Washington State, the negligent party that caused the accident resulting in the death of your loved one may be liable and can be pursued in civil court for financial and emotional damages associated with that death. That is stated in the right of action section:

RCW 4.20.010Wrongful Death Right of Action – “When the death of a person is caused by the wrongful act, neglect or default of another his personal representative may maintain an action for damages against the person causing the death; and although the death shall have been caused under such circumstances as amount, in law, to a felony.”

The law also states who is eligible. The State of Washington is one of the few states that currently allow domestic partners to register as such and are extended the rights of relatives or married individuals. This is not always in the case of same sex couples, but also long-term unions of two individuals.

RCW 4.20.020Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Action – “Every such action shall be for the benefit of the wife, husband, state registered domestic partner, child or children, including stepchildren, of the person whose death shall have been so caused. If there be no wife, husband, state registered domestic partner, or such child or children, such action may be maintained for the benefit of the parents, sisters, or brothers, who may be dependent upon the deceased person for support, and who are resident within the United States at the time of his death. In every such action the jury may give such damages as, under all circumstances of the case, may to them seem just.”

Elements of a Wrongful Death Case

Once you have been deemed eligible there are certain parts of the lawsuit that add to the total compensation beyond the hard costs of the accident. These expenses are both hard documentable expenses and nontangibles. The list below is a general list of what an eligible party may seek for compensation.

Medical Expenses – Sometimes the pain of loosing a loved one is only made worse by having to spend hours, days, or months watching them struggle and eventually succumb to their injuries. This can be extremely costly, not only monetarily, but emotionally.

Funeral Expenses – Depending on the wishes of the deceased and their impact on the community, funerals have been known to be sizeable and costly. Though a funeral can be very low cost it is up to the family to determine their needs, not the defendant or their insurance company.

Pain and Suffering – Pain and suffering is a real and sometimes long lasting consideration in a lawsuit. Grief and mourning can literally cripple a loved one and make it so they can’t work or enjoy life like they did before. This has been known to lead to clinical depression and serious health issues due to loss of appetite or juxtaposed, increased weight issues.

Loss of Earnings – As above, this is not only loss of earnings from that of the deceased but the loss of earnings of eligible individuals during mourning. They do not ask to be stripped of their loved one suddenly and thus must be fairly compensated for time off.

Loss of Benefits and Insurance – The deceased children and spouse may be left without health benefits and insurance. This essential shelter is one of the things that many people specifically do to protect their family and needs to be retained as if they were alive.

Loss of Future Earnings – The loss of earnings from the deceased is set on a payment schedule that dwindles over time based on earnings at the time of death. This can also include increased potential earnings if they had a bright future (were up for a promotion, were being prospected by a sports team, or receiving their doctorate in medicine).

Loss of Companionship – Many people who lose a husband or wife have lost their “soul mate” and their best friend also. This can be like losing a piece of yourself. Later in life it can strip away a person they thought would be there trusted companion when they needed someone when they could no longer find a mate.

Puget Sound Wrongful Death Attorney

When you have been stricken with the tragic circumstance of losing a loved one due to the negligence of another person in a car accident, then it is very important that you do not sign anything without a lawyer present. The lawyer is there to represent you and your interests in your time of need.

The law firm of Phillips Webster represents families of victims who have been wrongfully killed in Washington State. They are skilled attorneys in wrongful death lawsuits and personal injury lawsuits with years of experience that they will use to  assure the you get the compensation you deserve.

Call Phillips Webster today for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

How Do I Determine Future Earnings for a Wrongful Death or Personal Injury Lawsuit?

personal injury attorney, personal injury lawyer, Washington Wrongful Death Attorney, Washington wrongful death lawyer, Wrongful Death, wrongful death attorney

February 1st, 2011: Law Blogger

Seattle Victims LawyerWhen a loved one is seriously injured or killed in a car accident due to the negligence of another driver, it’s not just the victim that is effected, but the whole family. The income and future earning potential is lost and the future of the family is derailed. This could be the difference between a child going to college or going into the work force immediately out of high school.

The difference between a college graduate’s earnings and a high school diploma is millions over a lifetime. The consequences could lead to the downward trend of earning for generations of a family just because one person was drunk, on their cell phone, or otherwise not paying attention leading to a serious injury accident.

All of this is the reason why compensation for future earnings is so incredibly important. It is not merely compensation for negligence, it is compensation for disruption of innocent people’s lives. The way it’s calculated has been standardized in a somewhat complicated, but make sense fashion.

Eligibility for Compensation of Future Earnings

Ultimately, the award for future earnings is up to a jury. There have been many reasons for compensation for future earnings, some of them are very apparent, but some of them do not manifest themselves on the surface that a jury can actually see. Here are some things that make a victim eligible:

Death – The loss of a loved one is permanent and compensation for their future potential, though speculative, will never make up for their loss. Though each case is unique, there is one indisputable fact, the family has lost a loved one and compensation is due.

Permanent Injury – This is everything from amputation of two limbs to paralysis. Brain injuries are also a prevalent part of these injuries since they can take a lifetime to recover from. They cannot only stop a person from working, but also finding and retaining gainful employment for the rest of their lives. Permanent injuries generally also require extensive care and, in some instances, may lead to compensation for future earnings of the spouse also.

Amputation – Amputation of a limb is bad, but workers are often able to return to their previous job. That is, unless their previous job is a first responder (fire, police, EMT) or in sports. Then, though they are able to in some way be associated with the profession, they are never again able to work in the same capacity and reach their full potential.

Mental – A mental injury can devastate a victim, but it is very hard to prove in court. Severe depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can lead to serious consequences such as loss of friends, family, chemical dependency, and job loss.

Calculating Future Earnings

As stated above, there are many unique instances for calculating earnings. Sometimes it is very simple due to the victim’s work history, other times it is based on their potential.

Actual Earnings - If a person has been working in a parts manufacturing plant for 5 years, it is very easy to take their earnings and calculate their future earnings.

Potential Earnings – A young doctor working as an intern at a hospital or a baseball player working on a farm-team waiting to be brought up to the big leagues is a whole different story. Their potential future earnings could be in the multimillions and the award should reflect that.

Compound Interest – Compound interest is how most money works but not future earnings. A person makes $100, at 10% interst, the come out with an annual income of $10, and on and on it goes, earning more and more money. Future income is the opposite.

Future Income Calculation “Discount Rate” – In computing lost income, courts and juries must compute a similar adjustment in reverse, as the earnings of a worker over the worker’s lifetime are not paid out all at once at the beginning of the worker’s career, but instead are paid out over many years of work.  Thus a yearly salary of $2,593 ten years from now would be worth only $1,000 today.

The rate used to make these calculations is called the “discount rate.” This term is used because future earnings are reduced to account for the fact that they are being paid now, rather than over the course of years. Thus they can be invested now and grow as compound interest.

The discount rate works exactly the opposite of compounding, as the further in time that a payment is to be made (or a salary received), the less that the payment (or salary) is worth today. If it didn’t, then the defendant would be paying out more than the victim would have earned due to interest, plus this gives a clear stopping point.

“Present Value” – The amount that all of a worker’s future earnings are worth at the present time are determined. Then the court discounts these amounts using a discount rate. After being discounted, the amount must then be adjusted upward for the likely inflation that will take place over the period of time involved. The result of these calculations is called the “present value”. The present value of the earnings then represents the amount to which the survivors are entitled.

Seattle Lawyer Represents Victims

People in society are often conditioned to believe that seeking the maximum compensation for their injuries or loss of a loved one is in some way wrong. Nothing can be further from the truth when you sit down and calculate the consequences of someone else’s actions. As a victim and their family, you not only deserve compensation, by law you are entitled to it.

As your legal representative we will help you determine your family’s full future earnings potential and fight hard to get you compensation to assure a bright future for you and your loved ones.

Phillips Webster represents families of victims who have been wrongfully killed in Washington State. They are skilled attorneys in wrongful death lawsuits and personal injury lawsuits with years of experience that they will use to  assure the you get the compensation you deserve.

Call Phillips Webster today for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Can I Get Compensation If My Husband Has Died in a Car Accident?

Car accidents, personal injury, Seattle car accident attorney, Seattle Car Accident Lawyers, wrong way accidents, Wrongful Death, wrongful death attorney, wrongful death lawyer

January 27th, 2011: Law Blogger

Seattle Car Accident LawyersLiterally thousands of women every year lose their spouse and best friend to car accidents. They walk out the door to go to work or to the store and never walk back through. This can be devastating both emotionally and financially to a spouse and family that depend on the love and income of their lost loved one.

If you are asking yourself, “Can I Get Compensation If My Husband Has Died in a Car Accident?” then you have probably gone through many facets of the grieving process and are now seeking answers. There are may questions that you must first ask yourself to help you determine whether compensation is available to you. (see below)

Once these questions have been established, then you may be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit by going over the details with your lawyer and, with their help, investigating the circumstances surrounding the death of your loved one in order to determine the amount of compensation.

When you file your wrongful death lawsuit, it is a civil trial where you are the “plaintiff” and those you seek compensation from are the “defendants.” It is up to the plaintiff to determine fault or negligence by the defendant, which lead directly of indirectly to the death of your loved one. This is difficult, but with the proper council, many have received the justice they deserve.

Compensation Questions to Determine Wrongful Death

1) Police Report – As the spouse you may obtain the police report and speak to the officers that investigated the car accident scene in order to learn details that may have been omitted from the report. Omissions and sloppy reports often suspend justice.

2) Citations – If other drivers were cited for infractions related to the accident then the accident may have been caused by another driver’s negligence. These minor infractions may establish negligence regardless of what it was for.

3) Arrests – Driving under the influence (DUI) is easily one of the largest and most senseless causes of vehicular death. If the other driver involved in the accident was arrested for DUI at the scene, regardless of who the police report cites as fault, you may be entitled to compensation.

4) Response – Many wrongful death cases have found that the accident victim’s death could have been prevented if the proper procedures had been followed by the police and medical response team. If you find these procedures or the care questionable then it is best to find a legal review of those procedures.

5) Medical Care – The trauma care in the Puget Sound area is some of the best in the country, but sometimes victims fall through the cracks. If your loved one died in the care of the emergency ward staff, you may want to review the circumstances with the help of legal council.

6) Signals – Many accidents could have been avoided if the intersection or road had proper signs, signals, and maintenance. The crash history of the section of road or intersection could also be important in a wrongful death lawsuit caused by a car accident.

7) Circumstances – If there was road construction, another traffic stop, another accident obstructing traffic, or any other alternate circumstances surrounding the accident, then there may be negligence on the side of outside sources. It is important to review all statements and details of the scene of the accident.

Sources of Compensation

To seek compensation there must be a source from where the compensation comes. When determining who is named, as stated above, there has to be a determination of negligence or fault. Once that has been established many times these individuals are backed by insurance companies for these very reasons.

Insurance Companies – They insure motorists by a risk-to-profitability scale and will do anything to avoid paying out on claims. If this is their business model then victim’s families can be rest assured the company is going to do whatever they can to avoid paying out on a wrongful death lawsuit. You may have already gotten contacted by an insurance agent. Make sure you log that call and jot down whatever was said. Most of all, do not sign anything an insurance company asks you to sign without first having your legal representative review it.

City, County, State – Their police and response infrastructures have procedures and a code of conduct they must abide by. Conversely, towns and cities are held to the standard that they provide a reasonable amount of safety to their citizens and visitors. If they have not taken measures to recognized hazardous roadways and intersections, particularly after a clear history of complaints and crash data, then they should be held accountable for injuries and deaths that are caused by these hazards.

Individuals – Individuals such as the other driver, the negligent police officer, the negligent doctor, etc, may be named in the lawsuit over the death of your husband if fault has been determined. They are either covered by an insurance company or must take the compensation out of their own funds if a verdict turns out positively for the plaintiff (you).

Seattle Car Accident Attorneys

The dedicated staff of skilled lawyers at Phillips Webster have represented hundreds of widows and families who are seeking answers, justice, and compensation for the deaths of their husbands, fathers, and loved ones. These lawsuits are not easy. They often require hours of investigation and litigation. They also can be emotionally draining, but many have found the process rewarding when the lawsuits are finally are settled either inside or outside of court.

Families who have experienced the wrongful death of a loved one due to the negligence of another should seek an experienced car accident wrongful death attorney to represent their best interests and get the compensation they deserve. Call Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Wrongful Death Lawsuit Alleges Medical Malpractice Surrounding Woman and Infant H1N1 Death

Medical Malpractice, medical malpractice lawyer, Washington Wrongful Death Attorney, Washington wrongful death lawyer, Wrongful Death, wrongful death attorney, wrongful death lawyer

January 19th, 2011: Law Blogger

Wrongful Death AttorneyYou may remember the panic two years ago over the H1N1 virus, ominously named the swine flu because it is suspected to have originated in pigs. Starting in Mexico it spread, but the media hype it garnered over the word “pandemic” proved to be much more potent than the virus itself.

But that doesn’t mean that people didn’t die by the hundreds as the virus stretched its snout all the way up to the Northwest. To those it effected, they may never be that sick in their lives again. To others who lost loved ones the helpless feeling and the grieving still enters their lives even today as is the case Kenneth Flyte, of Puyallup, who lost his wife and infant daughter to the terrible disease.

Allegations of Medical Malpractice

The whole thing started in June 2009 when Kathryn Flyte began to feel under the weather. She quickly developed severe flu-like symptoms. This scared both her and her husband Kenneth since she was six months pregnant with the couple’s daughter, so they went to the hospital. She was examined and sent home with what hospital workers thought was a normal bought of flu, but it wasn’t just the run of the mill strain.

Her health deteriorated so quickly that they rushed back to Summit View Clinic to save both her and the baby. They did a saline test and diagnosed her with swine flu. Her organs began to strain and shut down. She slipped into a coma. The baby was in danger, but doctors were able to successfully delivered her daughter, Abbey, prematurely while Kathryn was still in a drug induced coma. Kathryn died on Aug. 11, 2009 after a 44 day fight. She was 27 years-old.

Abbey stayed in the hospital under the eye of the clinic staff and her grieving father. Abbey held on for 7 months, but died in February of 2010. Doctors believe she “suffered oxygen deprivation in the womb,” according to the lawsuit.

The grief and shock take a while to pass when someone has lost their whole family. During that time it seems that Kenneth Flyte was able to reflect upon how the death of his wife and infant daughter transpired. He came to the conclusion that perhaps the H1N1 virus wasn’t totally at fault and that perhaps both his wife and daughter may have been saved if not due to some critical errors by Summit View Clinic Staff.

Wrongful Death Lawsuit

Wrongful Death LawyerKenneth Flyte, with help from his attorneys, filed a wrongful death lawsuit Tuesday against his wife’s primary health-care provider contending that doctors at failed to adequately treat Kathryn and Abbey.

The lawsuit suggests that Summit View doctors should have been more vigilant with the swine-flu pandemic under way.

He claims doctors did not “provide prompt and adequate medical attention” to Kathryn Flyte, especially when they failed to prescribe Tamiflu, a drug used to treat flu-like symptoms.

The lawsuit states that in a press briefing released in May 2009, officials with the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) advised doctors around the country to treat pregnant swine flu patients with antiviral drugs such as Tamiflu. The lawsuit further states that not only did doctors not prescribe the drug, but didn’t even suggest it as an option.

“The Summit View Clinic failed to comply with the CDC warnings, and the resulting damages to the Flyte family are tremendous,” the lawsuit states.

“Sometimes, physicians are reluctant to treat pregnant women with medicines, and sometimes pregnant women are reluctant to take medicines because, of course, they are sometimes risky during pregnancy,” according to an excerpt of the briefing printed in the lawsuit. “The experts who have looked into this situation really strongly say that the benefits of using antiviral drugs to treat influenza in pregnant women outweigh theoretical concerns about the drugs.”

Lawyers representing Flyte said he didn’t think Kathryn received a flu shot before getting sick with H1N1 and went on to say that his client hopes to educate the public about “the often treatable harms and complications posed by the H1N1 virus.”

Wrongful Death Lawyer Represents Victim’s Families

This is a very sad case that must have been horribly painful and drawn out for not only the father, but the whole extended family and close friends. These types of situations have a ripple effect that can leave a bitter taste in the mouths of a community and split people based on opinion.

Of course the clinic has no comment on the situation, which is standard procedure in most wrongful death lawsuits involving medical malpractice. Though there have been studies that show that monetary settlement amounts are lower and often avoided when the institution named in the lawsuit is open and forthcoming, it seems Summit View Clinic has chosen a more traditional route.

Phillips Webster has no monetary or legal interest or involvement in this case.

The law firm of Phillips Webster represents families of victims who have been wrongfully killed in Washington State. They are skilled attorneys in wrongful death lawsuits and personal injury lawsuits with years of experience that they will use to  assure the you get the compensation you deserve.

Call Phillips Webster today for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Federal Way Ordered to Pay $1.1 Million to Family in Wrongful Death Lawsuit

Washington Wrongful Death Attorney, Washington wrongful death lawyer, Wrongful Death, wrongful death attorney, wrongful death lawyer

December 23rd, 2010: Law Blogger

Wrongful Death LawyerPolice officers are human and just like all of us sometimes they make bad decisions. Unfortunately for Baerbel Roznowski, a court has decided that the officer’s decision ended up costing her, her life and the City of Federal Way $1.1 million dollars.

It all began when Roznowski, 66, after a 16 year relationship with Chan Ok “Paul” Kim, began to become overly possessive and verbally abusive toward her. The threats made her fear for her life so she obtained an anti-harassment order against Kim, who was still living with her, and police served Kim with the order on the morning of May 3, 2008.

The order barred Kim within 500 feet of the house. The officer left even though he saw Roznowski and Kim in the same house. Two hours later she was dead. Stabbed to death by an irrational Kim, 71, who is now serving 20 years in prison for her murder.

The lawyer for Roznowski’s daughters (the plaintiffs in the wrongful death lawsuit) says the officer shouldn’t have left them together. The lawsuit claimed that police failed to make Kim leave the home, nor did they use an interpreter, as required by the anti-harassment order.

The Defense

Wrongful Death AttorneyThe defense for the city of Federal Way was unable to convince a judge that there was a reasonable cause for the officer to leave.

“(Kim) was completely compliant and prepared himself to leave the residence, and there were no concerns at that time,” Federal Way police spokeswoman Cathy Schrock said at the time.

Yet just two hours the officer left the police were called back to the home.  When police arrived they say Kim was trying to cut himself with a knife. Roznowski’s body was found in another room stabbed multiple times.

That is why King County Superior Court jury found the city of Federal Way negligent and ordered them to pay the rather large sum, but not even close to the $8 to $12 million the lawsuit requested. Yes, $1.1 million is sizable, but one of that will bring back a mother to her daughters or make up for such a terrifying, painful, and completely avoidable demise.

Seattle Wrongful Death Lawyer Represents Families

It is important that police follow proper procedure before making judgments on a situation. That is what the procedures are there for. It is reasonable to say that police officers need to make snap decisions all the time, but it is important also that they keep close attention to details, particularly in non-danger situations.

As the plaintiff’s lawyer said in trial, “Protection orders are not pizza delivery, protection orders involve police work.”

Phillips Webster has no involvement in any part of this case.

Phillips Webster represents families of victims who have been wrongfully killed in Washington State. They are skilled attorneys in wrongful death lawsuits and personal injury lawsuits with years of experience that they will use to  assure the you get the compensation you deserve.

Call Phillips Webster today for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Problem Intersection Leads to Death of Teen and Serious Questions in Lacey, WA

Car accidents, personal injury, Seattle car accident attorney, Seattle Car Accident Lawyers, Wrongful Death, wrongful death attorney, wrongful death lawyer

December 14th, 2010: Law Blogger

Wrongful Death AttorneyA community is outraged today after a tragic and, some might way, totally avoidable fatality last night of a young man sleeping soundly in his bed. Not only does this lead to a serious debate about drinking and driving enforcement, as the DUI accident that killed two Federal Way teens did earlier this year, but also the things that the city ignored that led up to this accident.

Police say the SUV accident happened around 12:30 am this morning at the intersection of Ruddel Road SE, a road by any standards is wide enough to be a highway, and 45th Avenue SE, a residential road, in the small town of Lacey, just outside of Olympia.

A man was speeding on 45th Ave and did not stop at the intersection, crossing the wide four-lane Ruddel Road, lost control of the vehicle, busted through a tall wooden fence and crashed into the mobile home. The SUV punched through the bedroom wall of 16 year-old Austin C. Blankenship, killing him instantly.

Police say the driver and his passenger then jumped out of the SUV still lodged into the home and ran for it. Police dogs couldn’t find the suspect, but police say they know who the suspect is. The passenger was taken into custody in eastern Thurston County and was currently being questioned about his involvement and the suspect still at large.

Dangerous Intersection

Wrongful death lawyerLast night was quite a night of inclement weather for most of Western Washington, high winds and pounding rain caused floods and downed powerlines. In fact there were reports of a few deaths due to falling trees last night. Not the best night to go speeding around in a crappy old SUV.

A neighbor next to the scene of the accident said that power was out at the time of the crash and speculated that the driver may not have seen the street come to an end at the mobile home park. Neighbors say the streets in front of the mobile home at 45th Avenue Southeast and Ruddel Road have been plagued with problems.

This is not the first time this type of accident has happened. Another neighbor confirmed that the house next door to the home that was hit has been involved in at least three separate accidents. And according to witnesses it doesn’t stop there, there is at least one other house on that corner that has been hit.

“We’ve had numerous accidents on this corner,” Don Shoemaker told KING 5 News.

The manager of the mobile home park says he has complained to the city, but there has been no response.

“I don’t know what we can do at this point.” said Shoemaker. “Maybe this will wake somebody up,”

The big question is, did a young man have to die before city officials took action?

Wrongful Death Attorneys Represent Families

The good news in all of this is that authorities say they are familiar with the suspect and that they are hot on his trail. That still doesn’t change the fact that a young man is dead and, if it is true that they have received multiple reports of accident and complaints about this notorious intersection, then the city may be liable partly for this tragic situation.

Phillips Webster represents families of victims who have been wrongfully killed in Washington State. They are skilled attorneys in wrongful death lawsuits and personal injury lawsuits with years of experience that they will use to  assure the you get the compensation you deserve.

Call Phillips Webster today for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Seattle Wrongful Death Lawyer: Driver Killed After Hitting DOT Plow Parked on Hwy

Car accidents, personal injury, Seattle car accident attorney, Seattle Car Accident Lawyers, wrong way accidents, Wrongful Death, wrongful death attorney, wrongful death lawyer

December 9th, 2010: Law Blogger

wrongful death lawyerSometimes a tragic story is less clear than what is presented up front. Recently a Washington woman won a personal injury lawsuit because a utility truck had hit a horse and left it in the roadway where she hit the carcass. It seems Tuesday night the opposite happened, where the carcass was off to the shoulder, but the truck was sticking into the roadway, but this time with fatal results.

William H. Adsit, 57-year-old, of Spangle was headed south on U.S. Highway 195 south of Hatch Road in a 1994 Ford Ranger pickup truck when he collided with a snowplow truck that was stopped on the shoulder of the outside lane around 9 pm.

The truck burst into flame after impact killing Adsit at the scene, Washington State Patrol troopers said.

Apparently, the driver of the large Department of Transportation plow truck had gotten out of the vehicle to remove a deer carcass from the roadway, troopers said.

Our condolences go out to the friends and family of the deceased.

This is near a Washington State DOT deer carcass “hot spot.” That means that this Eastern Washington corridor south and north of Spokane requires a lot of carcass removal. There are procedures in place to take care of these duties. Perhaps those procedures also need to be reviewed.

Families who have experienced the wrongful death of a loved one due to the negligence of another should seek an experienced wrongful death attorney to represent their best interests and get the compensation they deserve. Call Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Wrongful Death Lawsuit Gets Retrial After Split WA State Supreme Court Decision

Washington Wrongful Death Attorney, Washington wrongful death lawyer, Wrongful Death, wrongful death attorney, wrongful death lawyer

December 7th, 2010: Law Blogger

Wrongful Death lawyerIt looks as if the wheels have not fallen off of a nearly decade and a half long legal rollercoaster ride regarding the wrongful death lawsuit filed after the disputed suicide of a young African American man in an Oak Harbor jail cell. It seems the family is getting another try at finding justice on behalf of their loved one.

The Washington State Supreme Court rendered a split opinion, which reversed a Court of Appeals opinion, and that likely means another trial in a lawsuit over the 1995 death of Edward Gregoire, a 23-year-old man who hanged himself in the Oak Harbor Jail after being arrested on a misdemeanor traffic warrant.

The lawsuit names Oak Harbor Police Chief Rick Wallace and several current and former members of the department, as well as the city, as defendants, whom displayed shock and dismay that the process is to be extended rather than done with as was the wish of the Court of Appeals.

But the Seattle attorney representing Gregoire’s wife and daughter in the wrongful death lawsuit, said the opinion was based on long-established law and state administrative code that requires jailers to take certain commonsense precautions to prevent suicides, which she said the defendants failed to do in this case.

A case that not only alleges negligence, but also eludes to racism and perhaps foul play.

The Incident

In December of 1995, a state trooper arrested Gregoire, a long time Oak Harbor resident and graduate of the local high school, on outstanding misdemeanor warrants. While riding in the patrol car to the station reports say that Gregoire alternated between violent outbursts and despondency.

Reports further say that when he and troopers arrived at the Oak Harbor jail, he suddenly broke free and made a break for it, but when they ran him down and held him he pleaded with them to shoot him. This would give the impression that he was clearly a danger to himself at that point.

Troopers, jailers and police officers alike all worked to get Gregoire into the jail. According to reports, at that point they didn’t administer any kind of mental health screening before leaving him alone in a cell. Gregoire was seen weeping in his cell, clearly suffering from mental anguish. That was only 10 minutes before an officer found him hanging from a bed sheet strung from the cell’s ventilation grate.

The officer soudned the alarm and several other law enforcement officers responded. According to the Supreme Court opinion, no one even attempted to administer CPR “even though it had been 5 or 10 minutes since Gregoire was last seen alive in the cell.”

Wallace, who was present at the jail at the time of the incident, said the officers felt that it was too late. But yet when paramedics arrived they detected warmth in his body and started CPR. After 15 to 20 minutes of vigorous CPR, the paramedics were able to detect a faint pulse, but Gregoire was later pronounced dead at the hospital.

The Island County Coroner Robert Bishop conducted a public inquest and, after a year of investigation, cleared the police of any wrongdoing, even though they made no attempt to save him.

A Long Road

Seattle wrongful death attorneyTwo years after the Coroner’s decision, Gregoire’s family filed a civil rights lawsuit in federal court. The complaint alleged that the department did not have a program for mental health screening for potential suicides. This caused them to fail to screen Gregoire or put him on suicide watch. The lawsuit also alleged police not only neglected, but denied Gregoire emergency medical care after he was found hanged.

The lawsuit went on to allege that Gregoire, in fact, may not have killed himself at all, but that the police negligently or intentionally caused his death and then proceeded to cover it up. It alleged racism played a part in Gregoire’s death.

A federal judge dismissed the case in 2001, but the wrongful death case in Superior Court continued

Proceed forward to 5 years ago, and a jury in Island County Superior Court found that Oak Harbor police officers were indeed negligent in the case, but that their actions were not the direct cause of Gregoire’s death. This exonerated the city from the $7.24 million in damages the lawyer had asked to jury to award.

But, as stated in the Supreme Court’s opinion yesterday, Island County Superior Court Judge Alan Hancock erred in reading jury instructions, This error may have inappropriately prompted the jurors to conclude that Gregoire was culpable for his own death. The justices found that jailers have a special relationship with inmates and a special duty to care for inmates that makes jury instructions regarding “assumption of risk” and “contributory negligence” improper.

With new legs this trial proceeds. It began when Gregoire’s daughter was a mere toddler. She has grown up being constantly reminded of her father’s death with every new trial and new decision. The lawyer in this case just hopes that it will finally be settled out of court and the family will be able to move on from the issue and begin their lives anew.

Seattle Wrongful Death Lawyer Helps Victim’s Families

This lawsuit shows that a death is not a matter of convenience. The issue is deep within the hearts of the family and it lingers through generations. Though the defendants may get fatigued and with the issue would go away, the fact remains that death is permanent and that, with persistence, justice will prevail.

Phillips Webster has no involvement in any part of this case.

Phillips Webster represents families of victims who have been wrongfully killed in Washington State. They are skilled attorneys in wrongful death lawsuits and personal injury lawsuits with years of experience that they will use to  assure the you get the compensation you deserve.

Call Phillips Webster today for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

NHTSA Requires Rear Cameras in All New Cars by 2014 to Avoid Back-Over Deaths

Car accidents, personal injury, Seattle car accident attorney, Seattle Car Accident Lawyers, Wrongful Death, wrongful death attorney, wrongful death lawyer

December 6th, 2010: Law Blogger

Seattle Car accident lawyerPerhaps you’ve driven a giant RV or large truck with a rear camera before. Though they take a little getting used to, they really seem to widen a person’s field of vision in the rear without the passenger having to stand out in the street directing the driver using shouting and primitive hand signals. But these cameras were originally placed so that the driver could park and not back into trees. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has a whole different idea for their use, child and elder safety.

The agency says that nearly 300 people are killed and 18,000 injured each year because they’ve been backed over, according to their data. Most of these happen in driveways and parking lots. Nearly half the deaths involve children under age 5, but back-over accidents also affect the elderly. That means that more than 50 people every day suffer serious personal injuries because drivers back over them.

To address this serious issue, the NHTSA has harkened back to a bill that was passed by congress relatively recently called The Cameron Gulbransen Kids Transportation Safety Act of 2007, passed by Congress and signed into law by President Bush. Two-year old Cameron Gulbransen was killed when his father accidentally struck him while backing his SUV in the family’s driveway.

New Standards

Congress in 2008 set in motion the safety upgrades in response to dozens of accidents in which children were backed over. At issue in particular were large blind zones in large sport utility vehicles and pickups.

The Cameron Gulbransen Kids Transportation Safety Act of 2007 requires the Department of Transportation (DOT) to research auto safety issues to which children are especially vulnerable. Under the Act the DOT is specifically directed on these safety issues:

  • Auto-reverse for power windows:Initiate rulemaking to consider issuing or amending Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards to require that power window mechanisms be equipped with an automatic reverse feature activated if the window’s path is obstructed
  • Blind zones:Initiate rulemaking to consider issuing or amending Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards to reduce a vehicle’s “blind zone,” by establishing requirements for different types of motor vehicles that could be met through the integration of additional mirrors, back-up cameras, sensors or other technologies
  • Brake transmission shift interlock:Require that all vehicles all vehicles manufactured after September 1, 2010 and equipped with an automatic transmission system using a ‘park’ position also be equipped with a system that prevents the vehicle from being shifted out of ‘park’ unless the brake pedal is depressed

In addition, the Act requires that NHTSA for the first time establish a database that stores information about injuries and fatalities that occur in non-traffic and non-crash related situations. Specifically, the Act directs NHTSA to gather information about:

  • The make and model and year of the vehicle involved
  • The number and type of injuries or fatalities
  • Potential causes of the injuries or fatalities

The new requirements from the Transportation Department are intended to improve rear visibility in cars by the 2014 model year. Most carmakers would comply by installing rear-mounted video cameras and in-vehicle displays. The government estimated that video systems would add about $200 to the cost of each new vehicle.

The agency estimated that the requirements annually could save 95 to 112 lives and prevent more than 7,000 injuries. In about 70% of the cases, a family member is responsible for the death, said Janette Fennell, president of Kids and Cars, a Kansas-based safety group.

“There is no more tragic accident than for a parent or caregiver to back out of a garage or driveway and kill or injure an undetected child playing behind the vehicle,” Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said. He said the changes would “help drivers see into those blind zones directly behind vehicles to make sure it is safe to back up.”

Does the Auto Industry Support This?

Seattle car Accident AttorneyAfter a public comment period, the NHTSA expects the proposal to be completed next year. Under the plan, 10% of the total fleet of vehicles sold in the United States will need to meet the standards by the 2012 model year, followed by 40% in 2013 and all new vehicles by 2014.

The rules will apply to all passenger cars, SUVs, pickup trucks, minivans and other vehicles weighing up to 10,000 pounds. Under the plan, test objects would need to be visible in an area 20 feet behind the vehicle and about 5 feet to either side of the vehicle’s center.

The government estimated the price tag on the new requirements would be around about $1.9 billion to $2.7 billion. Cha-ching!

So what do automakers think of this?

Industry spokespeople have said they were reviewing the proposal but were supportive of efforts to keep children safe. It is unknown the amount of money they spent to lobby against the bill, but since it passed, probably not much.

The reason for the lack of resistance is that the expense is easily passed to the consumer, regardless of the fact that all cars, SUVs, and trucks are going to have on board computers telling people things such as the weather and where to go. Most likely that is part of the delay. Technology needed to become standardized. But don’t worry, this is a good thing.

“Many people have told me that once they get a camera in their car, they’ll never drive a car without it,” said Bill Nelson of Dix Hills, N.Y., whose 16-month-old son, Alec, was killed in 2004 in a backover accident. “Years from now, everybody will be used to it, and it will be a great safety device for people to avoid collisions with anything.”

Seattle Car Accident Lawyer Protects Victims Rights

We applaud the move by the NHTSA and glad that the car industry isn’t putting up as much of a stink as they have in the past regarding other life-saving safety standards. We have covered too many tragic stories of both children and elderly people suffering personally injuries and wrongful death due to back-over accidents.

Phillips Webster represents families of victims who have been wrongfully killed in Washington State. They are skilled attorneys in wrongful death lawsuits and personal injury lawsuits with years of experience that they will use to  assure the you get the compensation you deserve.

Call Phillips Webster today for a free consultation.

Learn More About: