FOLLOW US: Twitter facebook
Washington & Nationwide (Toll Free 24/7)
(800) 708-6000
California
(213) 808-6740

Free Case Review

  • * First Name:
  • * Last Name:
  • * Email:
  • * Phone Number:
  • Comment:
  • Accept Terms *
    *Denotes Required Field

News Updates via Email

If you would like to receive our news updates right to your inbox, provide us with your email address. We won't use your email for anything besides sending you news updates from our blog.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Dangerous Drug Information

If you or a loved one has been injured by the side effects of a defective drug, our defective drug attorneys can help you and your family. We are currently investigating the following dangerous drugs:

Drug Side Effects and Injuries

Law Blog Categories

Car Accidents
3 Reasons to Hire Phillips Webster

Our attorneys have decades of experience negotiating with insurance companies regarding all types of vehicle accidents. If you have been injured in a wreck, contact us today.

  1. We represent EVERYONE in need anywhere in Washington - Minor and Major Injuries
  2. Experienced trial attorneys that will fight for your right to recover compensation
  3. FREE Case Review and we only get paid if you get paid
Learn more about our:
Seattle Car Accident Lawyers

Verdicts & Settlements

$20 MILLION - Commercial Injury
Confidential settlement for a commercial injury case

$19  Million - Grant of Coverage
Grant of coverage in insurance coverage case

$2 MILLION - INSURANCE BAD FAITH
Settlement in insurance bad faith case

$1.5 MILLION - CAR ACCIDENT WRONGFUL DEATH
Vancouver, Washington car accident that resulted in a death

$1 MILLION - DUI ACCIDENT VICTIM
Settlement for young man hit by a drunk driver

Our jury trial experience shows in the results we get both inside and outside of the courtroom.

More Verdicts and Settlements

Posts Tagged ‘Wrongful Death’

Why Does Washington State Top The On-The-Job Injury List?

on-the-job injury, personal injury, Worker's Compensation, Worker's Compensation Lawyers, Workers Comp, Workers Compensation Attorneys, Wrongful Death

February 2nd, 2012: Law Blogger

Washington State is one of the four states in the U.S. that has a state run workers compensation program, Washington State Labor and Industries (L&I). It has come under pressure in the last few years as private insurers and giant companies in the state pump money into efforts to privatize the system. Now, some disturbing statistics have come out that may help their effort.

According to an investigation conducted by KEPR TV in Tri-Cities, Washington State had the most work-related injuries last year out of any state in the country. Their investigation revealed that 52 people died in a work related incident last year, nearly twice the national average.

This statistic also includes thousands of workers who were personally injured in various accidents from everything ranging from falls to chemical burns. The investigators confirm that many of the accidents occurred in Eastern Washington at jobs involving manual labor.

But, why are these happening and what are state regulators doing about it?

Why Is This Happening?

This is where it gets a little complicated. The reason why there is so much pressure on the L&I over privatization is over the fact that rates for workers compensation has been steadily rising for employers since 2007 as state revenue has begun to dwindle and a mounting number of employers default on their premiums.

In fact, 2012 is the first year that the agency has confirmed that there will be no increases in what employers pay for workers compensation. This suggests that they have finally covered shortfalls in the funding, however, those who work closely with injured workers and workplace safety advocates suggest that this has perhaps come at the cost of employee safety.

Cuts in the number of inspectors has been deep and some suggest that this has caused workplace safety standards to falter. You see, the national standards set by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) are generally enforced by OSHA inspectors. Washington is an exception to this, as L&I sends out their own inspectors to sites such as the Tesoro plant explosion that claimed 7 workers.

These kinds of incidents are well publicized and garner a huge reaction, but thousands of injuries at construction sites and farms around the state remain barely investigated. In some cases, when the injury involves an immigrant, they will go unreported.

What Is Being Done?

Unfortunately, the problem with low resources means that much of what is done is reactionary instead of proactive, so many of the new rules implemented by L&I come after the fact. Some of the new rules this year involve:

  • Rules regulating the safety of cranes.
  • Rules surrounding handling of hazardous material.
  • Rules regarding training in hospitals and pharmacies specifically if working with chemotherapy drugs.

Aside from hiring new inspectors, L&I has decided to focus its resources on enforcing dead-beat employers and the care workers receive in order to get worker back to work faster. Thus, this pumps more money into the organization and costs them less in output rather than addressing the problem at the source. However, these policies have resulted in a promising project known as L&I’s Centers of Occupational Health and Education (COHE). COHEs are community-based organizations that work with medical providers to encourage the best ways to treat injured workers.

This whole program sprouted out of research published in the December 2011 issue of the American Public Health Association journal. Dr. Gary Franklin, medical director for the L&I), was one of the researchers involved in the study; Dr Thomas Wickizer, Ohio State University, College of Public Health, was the lead investigator.

L&I teamed up with physicians in Washington and throughout the country, health care researchers at the University of Washington, as well as business and labor leaders to find the “best practices” of helping workers in the first 12 weeks after a work-related injury.

These “best practices” focus on the safe, healthy return of injured workers to full function and full employment. Examples of best practices include:

  • Promptly filing the workers’ compensation claim.
  • Phoning the employer to talk about the worker’s ability to return to work or a light-duty job.
  • Regularly assessing a worker’s ability to do work activities.

The study found that when injured workers are treated using COHE best practices, they had 19.7% fewer disability days than other injured workers receiving treatment, and a reduction in total disability and medical costs of $510 per claim. Workers suffering from back strain had a reduction in disability days of 29.5%.

“We’re especially encouraged that the outcomes for workers with low-back strain were significantly better,” said Dr. Franklin. “Lower-back strain is a costly and common disabling condition in workers’ compensation.”

Currently, four COHE sites serve 2,000 providers and hundreds of employers, treating about one-third of injured workers in Washington. The findings of the study led to new legislation 2011 that will expand access to COHEs to all injured workers in the state by 2015.

Washington Workers Compensation Lawyers

It is clear that the efforts of L&I is successfully bringing in money and turning around some forecasting oversights. However, the new statistics are disheartening. Workplace safety is our priority, but that doesn’t specifically mean that privatization is the answer. L&I has proven to be a very effective and sustainable organization with a good safety enforcement track record in the past. It is only with renewed dedication by legislators that Washington State can have a fully functional public worker’s compensation system.

The law firm of Phillips Webster has a team of legal professionals dedicated to seeking just compensation for workers injured on the job. Our workers compensation attorneys will look at your case for free and give you options on what you need to do to move forward. Call Phillips Webster now for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

How Dangerous Is It For My Teenager To Drive With Passengers?

GDL Laws, personal injury, teen drivers, teenage drivers, Washington car accident attorneys, Washington car accident lawyer, Wrongful Death

January 25th, 2012: Law Blogger

Teen car accidents in Washington State are not only a giant concern for parents, but also legislators. Washington State is one of the more active members of the Governor’s Highway Safety Association (GHSA), which brought Graduated Driver Laws (GDL). These laws set guidelines as to how teenagers can drive at night, with passengers, and at what ages they can do these things.

Though the details vary by state, they stay under the same general principles of young driver safety and graduated system of licensure over a period of time.

  • Learner Stage: supervised driving, cumulating with a driving test
  • Intermediate Stage: limiting unsupervised driving in high risk situations
  • Full Privilege Stage: a standard driver’s license

These laws have come under attack as some studies have shown that they do not address maturity, which can vary from person to person and can be the difference in some of the most dangerous situations, namely, driving with passenger distractions.

Passenger Distractions

Teenagers can be an excitable lot, particularly when they’re in the car experiencing a freedom they had been previously deprived. As you’ll see, there are lots of reasons for these distractions and they can vary by gender, but what is not under dispute is that passenger distraction is considered by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) as one of the biggest causes of teen car accidents.

Since car accidents are the leading cause of death for people 16 to 25, this has made passenger distractions a huge concern for traffic safety officials and advocates. This week has also perhaps marked a turning point as two studies came out showing some of the causal factors involved in passenger distraction.

The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) and State Farm both published their studies in the Journal of Adolescent Health. They don’t specifically show the danger of distraction, that was already know, instead they help us understand the factors that may predispose teens to drive with multiple friends and how those passengers may contribute to crashes by distracting the driver and promoting risky driving behaviors, such as speeding, tailgating, or weaving.

“Knowing this, we can develop programs that work in tandem with current Graduated Driver Licensing laws,” said study author Allison Curry, PhD, director of epidemiology at the Center for Injury Research and Prevention.

The first study surveyed 198 teen drivers. For the most part teens in this study generally reported strong perceptions of the risks of driving, low frequencies of driving with multiple passengers, and strong beliefs that their parents monitored their behavior and set rules.

However, the teens who are most likely to drive with multiple passengers shared the following characteristics:

  • Considered themselves “thrill-seekers.”
  • Perceived their parents as not setting rules or monitoring their whereabouts.
  • Possessed a weak perception of the risks associated with driving in general.

Teen Passenger Distraction Risk By Gender

The State Farm study analyzed 677 teen drivers involved in serious crashes and compared the likelihood of driver distraction and risk-taking behaviors just prior to the crash when teens drive with peer passengers as opposed to when they drive alone.

Researchers found that both male and female teen drivers with peer passengers were more likely to be distracted just before a crash as compared to teens who crashed while driving alone. However, 71% of males as compared to 47% of females said they were distracted directly by the actions of their passengers.

The study found males with passengers were nearly 6x more likely to perform an illegal maneuver and 2x more likely to drive aggressively just before a crash, as compared to males driving alone. Females rarely drove aggressively prior to a crash, regardless of whether they had passengers in the car.

“Teen passengers can intentionally and unintentionally encourage unsafe driving,” said Dr. Mirman. “It’s best to keep the number of passengers to a minimum for the first year.”

The study authors also emphasized the important role parents play in supporting safe driving among teens and their passengers.

“Combined with Graduated Driver Licensing laws that limit passengers for the first year of driving, involved parents are an effective strategy to protect teens from a dangerous and preventable crash risk – driving with their friends,” said Chris Mullen, research director at State Farm

They recommend parents set a house rule of no non-sibling teen passengers for the first six months of driving and only one non-sibling passenger for the second six months.

When combined with a study conducted by the University of California, which (amongst a ton of other valuable information) revealed the causal behaviors cited in teen passenger distraction car accidents by gender as you can see in the chart below.

Washington Car Accident Lawyers

The attorneys at Phillips Webster support any effort that keeps teenage drivers and their families safe. We have seen how the terrible grief over the loss of a loved one torn away at the beginning of their lives due to a car accident can rip apart families and send shockwaves through a community.
Phillips Webster represents families of victims who have been injured or died in car accidents in Washington state. We are skilled attorneys in wrongful death lawsuits and personal injury lawsuits with years of experience that they will use to assure that you get the compensation you deserve. Call today for a free consultation.
Learn More About:

Can I Get Wrongful Death Compensation If I Lose a Child in a Car Accident?

Washington Wrongful Death Attorney, Washington wrongful death lawyer, Wrongful Death, wrongful death attorney, wrongful death eligibility

December 7th, 2011: Law Blogger

The single hardest thing any parent can go through is when they lose a son or daughter in a car accident. The suddenness of the loss and the questions can drive a person to a nervous breakdown. How did it happen? Who were they with? Why were they with them? Why were they where there? Why wasn’t I with them? Who is at fault for their death?

Sometimes the answers are just as painful as the death itself, however, once these questions have been established, then you may be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit by going over the details with your lawyer.

With an experienced attorney’s help, investigating the circumstances surrounding the death of your child can be much easier both emotionally and bureaucratically. The attorney will gather tangible data we cover in this article in order to determine the amount of compensation.

When filing a wrongful death lawsuit, you are seeking just compensation from the individual that, through their negligent actions, caused the death of your son or daughter. A wrongful death lawsuit is a civil trial where you are the “plaintiff” and those you seek compensation from are the “defendants.”

It is up to the plaintiff to determine fault or negligence by the defendant, which lead directly of indirectly to the death of your loved one. The task is difficult, but with the proper council, many families have received the justice they deserve.

From Whom Do I Seek Compensation?

There must be a source of compensation and the defendant must have money in order to pay whatever settlement or amount the court charges. There must also be a determination of negligence or breach of duty on the defendant’s part. Once that has been established, these individuals are supposed to be backed by insurance companies by law in order to compensate for damages, both to victims and their property, but also in the families in case of wrongful death. However, there are three main sources attorneys investigate:

Individuals – Generally, in the case of an automobile accident, there is a person driving, a police officer, a doctor, etc, that is specifically named in the lawsuit. These individuals are the alleged negligent parties that may have caused the death of your child. They are supposed to be covered by an insurance company by law. However, if they are not, they must take the compensation out of their own funds if they are indeed found negligent. This can be in the form of cash, leans on property, and garnishment of wages.

Government – Governments including municipalities, counties, or states have a responsibility to provide safety for their citizens. The police and response infrastructures have procedures and a code of conduct they must abide by also. Often if a child dies because of an infrastructure problem (pothole, sinkhole, blind corner, unmarked median, abandoned or dangerously parked city vehicles, etc) there has been a clear history of complaints and/or data linked to the problem prior to the death. If they have not taken reasonable measures to recognized hazardous roadways and intersections, then they should be held accountable for injuries and deaths that are caused by these hazards.

Insurance Companies – Believe it or not, but there are people who feel bad about suing an insurance company over the death of their loved one. But keep in mind that the company insures motorists by a risk-to-profitability scale. They have already taken into account the risk of the negligent driver by age, credit rating, driving history, and vehicle type. However, they will do anything to avoid paying out on claims, thus a campaign of through news and advertising over several decades just to make it so that families feel guilty for seeking compensation. They are also proactive on accidents involving death or serious injury and in fact, you may have gotten contacted by an insurance agent. Make sure you log that call and jot down whatever was said. Most of all, do not sign anything an insurance company asks you to sign without first having your legal representative review it.

Evidence of Wrongful Death

As stated above, there must be a determination of negligence, the actions of an individual or entity directly or indirectly caused the death of your son or daughter. The driver also has a duty to keep the passenger safe and follow the rules of the road. If they violate this duty called “breech of duty” then they may be liable for the death of the victim. To prove these things, evidence is required, and some of the evidence that is gathered is:

Arrests –Driving under the influence (DUI) is easily one of the largest and most senseless causes of vehicular death. If the other driver involved in the accident was arrested for DUI at the scene, regardless of who the police report cites as fault, you may be entitled to compensation.

Circumstances – If there was road construction, another traffic stop, another accident obstructing traffic, or any other alternate circumstances surrounding the accident, then there may be negligence on the side of outside sources. It is important to review all statements and details of the scene of the accident.

Citations – If other drivers were cited for infractions related to the accident then the accident may have been caused by another driver’s negligence. These minor infractions may establish negligence regardless of what it was for.

Medical Care – The trauma care in the Puget Sound area is some of the best in the country, but sometimes victims fall through the cracks. If your loved one died in the care of the emergency ward staff, you may want to review the circumstances with the help of legal council.

Police Report – As the spouse you may obtain the police report and speak to the officers that investigated the car accident scene in order to learn details that may have been omitted from the report. Omissions and sloppy reports often suspend justice.

Response – Many wrongful death cases have found that the accident victim’s death could have been prevented if the proper procedures had been followed by the police and medical response team. If you find these procedures or the care questionable then it is best to find a legal review of those procedures.

Signals – Many accidents could have been avoided if the intersection or road had proper signs, signals, and maintenance. The crash history of the section of road or intersection could also be important in a wrongful death lawsuit caused by a car accident.

Puget Sound Wrongful Death Attorney

When you have been stricken with the tragic circumstance of losing a loved one due to the negligence of another person in a car accident, then it is very important that you do not sign anything without a lawyer present. The lawyer is there to represent you and your interests in your time of need.

The law firm of Phillips Webster represents families of victims who have been wrongfully killed in Washington State. They are skilled attorneys in wrongful death lawsuits and personal injury lawsuits with years of experience that they will use to  assure the you get the compensation you deserve.

Call Phillips Webster today for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Why Does Washington State Have One of the Highest DUI Fatality Rates in the US?

DUI, DUI accident attorneys, DUI victims lawyers, personal injury, personal injury attorney, personal injury lawyers, Seattle DUI accident lawyers, Seattle DUI Victims Attorneys, Wrongful Death

December 1st, 2011: Law Blogger

It may be shocking to hear that Washington State has one of the highest driving under the influence (DUI) fatality rates in the country. The Northwest seems so sparsely populated, laid back, liberal, and almost innocent in a way. But then you see the statistics: highest suicide rate, largest population of heroin addicts per capita, one of the largest domestic producers of meth amphetamine. This underbelly is enough to make you cringe.

This sad fact about DUI was revealed by the organization Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) in their annual report. MADD is a grassroots movement that has grown to influencing national policies on DUI. And why not? Nobody wants to disappoint their mother. But disappoint we have and they suggest in the report that we be sent to our legislative rooms to draft tougher laws against drunk driving.

Washington State DUI Fatalities

MADD says that in 2009 there were 206 DUI-related traffic deaths in Washington state. This comprises nearly 42% of traffic fatalities in the state for that year. Only Connecticut, Hawaii and South Carolina had higher death rates from DUI.

That year was also a busy year for Washington law enforcement across the state as police stopped nearly 20,000 3-time DUI offenders and over 2,100 5-time offenders. MADD has recommendations specifically for Washington state to help with this disturbing conclusion.

According to the report “Washington has the most comprehensive ignition interlock law in the nation but could take additional steps to help save more lives. The state needs a better child endangerment law, legalization of sobriety checkpoints and utilization of no-refusal activities to further crack down on drunk driving.”

5 Criteria to Curb Drunk Driving

MADD has five criteria with which to determine the effectiveness of any given state’s DUI policy. States are assessed, determined, and then given stars for each policy that they comply with. There are only 5 five-star states: Arizona, Illinois, Kansas, Nebraska, and Utah. Washington, even with our horrid fatality rate, still rates three stars.

Drunk driving criteria:

Requiring Ignition Interlocks for all Drunk Driving Offenders – MADD cites more than 15 peer-reviewed studies to back their recommendation for laws that require devices such as ignition interlocks (breathalyzers set in the steering wheel that require little to no alcohol be detected before the convicted DUI offender can start their car). The Centers for Disease Control recommended this year that every state pass an all-offender ignition interlock law. By implementing this law alone, New Mexico and Arizona have reduced DUI fatalities by 36 and 46 percent.

Conducting Sobriety Checkpoints – Many people in Washington State find the prospect of checkpoints unsavory, leaving sort of a Gestapo taste in the mouth. Opponents also cite the fact that traffic is bad enough without daunting line of cars waiting for the police to stumble upon a suspect. However, according to MADD, sobriety checkpoints are proven to reduce DUI fatalities by an average of 20% by acting as a general deterrent to drinking and driving. Though opponents also say that it is a wasted use of manpower, MADD says checkpoints are cost-effective, reducing drunk driving expenses by at least six dollars for every dollar invested.

Enhancing Penalties for DUI Child Endangerment – DUI child endangerment is an issue that actually hits the headlines often without the required horrific car accident that thrusts other DUIs into the local headlines. This is where an adult chooses to drive drunk with a child or children in the vehicle and you would be amazed at how often it happens. MADD says enhanced penalties, such as making the crime a felony, are important ways to make adults think twice before acting so irresponsibly. This may run into an issue with the state’s roll in custody and parenting rights.

Participating in No-refusal Events – Refusing to submit to Breathalyzer or bloods test (BAC testing) is a serious thing in Washington State, but according to MADD, not serious enough. By refusing to submit to BAC, the organization says it could present a significant challenge to law enforcement and the courts. MADD insists that “no-refusal weekends” are successful in reducing the number of offenders who refuse BAC testing. The only way a State can get a no-refusal star, even if they have a no-refusal plicy in place is if drivers stopped have a 10% or lower refusal instance.

Utilizing Administrative License Revocation – Administrative License Revocation (ALR) is standard punishment for drunk driving in Washington State through the immediate confiscation of the offender’s driver’s license by the arresting officer. MADD says that studies show that ALR reduces DUI fatalities by as much as 9%.

Seattle DUI Victims Lawyers

Okay, so Washington State, with its 3 stars, is somewhat middle of the road in the country when it comes to DUI convictions, but the state has been pretty good about releasing funds for DUI patrols at crucial times such as holidays and summer months. But many advocates say that the patrols are not effective if the penalties for DUI are not stringent enough to curb the behavior.

It seems that the large fines, possible jail time, mandatory impound, and public record are not enough to scare people into making better decisions, particularly young people. Some have suggested that there needs to be more education and a change in social perception of the severity of the act of drinking and driving. Until then, the victims, their families, and advocates continue to fight.

If you or a loved one are injured or killed in a DUI wreck, it is important that you find legal council as soon as possible to help you through the legal components of the tragedy. Call the DUI Victim’s Attorneys at Phillips Webster for a consultation on your legal rights.

Learn More About:

Drinking and Driving Prevention Technology Takes A Giant Step

DADSS, DUI, DUI accident attorneys, DUI victims lawyers, personal injury, personal injury attorney, personal injury lawyers, Seattle DUI accident lawyers, Seattle DUI Victims Attorneys, Wrongful Death

November 2nd, 2011: Law Blogger

Currently in the State of Washington, drinking and driving laws are becoming some of the most stringent in the country. For us and other advocates for victims of drinking and driving, we welcome it. Not everyone is on our side.

There are those who use individual freedom as their justification for lowered drunk driving standards. This extends from the .08 blood-alcohol content (BAC) standard to the obligatory breathalyzer installed into the automobile by the courts for habitual offenders. However, those who have been personally injured or had loved ones who have been killed by a drunk driver will point out the individual rights of victims.

One of these organizations is Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD). This organization has been a vocal advocate of radical steps at drunk driving prevention including laws that not only cite the behavior of individuals, but also the bars that serve them. Now they have taken it one step further with the Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS) research program. A program that will undoubtedly stir a lively push back from the car manufacturers and those in the legal community who choose to defend drunk drivers.

Driver Alcohol Detection System for Safety (DADSS)

The DADDSS program began its research in 2008 as a national effort to develop publicly-acceptable technology that will prevent the illegal operation of a vehicle by a drunk driver.

The $10 million cooperative research project between the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Automotive Coalition for Traffic Safety (ACTS), representing the nation’s leading automakers, is now entering a new phase in which it will move out of the laboratory and onto the road. Researchers expect a drivable test vehicle to be ready within two years.

Researchers say that they are attempting to develop technology that won’t hassle sober drivers, requires no maintenance, and will be precise enough that it stops a driver when their BAC is at or exceeds 0.08.

“This will be lifesaving technology,” believes Rob Strassburger, Vice President of Safety and Harmonization of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.

How Does It Work?

Two companies, Autoliv Development AB of Sweden and Takata-TruTouch of Auburn Hills, Michigan, are offering different alternative. Each were awarded $2.25 million to successfully demonstrating a working technology during the proof-of-concept phase. They have the potential for ultimately meeting stringent performance criteria established for DADSS.

Distant Spectrometry- Autoliv is developing a breath-based device, which they say performs a fast,  contact free, unobtrusive measurement of the driver’s breath alcohol. It utilizes concentrations of carbon dioxide as a measure of dilution of the driver’s exhaled breath. Multiple sensors placed in the vehicle cabin will allow the system to ensure that the breath sample is from the driver only and not other passengers.

Tissue Spectrometry – Takata-TruTouch is working on a touch-based approach that can measure BAC by shining an infrared light on the user’s skin. A portion of the light scatters several millimeters through the driver’s skin before returning back to the skin’s surface where it is collected by the optical touch pad. This light contains information on the skin’s unique chemical properties, which can be analyzed to determine the driver’s alcohol concentration.

The Court of Public Opinion

The public has been inundated with anti-DUI messages and now at least are aware or the problem. However, nationally, drinking and driving continues to be one of the leading causes of death and injury on America’s roads, claiming a life every 48 minutes. The NHTSA feels that the DADSS devices are a promising new tool to prevent drunk drivers and repeat offenders from getting behind the wheel.

Opinion research indicates that the public is ready for such a device. Research shows that two-thirds of those surveyed considered the use of advanced technology to keep drunk drivers off the roads to be a “good” or “very good” idea. Authorities cite the fact hat there were still nearly 11,000 such fatalities in 2009, nearly one-third of the traffic toll. They estimate that DADSS could prevent an estimated 8,000 drunk driving deaths a year.

Seattle DUI Victims Lawyers

As we recognize that this is a radical approach, if their numbers are correct this could reduce drunk driving fatalities by an amazing 72%. With those kinds of results, the inconvenience is worth the overall effect on society as a whole.

This may prove to reduce the number of roadside shrines that occupy roads across the nation commemorating those lost to drinking and driving. The shrines are also a reminder that the measures as they stand currently are reducing the number of drunk driving deaths slowly, but now that technology has caught up to the need, it is time to not only change policy and force behavior changes.

If you or a loved one are injured or killed in a DUI wreck, it is important that you find legal council as soon as possible to help you through the legal components of the tragedy. Call the DUI Victim’s Attorneys at Phillips Webster for a consultation on your legal rights.

Learn More About:

Will Lower Speed Limits in Seattle Lower The Chances For Bicycle Accidents?

bicycle accident, bicycle bad habits, bicycle helmet, hit-and-run, personal injury, Seattle bicycle accident lawyers, washington bicycle accident attorneys, Wrongful Death

October 17th, 2011: Law Blogger

Seattle is largely considered one of the biggest communities in the United States for bicycle riders and commuters. This is readily apparent when you drive the streets as most of the main thoroughfares feature white bicycles with riders and arrows showing there direction painted on the pavement. Some places have the symbol painted right in the middle of each lane of a two lane road giving the impression that the whole road is merely one big bike lane and that cars are tentatively given permission to drive on them.

This is all thanks to Mayor Mike McGinn, aka the “Bicycling Mayor” who rides to work on a regular basis. He has introduced more bicycle lanes, green safety riding zones in intersections, and an emphasis on education. Now he is taking his policies one step further and pushing a road safety initiative aimed at making Seattle streets safer for everyone by lowering speed limits in some neighborhoods.

Changing Seattle’s Speedlimit

The Mayor in conjunction with Cascade Bicycle Club, is appealing to state lawmakers, asking them to make it easier for cities to drop their speed limits through House Bill 1217. The measure has been floating around Olympia  for most of 2011 and now interested parties are pushing harder on the heals of 10 cycling-related deaths already this year statewide.

HB 1217 specifically states, “Local authorities in their respective jurisdictions may establish a maximum speed limit of twenty miles per hour on a nonarterial highway, or part of a nonarterial highway, that is within a residence district or business district. A speed limit established under this subsection does not need to be determined on the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation. This subsection does not affect the requirement that local authorities conduct an engineering and traffic investigation to determine whether to increase speed limits.”

“We need to start think about each other’s frustrations, each other’s concerns, and how we can help make it easier to get home safely,” McGinn told KOMO News.

The mayor cites that this is not just for bicyclists, but also for pedestrian safety following Vancouver, British Columbia’s research showing the impact of speed on pedestrian safety in high pedestrian traffic areas. In 2012 Vancouver will be lowering their speed limit in certain areas.

However this is not a new concept. To deal with the problem of speeding in city limits, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) is also working on reducing the speed limit on a few major streets from 30 miles per hour to 25 miles per hour. Their internal Engineering and Traffic Survey results indicate that lowering the speed limit to 25 MPH is appropriate.

“These reviews and changes allow us to ensure that the speed limits are where they need to be to ensure the highest level of safety for automobile drivers, cyclists, pedestrians and Muni,” a SFMTA official said.

Bike advocates say speed reduction is just one option. They also want more speed bumps, signage and education. What they fail to mention is the potential in the number of car accidents.

Are Lower Speed Limits Safe for Drivers?

However, opponents suggest that it’s a cumbersome and expensive process from signage to informing the public as well as enforcement. Yet, municipalities who currently want to reduce speed limits have to fund costly engineering studies first. The proposed measure would eliminate this step and put lowering speed limits in cities statewide, including Seattle.

Data shows that the chances of death in a collision between a car and individual:

  • 40 mph = 80%
  • 30 mph = 50%
  • 20 mph = 5%

Opponents may cite evidence that in some areas around the country, higher speed limits have lowered the number of car accidents, suggesting that perhaps lower speed limits are to blame for some injuries and deaths due to car accidents. This is supported by the fact that the areas that have benefited from higher speed limits are relatively remote, or free of pedestrians.

In 2008, for example, Purdue University reported that higher speed limits in Indiana had no impact on the number of car accidents. But anecdotal evidence shows that highways and city streets react differently to higher speed limits, due partially to the existence of pedestrians and cyclists within city limits. So this evidence may apply to some places in Washington State, but not in more densely populated parts of the Puget Sound area.

Seattle Bicycle Accident Lawyers

This can definitely be a polarizing issue for many in the Seattle area, particularly amongst those who feel that the city has directed enough time and resources toward bicycle and pedestrian safety already. However, with all of the news of serious personal injuries and wrongful deaths to both pedestrians and bicyclists due to speeding, municipalities around the state may not have a choice but try something outside of the status quo.

If you or someone you know has been seriously injured in a bicycle accident anywhere in Washington State then it is important that they find an experienced personal injury lawyer. Call the Bicycle Accident Attorneys at Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Are Strict Teen Driving Rules Really Protecting Teen Drivers?

GDL Laws, personal injury, teen drivers, teenage drivers, Washington car accident attorneys, Washington car accident lawyer, Wrongful Death

September 20th, 2011: Law Blogger

If you are a regular reader of this blog then you may have seen some of the examinations we’ve made of policy regarding teen drivers and some of the dangerous driving habits they have. These habits are similar to those of adults, but unfortunately they have some tragic results.

You see, the biggest cause of death amongst drivers between the ages of 16 and 22 are car accidents. Not-only that, it sits at number two in injuries behind sports related injuries, but the difference is the severity of the injuries such as laceration, amputation, spinal cord injuries, and traumatic brain injuries. Sure, these can happen in sports, but are much more prevalent in car accidents. Oddly, they both can be connected to bad habits.

Some of the teen driver bad habits include:

  • Speeding
  • Distracted Driving
  • Drunk Driving
  • Drugged Driving
  • Fatigued Driving

We are huge advocates of education of youth drivers in order to inform them of the dangers and common behaviors. We also support some of the laws that are being passed in order to protect teen drivers from, well, themselves. Particularly Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) laws, but now there is research showing that perhaps those aren’t as effective as some advocates had previously thought.

What Are GDL Laws?

Governor Chris Gregoire has set Washington State at the forefront of GDL Laws. As leaders in the Governor’s Highway Safety Association (GHSA), appointees from Washington have had a major hand in establishing the general GDL standards. Since their decade long conception and implementation, some form of the GDL laws have been adopted by all states across the country except for North Dakota.

The rules are pretty simple:

  • Learner Stage: supervised driving, cumulating with a driving test.
  • Intermediate Stage: limiting unsupervised driving in high risk situations.
  • Full Privilege Stage: a standard driver’s license.

These rules seem cut and dry on the surface. Based on research, many of the accidents caused by teen drivers are due to a serious lack of experience. With this in mind, the GDL laws are intended to empower teen drivers with that experience before unleashing them upon the open road.

However, new research is suggesting that perhaps these rules are just postponing accidents to a later age and may actually hurt more than they help.

Teen Driving Research

A nationwide analysis of crash data published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) suggests that the restrictions on teen drivers may have worked on the intended younger group, there may be further flung consequences. While the number of fatal crashes among 16- and 17-year-old drivers has fallen, deadly accidents among 18-to-19-year-olds have risen by an almost equal amount.

“The unintended consequences of these laws have not been well-examined,” said Mike Males, a senior researcher at the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice in San Francisco. ”It’s a pretty compelling study.”

Some of the research data showed:

Fatal crashes increased among teen drivers

  • 16-year-olds = 28.2 per 100 000 person-years
  • 17-year-olds = 36.9 per 100 000 person-years
  • 18-year-olds = 46.2 per 100 000 person-years
  • 19-year-olds = 44.0 per 100 000 person-years

After adjusting for potential confounders, stronger GDL programs were associated with lower incidence of fatal crashes for 16-year-old drivers, compared with programs having none of the key GDL elements. However, stronger GDL programs were associated with higher fatal crash incidence for those up to 19-years-old.

Washington State has a strong GDL program , yet when comparing drivers in states with strong graduated licensing programs and those in states with weak programs, the rate of fatal crashes among 16-year-old drivers was 16% lower but was 10% higher among 18-year-old drivers. Overall, since the first program was enacted in 1996, graduated programs were linked to 1,348 fewer fatal crashes involving 16-year-old drivers and 1,086 more fatal crashes involving 18-year-old drivers.

What Happens to the GDL Laws Now?

Researchers in the study concluded that future studies should seek to determine what accounts for the increase among 18-year-old drivers and whether refinements in GDL programs can reduce this association. However they did not give any clear and decisive action concerning methods of adjusting the GDL program. Perhaps because the research is still not fully conclusive.

Experts said it’s not clear why fatal crash rates are higher among 18-year-olds in states with stronger graduated driver licensing programs. One possibility is that teens in these states may be waiting until they turn 18 to apply for a license because that allows them to bypass the restrictions.

So does this mean that all GDL laws need to apply to drivers of any age that have never had a drivers license since they have an equal amount of experience, namely, none?

This gets into a maturity and personal freedom debate that legislators and licensing officials alike would choose not to touch. It is further complicated by those who had drivers licenses in other countries or who have allowed their license to lapse for a matter of decades. However, the research is unavoidable.

Washington Car Accident Lawyers

The attorneys at Phillips Webster support any effort that keeps teenage drivers and their families safe. We have seen how the terrible grief over the loss of a loved one torn away at the beginning of their lives due to a car accident can rip apart families and send shockwaves through a community.

Phillips Webster represents families of victims who have been injured or died in car accidents in Washington state. We are skilled attorneys in wrongful death lawsuits and personal injury lawsuits with years of experience that they will use to assure that you get the compensation you deserve. Call today for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

Are The Washington State DUI Laws Effective Enough?

DUI, DUI accident attorneys, DUI victims lawyers, personal injury, personal injury attorney, personal injury lawyers, Seattle DUI accident lawyers, Seattle DUI Victims Attorneys, Wrongful Death

September 8th, 2011: Law Blogger

If you are a regular reader of this blog or have been a client of Phillips Webster before, then you know that we are one of the most ardent advocates of victims of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) in Washington State. There are roughly 250 people wrongfully killed every year by drunken drivers in Washington, nearly one person for every weekday, and a large portion of those victims are young people. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) it is one of the main causes of death amongst people 16 to 22 years of age. We find these statistics dismaying and take them very seriously, because some of these statistics are not mere statistics at all, but our clients and their grieving families.

The loss of a loved one in the prime of their life is horrible, but this statistic doesn’t mention the thousands of victims that are personally injured (some permanently) due to DUI accidents every year. Many in the legal system are frustrated by these life altering incidents, but see little change in driver’s behavior. Commonly convicted drunken drivers serve less time because 1/3 is waived for good behavior. This, compounded by credit for time they spent in King County Jail and typically a 10 day early release, renders punishments hamstrung and, in some victims’ advocates minds, not fully effective.

“You would think that with that degree of carnage we would take a pretty tough line on this,” King County Prosecutor Dan Satterberg told KOMO Radio. “But under the state sentencing guidelines, a person who kills another person while they are drunk driving faces a standard sentencing range of 31 to 41 months.”

Strengthening Washington State DUI Laws

Washington State legislature House Bill 1789, was signed into law in May of this year. It tightens up the rules for felony DUI drivers (drivers that are habitual drunk drivers with 4 or more convictions or have hurt or killed someone with a car while drunk before). This is a law that advocates such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) have been pushing for years and a major win for victims.

HB 1789 Tightens DUI Laws by:

  • Punishing habitual offenders - “Once you’re a felony DUI, you’re always a felony DUI,” said King County deputy prosecutor Amy Freedheim.
  • Takes into account prior offenses – The suspect’s overall driving record will be taken into consideration during hearings and sentencing.
  • Forces full sentences – This means no “good behavior” releases.
  • Requires ignition interlock device - A person convicted of felonious DUI is required to pay to install an ignition interlock device, under certain circumstances.

Satterberg was supporting a House bill, No. 1646, that would have made vehicular homicide by DUI equivalent to manslaughter – a charge less than murder given to people negligent for the death of another. HB1646 would also increase the sentencing range for driving under the influence (DUI) homicide to the equivalent of Manslaughter 1st degree. Instead of the standard sentence range for vehicular homicide in Washington State being 3.5 years maximum, the manslaughter first degree charge would increase the sentencing range to 78 to 102 months for the first offense (8.5 years maximum).

Unfortunately, the House Judiciary Committee did not take the necessary action to move the bill out of committee, so it remains lying dormant in the State Legislature. Satterberg said that the cost of incarceration is main issue that was a factor in why the bill died. He also pointed out that people are much more likely to die because of a drunken driver than be murdered.

By changing the DUI deaths to manslaughter charges, the designation would not be differentiated on the national level, and thus would suddenly make Washington State one of the most dangerous states in the country for murders committed. Not something legislators want prospective businesses and people thinking about moving to the state to see.

Washington State Drinking and Driving Laws

Washington State DUI laws, like most laws around the world, prohibit the operation of a motor vehicle by a driver not only under the influence of alcohol, but also under the influence of a controlled substance such as marijuana, cocaine, inhalants and other intoxicants. These include prescription drugs that specifically warn against operating machinery.

The .08 percent limit is a general standard used across the US to determine which drivers are “impaired.” Washington has lower BAC limits for commercial drivers (.04) and drivers under the age of 21 (.02). This ensures that underage drivers and commercial drivers stay alert and responsible.

The DUI limits translate as such:

DRINK EQUIVALENTS: 1 drink / 1 dose equals:

  • 1 1/2 ounces of rum, rye, scotch, brandy, gin, vodka etc.
  • 1 12-oz. bottle of normal-strength beer 3-4%
  • Approximately 7 – 8 oz. of Malt Liquor, or a strong micro brew.
  • 3 ounces of fortified wine
  • 4 – 5 ounces of table wine

Allow an hour per dose before returning to work. Example 2 glasses of wine, allow two hours from time of last dose.

Seattle DUI Victims Lawyers

Though Washington State is somewhat middle of the road in the country when it comes to DUI convictions, but the state has been pretty good about releasing funds for DUI patrols at crucial times such as holidays and summer months. But many advocates say that the patrols are not effective if the penalties for DUI are not stringent enough to curb the behavior.

It seems that the large fines, possible jail time, mandatory impound, and public record are not enough to scare people into making better decisions, particularly young people. Some have suggested that there needs to be more education and a change in social perception of the severity of the act of drinking and driving. Until then, the victims, their families, and advocates continue to fight.

If you or a loved one are injured or killed in a DUI wreck, it is important that you find legal council as soon as possible to help you through the legal components of the tragedy. Call the DUI Victim’s Attorneys at Phillips Webster for a consultation on your legal rights.

Learn More About:

What Are Some Bicycle Bad Habits That Can Lead to Personal Injuries?

bicycle accident, bicycle bad habits, bicycle helmet, hit-and-run, personal injury, Seattle bicycle accident lawyers, washington bicycle accident attorneys, Wrongful Death

August 25th, 2011: Law Blogger

Bad Bicycle HabitsWhether you ride a bicycle for pleasure on the weekends or as a commuter in the Puget Sound area, you know that Seattle is one of the most prevalent bicycling areas on the continent. Not only that, it is also one of the most progressive when it comes to implementing policies that attempt to keep cyclists safe. As expected, they can only go so far, the rest is up to drivers and bicyclists.

Up until this year, bicyclists have enjoyed a personal injury and death rate due to bicycle accidents that is surprisingly low to the national average compared to accident-per-rider ratio. This year there is speculation that this trend could change as a series of very tragic hit-and-run accidents have happened in succession this spring and summer.

Bicycle Bad Habits

We would be remiss to suggest that any of these instances are the fault of the victim in any way. Generally bicycle accidents are caused by drivers that are distracted, speeding, or otherwise not paying attention. This is not to say that some accidents aren’t partially caused by the actions of some bicyclist with very bad habits.

These bad habits can seem pretty harmless and in some cases even mirror the bad habits that drivers engage in that cause bicycle accidents. This is demonstrated by the Seattle Department of Transportation (SDOT) 2009 traffic report, which cites some of the potential factors that contributed to bicycle accidents that year. As you’ll see, the report suggests that some of the factor could be prevented by some changes in bad behavior.

Weaving Through Traffic – Some bicyclists consider this one of the benefits of a bicycle believe it or not. As cars park on the street in a row waiting for the traffic ahead of them to do something…anything, bicyclists speed on by unobstructed by their bulk. This is the time when bicyclists should be most cautious as drivers can get frustrated and make sudden moves such as taking a right without regard to bike lanes.

Puget Sound Bicycle Accident Attorney

Riding Against Traffic – This is actually illegal and can be extremely dangerous. It comes down to mathematics. When a car or truck is driving at one speed and a bicycle is traveling toward them at another speed, they encounter each other at a much higher speed that may not allow for proper reaction time in the event of a problem. This also increases the force in which they encounter each other, increasing the chance and severity of injuries or death.

Stop Lights – Part of the SDOT was observation. Researchers watching habits and counting bicyclists in a given intersection at a given time. You can do this yourself and if you do you will notice that there are some bicyclists that observe stop lights, some only use them as a signal to slow down then peddle as fast as they can through the intersection against the light. This is against the law. Almost all rules of the road need to be observed by both vehicles and bicyclists alike. The reason for this is that traffic requires a measure of disciplined predictability no matter who is on the road.

Look, No Hands – We’re not quite sure who is impressed with people who ride down the street without their hands on the handlebars, but we can tell you who’s not impressed; the EMTs who need to scrape the bicyclist off of the pavement and put them into the ambulance. This type of behavior only has one outcome, not being able to compensate in time to avoid sudden rocks, potholes, or drivers who aren’t paying attention. Please don’t do it.

Talking on the Phone – Is this a no-brainer? Apparently not, because bicyclists talk on the phone while riding more often than you think. Some don’t use headsets, others even text while riding! As crazy as this act seems it happens and no matter how tempting it is to answer the phone or talk wile riding, just like in a car, it lowers reaction time regardless of riding with one hand or using a headset. Please avoid doing this.

Fashion Sense – Okay, some bicycle gear can be a little bright and not flattering, but it is there to aid in cars seeing you. Wearing bright patterned clothing helps drivers see bicyclists against various backgrounds and in various conditions. Sure riding at night with dark clothing is a terrible idea, but bright glare is just as much of a detriment to bicyclists. That’s why bicycle clothing needs to have a dark and light ratio, unnatural color such as neon so that the rider contrasts against natural foliage, and some kind of reflective material. It may not look great, but it looks better than a body cast. And always wear a helmet, it’s the law.

Puget Sound bicycle accident lawyer

Music – It is so important that bicyclists pay attention and hear the vehicles around them that we advise bicyclists NEVER listen to music when they ride no matter what. This is one of the largest complaint against the Toyota Prius, that it was too quiet for bicycles and pedestrians to hear it coming.

Riding on Sidewalk – Bicycle accidents happen all of the time on sidewalks as they can be far less level than roads and can have a series of hazards such as:

  • Low branches
  • Playing kids
  • Debris
  • Pedestrians
  • Animals on long leashes
  • Sprinkler spray

If you hit any of these things it is the bicyclist’s fault. Why? Because they aren’t supposed to be riding on sidewalks, that’s why. But perhaps the most hazardous part about riding on sidewalks is entering intersections. Bicyclists enter intersections much faster than pedestrians thus giving cars that roll into crosswalks or turning into the cross street far less time to react.

Puget Sound Bicycle Accident Attorney

Forming bad habits when riding a bicycle is so easy as people start following the same routes and letting their guard down. Though the streets may be the same, the drivers are not, and neither is the weather. Please, when you ride, follow the rules of the road and always be on alert. It only takes a split second to get injured or killed in a bicycle accident.

If you or someone you know has been seriously injured in a bicycle accident anywhere in Washington State then it is important that they find an experienced personal injury lawyer. Call the Bicycle Accident Attorneys at Phillips Webster for a free consultation.

Learn More About:

What Are Some Ways of Preventing Personal Injuries and Fatalities in the Workplace?

personal injury, personal injury attorneys, Worker's Compensation, Worker's Compensation Lawyers, Workers Comp, Workers Compensation Attorneys, workmans comp, Wrongful Death

August 16th, 2011: Law Blogger

Dangerous WorkplaceSome jobs are more dangerous to worker’s personal well-being than others. Though the overall compensation for dangerous jobs such as fishing and construction is disproportional to less dangerous lucrative jobs such as banker or CEO, there are rules set to make sure that people of all occupations are safe in the workplace.

These rules are set by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Generally for the rest of the country, worker’s compensation is done through insurance companies paid in full or partially by the employer. Not the greatest deal for the employees since they rarely get any voice in the choice of plan. Luckily, in Washington State we have one of the few state run systems that protect all employees no matter what.

This is important looking at the fact that 76 workers were killed in the workplace in Washington in 2009 in addition to thousands of minor to serious personal injuries. These deaths and injuries were addressed, in most cases, by WA Labor and Industries (L&I) through their compensation program. However, these injuries and fatalities in particular are also accompanied by an investigation that tries to determine if the employer has been following OSHA protocols and if the death or injury may have been preventable. These following tips can help employers and employees determine potential problems before they begin.

In a white paper written on workplace fatalities and serious injuries, Fred A. Manuele, president of Hazards Limited, set out to discredit  the notion that reducing frequently occurring injuries will also prevent serious personal injuries or fatal incidents. He says that even if a company has a stellar safety history when it comes to serious incidents, it can be risky to take comfort in rates.

This theory is parroted by Jeff Shockey, corporate safety director for the giant aluminum manufacturer Alcoa, points out the risks associated with relying too heavily on a successful safety past. “It’s easy to sit back and feel good about total recordable rates, or OSHA compliance, or having passed the last ISO audit, and be lulled into a sense of overconfidence,” he says. “But fatalities are a different animal. They don’t care if you have the lowest total recordable rate.”

So what elements prevent deaths in the workplace?

Workplace Fatalities

Manuele says that non-routine work, upsets in regular work, non-production capacities and work involving sources of high energy make up the situations most likely to lead to fatal incidents. Other contributing factors also influence the risk of fatal and severe incidents:

Leadership - A lack of management ownership of the safety and the failure to hold safety as a core value can have a significant effect on the integrity of safety management systems. Many safety professionals know attest to the fact that breakdowns in these essential systems can lead to fatalities.

Turnover – One major part of have long term employees is the unfortunate opportunity for them to see the consequences to NOT following the safety protocols. Workers who stay with a company long term absorb the culture, including safety practices, but today’s more transient environment eliminates that benefit. Loyalty by the company breeds loyal employees and results in a safer work environment.

Employee/Employer Ratio - The ratio of employees to employers is increasing in many companies. With more employees per supervisor, management is less able to monitor the safe activities of employees. It also means limited time for them to mentor, teach and observe their employees, which could contribute to deadly workplace situations. Merely blaming “economic factors” for employee safety is unethical, when it should be part of the cost of doing business.

Economic pressure – In this trying economy, many companies are being forced to downsize. Research has shown that when this happens safety suffers. As companies are expected to churn out faster and cheaper production, it can create an atmosphere rife with the possibility of severe injuries or fatalities. Add in pressure from shareholders and other economic forces for increased growth without the expense of extra employees and it creates a potentially fatal work environment.

Workplace Fatalities

Employee Injuries and Workplace Fatalities

Of course, it isn’t the employer or the shareholders that are effected by these hazards, but the employees. Safety professionals have been targeting their efforts to the employees who need appropriate training or education. It is the employee that that is most likely to be able to identify these serious safety issues if they knew what they were.

New Employees - Developing a comprehensive new employee orientation process and focusing training on life-threatening risks could have a positive impact on fatality prevention.

Contractors – Research shows that contractors are at a higher risk to be involved in a serious or fatal incident. While many contractors may have excellent safety records, Shockey points out that “generally speaking, anytime contractors are on a plant site, it increases the risk.”

Temporary Employees – “Temps” are fairly common across many industries. By employing people who are not familiar with either the processes or the risks inherent in the job, they are put at risk.

Overtime – Some employees are paid for overtime, some are salary and do it to get ahead. Either way, they are potentially putting themselves and those around them at risk. Fatigue seriously increases likelihood of incidents.

Risk Takers –There are certain industries that have a history of tolerating risk-taking and at times even encourage it. Certain sections of fishing and logging industries are particularly guilty of this. This particularly affects younger, less experienced employees who are the last people who should be attempting anything risky.

Seattle Workers Compensation Attorneys

Employees that feel as if they are working in a potentially hazardous work atmosphere should seriously consider documenting these infractions. By identifying and recording the hazards concerned employees are better able to make essential changes in their workplace in order to keep themselves and fellow employees safe.

If your loved one has died in an accident on the job it is important to have a representative on your side to assure that your best interests are addressed. Some families may be left with young children and low single income and few options. Many times these deaths are caused by environments and policies within the workplace that the employer may have been able to anticipate or deliberately avoided for budgetary reasons. This would make worker’s demise potentially a wrongful death. That is why you need an experienced wrongful death lawyer. Call Phillips Webster for your free consultation on your legal options.

Lean More About: